First, we assume that these two propositions are true:
A, from ASP to ASP.NET is technological advancement!
B, the ASP programmer who is not fully engaged in the ASP.NET camp is a conservative!
Then we can make this inference: ASP programmers in the ASP.NET camp are the radicalist.
Next, we assume that this sentence is reasonable: all existed things have the reason for their existence. So what is the reason for the existence of the radicalist? How can the conservative will deal with a war in the market pattern of this technological progress? Here you will explain it first: I am a slightly conservative middle school, but it is delicious. The following text is for my subjective, if you feel disdain, you can smile, don't be more than me.
First, the radical party may say, I have a very strong interest in ASP.Net, I have been completely fascinated, OH, I love ASP.NET! If you have this radicalist, the conservatives often have no chance to fight against this game. There is a very important person to me, saying this: Power of Love, sharks are not afraid! It is this way of writing. However, I want to keep the fault to lose this game, after all, the driving forceps brought by interest and love are very respectful.
Second, the radical party may list several reasons for ASP.NET than ASP, and this proves that you turn to be wise. The conservative may hate this opponent, because in addition to easy to use, it is really difficult to find what ASP is better than ASP.NET. At this time, conservatives tend to adhere to the purpose of "doing things better" to deal with the provocation of the radicalist. We assume that the radical sent part is an ASP programmer. At this time, the conservative will ask: at the end of the ASP programmer (the most representative of your ASP level) - 1, do you stick to the appropriate coding agreement? Good format good code? 2. Do you have consciously increase the readability and efficiency of your code? 3. Is your defensive programming measures meticulously effective? 4, what level is you in the level of insights in the code reuse? 5. Do you have the first few models of database design? Is there consciously for non-standardized design? 6. Does your ASP application fully exerts the functional advantages of high-end databases? 7. Are you proficient in all aspects of ADO? 8. Are you skilled and reasonably separated from business logic, write strong COM / COM components and applied to ASP? ... n, is you an ASP master? A slightly modest, the radical party will be slightly "conservative" when answering the last question, and most of the conservatives believe that ASP has not mastered a thorough radical party in ASP.NET. It is difficult to build a tree. - Note that we have assumed the radical sentiments that have been ASP programmers. Indeed, ASP.NET is better than ASP, but this does not represent the level of ASP.NET programmers must be higher than ASP programmers. Many radicalists are blindly followed. Task, use ASP does not mean that it is, ASP.NET is the same. The blindstoricism often ignores this truth, and the conservative call just uses this weakness to counterattack.
Third, the radical party may propose, the future B / S is likely to be JSP and ASP.NET Shuangxiong, at least ASP can't help me keep the rice bowl. Unfortunately, this bureau is conservative. Life and love are respectful ... As far as I estimate that most of the conservatives should not be a professional programmer, they love ASP but do not rely on ASP to live. This is a very helpless situation, our professional programmer - whether the conservative or radicalist - must eventually obey the market arrangement. In macro, it is irrespective, progress leads the trend, and the trend determines the destiny. But in the microscopic but heart-sour, customer day, only money! no way. Assuming that the technology used by project development is appropriately selected by the development team (instead of customer saying), then the market space of ASP will definitely be bigger than now! Beginning it, this is here. Writing here, some things must clarify: First, "conservative" and "radicalist" in the article are defined in the propositions and inference of the document, not that all ASP.NET programmers are "radical", please Do not expand our definition. Secondly, "conservative" and "radical pie" that appeared in the text are not full, but only partially referred to. Please enter the title, don't sit the wrong position, don't sit without seat. After all, whether it is a conservative or a radicalist, there is an individual difference between them, and cannot be generalized. Finally, it seems that there is no achievement of Noise into Voice, I have just seen this article twice, I found that it is still noise, just a little bit. failure!
Summarize it, I hope everyone can finally listen to a little voice from noise, I will satisfy: I is always respectful, they are the best reasons and motivation you do. Second, even if it seems that it is no longer mainstream, there is still its value. If there is love, please consider not give up. Third, whether it is learning or uses some kind of technology, please do more thinking, seeking improvement, not satisfied with the current level.
Finally, I wish all kind people good luck!
