Today tried to have a legendary C Builderx
More disappointment
Combined with one of the selling points Multiple library programming
Nothing to make programmers feel very convenient
In fact, I will use the library that can be downloaded online.
Which library does developer want to compile yourself?
ACE is in my machine, but it is necessary to compile for an hour (a Release version, a debug version)
Boost's regex regular expression library also compiles for a long time
In this case, there is no difference between using VC.NET.
Moreover, VC.NET also has the smart prompt function in the world.
And CBX does not have, there is no smart prompt to the development tool feelings only better than the cold weapon.
Personal version of CBX can't use Together
However, VC.NET can use Visio to reverse engineering.
Although it looks more hard
But always there is okay.
Another selling point of CBX
Multi-compiler support
Let C Builder ociate a bunch of compilers
I believe in most people
That is like a chicken rib
Why do you say that? ?
In order to make the code debugging as soon as possible
Generally use compilation speed compilers
After completing the code debugging
You will choose a compiler with high quality compiler to compile and publish
So, in fact, two compilers are enough.
Fast compilation, BCC and CL can be competent, compiling quality, no one can go out of Intel
Some people say that the GCC's compiler is good, I have used it, in fact, the compilation speed is not fast
GCC's compilation quality is evaluated by authoritative institutions, only 70 percent of Intel ICL
The reason why GCC is good, to a large extent, it is said to support standards.
But now Stan Lippman has arrived in Microsoft, Intel can also support standards.
So ... I will not say it (of course, it is said to be the Intel platform, if you change the platform, maybe a gcc cow)
GCC is a compiler that supports the most hardware platform. This is no one can look back.
Tell the standard, in fact, the compilers of each family are almost
Anyway, I have almost no cases that don't support standards.
Because it is not supported by the standard, it is too difficult to support standards.
This is the same for each home.
The average person is basically not an annoyed standard with the problem of solving the problem.
So, in the IDE of VS.NET, an Intel's compiler is very comfortable.
Use a bunch of almost unused compilers without eyebrows
The only advantage of CBX is to cross-platform cross-platform cross-platform
Target operational environment for code compiled in a platform is actually another platform
The compiled code is always not true.
In summary, CBX is later than Vc.NET launched
But almost failed to give VC.NET
