Sender: Kevene (Sleeping Time to Sleeping)
When I just started experimentation, how did someone else say, how to do it every day, thinking that it is a scientific research. Two months passed, suddenly found it in place in place. That feeling, can only be described in "frustrating". I started to quo my behavior and ideas. I feel that there is a habit of the habit of resting me. It is accustomed to the cloud, and it is used to exercising, I am used to busy. I'm not a graduate study, just a cheap and diligent technician. Later, I saw the graduate students around them in the same mistake, and I was amazed at the universality of these issues. So I decided to summarize the experience in scientific research and discuss it with you. I hope to take this approach to the real scientific research; I hope that these experiences have become the accumulation of graduate groups after experiencing thousands of hammers, so that the later people can learn from, less detours, and direct problems. Thanks to the Ding Zhiyuan, I can think about it deeply here. It is preface. (one two three four five six seven eight nine ten)
I have some experience in scientific research (1) I have some experience in scientific research 1. Half time to do experiments, half time to read the literature. Never consume all time to be on the bench. Look at the literature, read the book, see other people's operations, listen to others 'experience, study others' thinking, think while thinking. To learn to compare, don't blindly. Otherwise, it will be plagued by some small problems. 2. The more fully preparation, the worse the experiment. The ancients, the sharpener is not mishering. The pre-knowledge reserve, literature reserves, materials are prepared, method preparation can avoid hand-held, full pre-undecretion makes you confidence. One step is a footprint, you don't have to "come back from the beginning." The least endure is to lazy lazy at the beginning, causing some obstacles that cannot be excluded. 3. Record is true and detailed. People always have a little vanity. It is a lot of people 's way to remember the successful steps or beautiful results. As everyone knows, many valuable experiences and unexpected discovery are like this to you. Objective, real, detailed record is a valuable wealth. 4. Don't save money for the boss. Efficiency is the first. I have saved money all day long. Once I have used unreliable things, I will only waste time, suffer from hits, and I can't save my heart. 5. Grasp the psychological advantages. People who have done experiments have experienced failure and setbacks. Some failures should occur during the pre-undeconsive stage, you can accept it in this time. If you don't do pre-experiments, you encounter in formal experiments, your frustration is obvious. If you accidentally operate because of the time, you will be depressed. If you can put a decisive place due to the dryness of your heart, you can avoid the occurrence of tragedy. If you don't know what to do today before you enter the laboratory, you'd better want to go again. The biggest mistake is the same error. Remember, repeated education does not change people are not suitable for experiments.
I have been aware of scientific research (II) 1. First look at the review, and then look at the review of the concept of clearing the concept, and see the masterpiece. First, see the article published by the tutor, and then look at the teacher's thesis of the teacher's reply. The direction (actually should be seen before the graduate student), see the latter know those who can learn from 3. Early moving hands to learn key technologies before leaving the brothers. 4. If the work of the teacher, I must see it. The results of the experiment records are not necessarily credible! 5. Two-hand preparation design topics should be written in order to clarify problems, ie, regardless of positive or negative, can write articles. What is the positive result? If the topic requires positive results, you may have to design a few parts in advance, in case the first part does not have expected results, you can use other parts to make up for losses. I have some experience in scientific research (3) 1. Most articles to see the abstract, a few articles to see the full text of the full text, often make full text as music, so that there is no time to see the content of the article, more unrelenting Look at the abstract. There are not many full textures that are really useful. It is a waste of excessive pursuit. Of course, only the abstract is also right. 2. Concentrates the time to read the literature will always forget. The more scattered the time of the literature, the more waste time. Concentration time is easier to connect to form an overall impression. 3. Do a good job in documenting and tag copying or printing, directly using a pen mark or annotation. PDF or HTML format literature, you can use the editor to light or change the text color. This is another important means to avoid time waste. Otherwise, it is equal to it. 4. Preparing the referenced article to read itself. Incidents caused by transupported. 5. Pay attention to the reference value of the article. The influencing factors of the publication, the number of the population can reflect the reference value of the article. But pay attention to reference to other articles of this article to evaluate this article: Support or opposition, supplement or correcting.
I have done the experience of scientific research (IV) 1. Experimental classics will not experiment experiments, the teacher complete the previous steps, solved all the problems, let everyone see the last step of the perfect . Is this a true experiment? At that time, we also asked Teacher Tianzhen: Can we go? When do you pay an experiment report? For most people, experimental skills can only be "bubble" in the laboratory. 2. Communication is the best teacher to do experiments to encounter difficulties. What is your first reaction? Do you try again? give up? Reading book? These practices are reasonable, but the first thing you should think is to communicate. For those who have identity, private ascendants reflect your respect for him; people who are in the same year, open discussions can make everyone think freely, and be cautious. Never close the door. A experiment toss for half a year, and later others tell you that it is dead, don't you be big? 3. The highest level of ability is that the ability to express your ability is ultimately recognized by others. Expression ability, reflecting the ability to write and say, is the quality of long-term cultivation. For example, I found a rare case, write a one-on-one; I can only send one case report. For example, make a topic, write a good one or a number of art; writing can only send a summary or being smashed. A picture, a table, is not an embodiment of expression. Hundreds of thousands of characters, can win a big fund; although the relationship is important, it is not good to write too bad. Some people say that I don't learn PCR, don't learn SPSS, just learn PPT (PowerPoint). There is a little in this way, and the laboratory's BOSS is on a string of PPT walking on the rivers and lakes. There is often a graduate student to be clearly attacked by the minds of mind. There are also graduate students don't understand why I did most of my work and the boss made another person who didn't work, let him go to the General Assembly? "You didn't see the ability to have Zhang mouth? 4. Learn English, don't learn. Nowhere to go to Japan or Europe, academic exchanges have long been English world. You don't have to unfortunately I don't know an article, I'm writing the article, people who are writing the article are guilty of learning English. If English is not proficient, don't go to learn. 5. SCI is a trap. luck! Some people have no effort to hang a SCI article. You don't envy him. Because of my knowledge, it is some people designed, the experiment is that someone else has made his hand, and the article is a mentor to help him find abroad, and he is not good at doing scientific research. But he is because an SCI article has been thinking in the world of scientific research. So I have to go abroad, to do experiments, continue to send SCI, to earn US dollars. Since then, I have embarked on a road that is not belonging to him. (Maybe there is a ingredients of acid and grapes). But look at the people around, look at yourself, is it really suitable for research? Is it really not suitable for research?
I don't know what extent, scientific research and fake is not a pair of scientific research and fraud. But people on the stage are talking - never fake. 1. Appropriate fraud: Not related to itch, the deviation is not large. The normal adult DNA control of age and gender matching is actually used to use the cord blood DNA; 200 cases have been used in the paper, and there are 150 cases in the paper; there is a significant difference in the paper, and there is also a significant difference. However, the difference in mean has no papers; random packets in the paper, actually packet; the paper is aseptically operated in animals, actually only partial instruments are soaked in disinfectants. 2. Passive fake: tolerant, suffering. The brother's paper is published, the mentor let Yi Yi continue, I didn't repeat it, but I can't say that the brother's paper has problems, Irai has made more "deep" research on the basis of concealing facts; What do you can make; many people's experiments have become unusually smooth before graduation, and it has come out. 3. Objective fake: unintentionally, lack of common sense. The paper reported a new missing mutation, which is said to only picked a clonal sequencing; a few times of the experiment that the repeated number did not repeat it. 4. Active fraud: I have been very eager to have a lot of money. A electrophoretic photo in the paper is too late to redo, borrowing a similar photo of someone else; the enzyme is cut, there is a belt should be completely cut, but it is not clean, Irai PHOTOSHOP put it down; The PCR workload is large, but only one record in the PCR meter uses; P = 0.041, the actual P = 0.055, and a positive observation in the control group was 0.041. 5. Actively fraud: chasing fame and fortune, a few crazy Irai published 50 papers in the first signature in the year; there is experimental record after the paper.
I have some experience in scientific research (six) English article Writing 1. Read 10 documents, summarizing 100 common sentence patterns and common phrases. Frequent review. Note that the literature author must be in English, the literature is related to your profession. This is a by-product that usually reads the literature. 2. Find 3-5 technical routes and statistical methods with your topic. Write a draft of the paper. To follow the title, author, summary, background, purpose, materials, methods, results, discussions, acknowledgment, reference, ideas, pictures, tables, photos, and instructions. The benefits of doing this are from it to easily change to any magazine format. http://www.jiansuo.net/cgi-bin/ut/topic_show.cgi?id=10853&h=1&bpg=1&age=0 3. For each part of the paper, especially some specific way, to discuss some specific Aspect, all find 5-8 articles reading, enriched and perfect. Only the English expression is discussed here, and it is recommended to people lacking English writing experience. 4. Find the draft of the magazine you want to vote, then find 2-3 Article of the magazine, rewrite it according to its format. Note that each rewrite must be saved as different file names to avoid problems cannot be recovered. 5. Look for English master. If you can't find the right person, go http://www.oleng.com.au, which provides English Correction and Improvement, Not Translation, which is highly recommended to people with money. My colleague submitted to the magazine to the publication for only 2 months, and the middle flower $ 200 was changed in this company, very fast. I have some experience in scientific research (7) Document management 1. Download electronic version of the literature (Caj, PDF, HTML), paste the article title as a file name. Note that the file name cannot be special symbols, to delete the / /: *? <> | And the wrap. 2. Different topics are deposited in different folders. The topic of the folder is short, such as: PD, LTP, PKC, NO. 3. The literature that you have seen is returned to the subfolder, and at least separately separately separately. 4. Important literature is based on the importance of the file name to add 001,002,003 numbers before the name, then arrange the icon according to the name, the most important literature is in the foremost. 5. Copy or print the literature, punch with a hole, load a hard folder (¥ 10-20 / one).
Some experiences in my scientific research (8) We often play some small cleverness in the reference to the references, and it is not known that these will reduce the quality of the paper. 1. Know that it is not clearly a similar work of peers, but it is deliberately not quoting similar work in the peers, so that you will look "new" "leading". In fact, it is a peer. 2. Due to the breakthrough, deliberately intercepting the author attempting to negate the part to bake your own point of view. 3. Citting and not seriously see the original text, the citation is wrong. 4. Sources are not untrustworthy sources of unreliable (such as informal or non-academic publications) and do not indicate sources. Common in some statistics. 5. Blind self-quotting is not to illustrate the relationship between his work and the pre-work, but is simply quotted to improve its own article.
Several facts of my scientific research (9) For several reasons why the domestic articles are not high: 1. The reviewers of the reviewers have been quite limited to the Internet, and the ability of the Internet is quite limited. If the research is impossible to verify that the study is meaningful Where the innovation point is there, the method is reliable, and whether the result is credible. But incredings is what they often mention is "referring to the literature is not new enough." 2. Although the wrong reviewer generally specifies two reviewers, the editorial department often makes the articles of human tribological biology, which does not understand molecular biology, and makes a more complex articles that do not understand statistics. For love, few people raise "I am not suitable for review this article." 3. Relationship articles have a relationship, what is simple. 4. Do not recognize the negative result of the negative result is considered meaningless. No wonder some people call "I want to do a negative magazine." 5. No fake is unwilling to become a victim of the system. If the result is not expected, it will not be able to cross. For survival, it is a press graduate. I have a study of scientific research (ten) dynamic research 1. Relations of scientific research. Xiang Munqin found that X-rays, with a simple observation, the Nobel Prize, is less and less. More research results come from the long-term accumulation of the laboratory. Finally. Don't expect a scientific research. Design topics should not be very high. The fund review is also the case. There is no pre-accumulation, and the possibility of funding is small. If the selection instructor wants to think: Do you want to start a family, or ask for people? 2. Document to track. When the title is found, it may be very different from the situation of the literature. Pay attention to tracking during the experiment. Good luck, you can get more clues; the luck is not good, I found someone else. According to this, correct your experiment. Be sure to re-examine the literature before writing the paper. 3. Record to review. The previous experiment records are reviewed frequently. With the increase of experience and improvement, you will find that the initial judgment is not necessarily correct. 4. Material should deteriorate. Over time, some reagents will degrade, some equipment will aging, which causing you to get the previous results after the previous method. PCR is a devil! Many people have such a feeling. This is just a simple example. If a reagent is only an effective amount, you need to increase the amount. If a harmful substance is produced, it is probably the reagent. If the device reads drift, you have to correct. In short, there is a problem to find the reason, and every step is "exact"! Otherwise, it is a boat as a sword. 5. The boss is going to see. The boss also touched the stone over the river. His idea is at any time. I feel that things are not good, he will turn. You have to polish your eyes and see the seedlings, otherwise it will be dizzy. Can be properly guided. Interact.
