Intellectuals and Life Cui Wei Ping
Intellecto is those who are willing to be their own things. Since he has a mind, he will not force himself, but because of his work in his hand, it is very attractive. Some problems have not been solved. Some details are not perfect, and some links need to put They find out, so he is god, want to stop, want to stop, feel that if you leave or interrupt it is a unfortunate thing. To this end, he is willing to dedicate yourself in his life. Some kind of charm is too big to give him a kingdom.
For him, the most authentic is your life. Subina is grinding his eye, Kant can't make a dozen kilometers in his manor. The first thing Wittan's back from the war is to send the huge amount of property left by the father (it is said to be a poor, That would only be ruined them), then went to the primary school teacher. Aquiimide and Hegel have to wait until the enemy comes to their yard. Why are they so uncomfortable, so simple? What is attracting them, let them sit in a mess? Then I can't say it. Who can explain the happiness of wisdom, the happiness of thinking is more fun than the music of the mouth, eat can't eat it happier? Who can explain a sense of thought, rich in knowledge, and well-trained people have purchased in his study than any purchase, have a lot of stocks? Who can explain the boundaries of expanding their minds than expanding the power of the power? Let him fascinating, a small step, a small step, a small step, how many thoughts, the day when the night can not fall, is a thousand failed, the first thousand and one from the dark and loneliness The rebound, that is fascinated, disappointed, and even desperate are surprised, surprise after happiness. To this end, he is only willing to choose daily life, only the daily life of calm order can make his work guarantee.
But I know that there are some "intellectuals", they only hope that the social major events, the people are sad, they are around the scene, comment on the scene, comment on the foot, the fingers, and the gums, and once the wind is over, It's like venting the ball, the heart is lost, and the ideological feelings are very stuck. For them, daily life is hell, when the people are unreasonable.
This is willing to know more than the common people's intellectuals and general people? This problem is too difficult, too easy to get up, I said around a bend, the relationship between intellectuals and ordinary people is like an ordinary people and another people's relationship, you and your neighbors. You will pay the water charges, the rent, gas, health expenses, the rest, the lives of each person, there is no fantasy between each other. On the place where I live, there is a mahna every day. I will never go to him, and someone has free hobby. He is not reading if he is not reading, and people still say that you will not play mahjong every day. On these specific issues, I don't think people will be embarrassed, but people tend to ignore these specific experiences and give up their relationship or the world. Someone will lament, it will lament now "people are in ancient", "moral level drops", "cultural desert", wait, it seems that the life of the average person is full, all lost direction, sorry the ultimate Target, "Ultimate Care". I don't know what this means. So many years of education, this mass view is not. How do people live in general people living, what is willing to live in life?
According to the following, it is worth "ultimate care" to let everyone live. You live, I also live. I will let you live, you also make me live. "My life" is also very important. I don't say the benefits of life bringing to themselves. I just want to point out the negative impact of myself does not live to others: If a person does not live, he doesn't know if he has a life requirement, do not know how To respect the lives of others. The people who have born people always call some things as the bourgeois or small bourgeois "sentiment", and then I will not be able to use it. This can't be said to be sincere. Because they have not experienced their benefits, they don't know their role in making people's beautiful mental state. This is like a person who has its own personality knows how to respect the personality of others, a person who has his own free thought how to respect the free thinking of others, think they are precious and crucial. What didn't have in his own experience often he is not used to others. In this sense, today's intellectual thinking should be more liberated, and the footsteps must be faster, try to develop their lives, enjoy all the wonderful things, one of the results do not develop habits of people living with others, don't like to Others are in place or others want to look at themselves. Only to respect the lives of others can guarantee that their lives are uninterrupted and not self-disturbing.
Intellectuals should be passionate, try to enjoy, I am afraid it to violate ancient training "The worries of the world, the music of the world". I really want to express the different opinions of my traditional Chinese ancient intellectuals. I have been uneasy because of this different opinion, but I want to think, I am afraid because I am a woman, women are ordinary people, so observing the perspective of observation and those who have more big ambitions are different. First I don't like the special gesture of the kind of home in this sentence. I stood in the row for a while, and I stood in the end of the row, just I went to the team, so I raised myself, and this has already implicit a privilege. Is this privilege not to connect with the bigger privilege group? Second, I don't like the word "the world" in this sentence. "The World" is an imagination of the world, abstract, unconfirmed, especially suggesting that "the world" is the "Tianzi" position, "the world" is "the emperor", no "Son" is not called "the world." Once I gave an foreigner, a newspaper, a newspaper, said the word "Jiangshan", I even said that she took her life and did not understand. She said "Jiangshan" is a beautiful scenery, how can the beautiful scenery go to "play", go to "sit"? I took my head, yes, there is an attitude towards the feudal emperor to treat the world. Jiangshan is who is to belong to, which is the Jiangshan, "Jiangshan is so beautiful, there are countless heroes"! As women, don't look like this. Taojiang Mountain is to let the sons fate, and they are born with blood with blood. Those who want to be home is died, women's work is just like a swallow, a poor, a poor, a poor. Third, I don't like this expression in this sentence. Before the country did not have a joy, was a person who is always the face? Do not feel persuasive. If you get the truth, this truth must be good, good things are pleasant and not distressed. How can you get frowning because you get the truth? Because you have a good thing yourself, it is painful? If so, then you will throw this thing, so you can hurt your life. Besides, if you are so sad, who dares to approach you, dare you like the truth in your hand? Since this thing can't make you happiness, then you can't make others happiness, so why prove it? I am afraid that some people are in life, not I don't respect them, but they are too severe, so I don't dare to go forward. I am also afraid to read some articles, although the author's learning is better than me, but always makes me feel that it is done in a very unpleasant body and mind, and the human head of writing is very hurt, I can't see it. I said that is it to go back to the child's position from the woman's position? One thing is exact, I always think of it as an educator, just less enjoyable education, I don't like it. In my eyes, if a knowledge is particularly far from a good voice, it is especially called, it is not because of nothing, but he makes a significant contribution to human civilization as an individual. His contribution is also intellectual, mainly to change people's ideological way. When Hitler's iron didon conquered another country, Popper wrote "Open Society and Its Enemies" in New Zealand, and he regards this as his work. What he thinks is not to defeat another nationalism in a nationalist, but the nature of the tumoroma of human life. He pointed out: "The power of worship is the worst idol worship of human beings, is the remains of prison and slave age."
