Have you encountered? Anyway, I have a project may be two items that do not have a cost, the purpose is to let the company have idle people, I understand it.
I think it is a good thing. I should organize them to learn some new things, do some internal information, engage in technical exchange lectures. Sudden people in the existing project group suddenly have a large number of people, the project person in charge is a bit busy Broken, the task is to be redistributed, and the exchange should be re-made. The original project progress is disrupted, because some people think that the project progress should be accelerated. Although I have seen the "Moon Myth", what is it? Maybe someone Understanding the progress of the project is not a simple number of people, but the main problems mentioned in the article and the secondary issue, how many people can understand? It is a person who creates the result is a positive subjective initiative. Get a sense of accomplishment from the work. Plus people, our contracts will neither siren too late, and money will not come to the evening. As the head of the project, the natural responsibility is to complete the task as soon as possible. Don't waste humanity, but the customer's mating schedule is not unilaterally able to change. Increase the human hand, increase the risk, increase the possibility of the project leader to make mistakes. Maybe leaders' mainly don't want him to make mistakes. I can't say, once Said, all kinds of interpersonal balance will arrive, no endless conference .... Actually, I also said, you know that there will be no effect. Because our theme is no cost. I want to wait until they When you leave this project group, the project team will encounter real unparalleled costs. Is the company's reputation required cost concept?
