Solle-pro-column> People Management (中) Keep Everybody Busy ------------------ Gina: Bruce, I see that Wantati, I have been playing ICQ, getting off work When I arrive, I will run with the flight? This is not ok. Bruce thought, Wen Ti is not writing a handbook? The system has not been written at all. What are she busy? Moreover, she has already supported the header. : I will discuss this problem with Wenti. Gina: We don't allow someone to be iDLE. The company's finance is so tight, and every minute must be properly used. If there is a person IDLE, the company is equal to a productivity. This way, how do we explain the shareholders? I also feel that this theory is correct. Leading family salary, I have to do it in work. So let everyone have the greatest productivity. The problem is that the more experience is, the more don't think so. I usually seem to have no productive forces, I think about some problems that can improve productivity. Something spends too much time to do it, will spend too little time to think. In addition, for those who have no productive forces, you have no way to find things to do. Because what he is doing well. In order to let these people are not in the IDLE state, you have to find an experienced person to bring him. As a result, follow the sixty kilograms of sand bags to run. The sandbag will run, but it is a sandbag that is a sandbag, it will not be moved again. That is also calculated. The problem is that the person in this hull package will run unfair. I will die for a long time. So sometimes, let the people who have no ability are free, in fact, for overall productivity is helpful. Moreover, if the focus of Manager is putting these people who have no productive forces play a productive forces, he will not have time to make these productive people can work better and more enjoyable. Is this a good thing for the team? I do not think so. Another bad thing in Keep Everybody Busy is that the company will try to take a work that exceeds his capacity. Maximize the use of each part. Software development is especially the case because the work will have the stage of handover. The analysis has finished doing the design, and the design will write the test case after the design is done. After the system analyst has written the analysis document, it will be idle. Usually we will help him find things. So there is usually a lot of items at the same time. In order to prevent any resource idle, if there is a project's schedule change, someone will have no trouble. So it will usually take a project that exceeds the existing personnel can bear, so you can determine any time, everyone has things. So, we will have a demand that exceeds our capacity to meet. Resource will become a serious shortcomings as the progress of the work will become serious. When Resource is insufficient, you will make more expensive to do cheap work. Therefore, the high-level supervisor becomes going to wait for the copy machine to go to the photocopying, because there is no industrial reading. In the era of industrial age, the cost of a piece of paper is equal to the cost amortization of the rent copy, plus the salary of the work student. Now the cost of a paper is equivalent to the cost amortization of the rent copy, plus expensive engineers, and even the salary of the high-end supervisor. This is not enough. The problem is that this thing is always one more and then three times in the case of indifferent resources. And we only see a salary of an industrial reading. Because those who can't cut off, salary will have been hanging in the cost of profit and loss table. As for what they will do, this is not the focus of profit and loss. The last harm of Keeping Everybody Busy is Multi-Tasking: "A person has a different job in the same time." Multi-tasking ------------- Development software is actually one Activities and then digestive activities.
One must take time to understand and think about the problems faced, in accordance with your experience, to organize your thoughts, and finally describe the results of this transformation in a wide range of models, or programming language, can be smooth Find a solution. This is almost the same, you need to cultivate emotions, after the aura, plus body health and sensory stimulation, you can do what you want to do smoothly. However, for some key work, we often need an important superman participation project development. The problem is that Superman is usually busy to save the world, so most can only help me in a short time, or point to the lost lamb. At this time, the problem is coming, for the customer, if you find that the superman is only occasionally saving the earth, there will be constant complaints. If a woman should be called, he is halfway, and suddenly said: "Sorry, I want to turn it, the end of the table is another old contact. "I have interrupted this happy process in hard and students, run to receive another guest. Will you think this guest is happy? Will you be happy to pay you? Experienced people tell us that you have to complete a whole turn, you can take it. Otherwise waiting for you to come back, both sides have to re-cultivate emotions, and there is a way to continue to do things, and it is not necessary to refresh. However, in many software companies, this play code is constantly staged. They first hit beautiful people's signboards, requiring a better price, wait until they want to do things, and then send a year to the old age to accompany you. Every time the customer is asking for beauty? Software companies find beautiful women sitting on a platform. This is also, more embarrassing, they also ask the customer to pay the beauty to add the big sister to the Taiji. For the customer, this software company is like taking the money, but it is as evil, but the lady running is as evil, wait until the next chance is coming, you need to have a long play, you can pose The lust that has been cooled is not very unpleasant? Even for the company's internal development team, honestly, it is also harmful. It's just in my heart, and the appearance is not too much. For these project members who want to listen to the teachings, they just started to feel some comprehension, the Buddha ran to other family. Next time, it is already a thousand years. What happened this? So, we can't ignore the transition cost of project members. The average person wants to convert the mind to the idea that can quickly learn the superman. It is necessary to prepare a preparation, but also in addition to the superman, other people's time can be wasted. So these Vanfei can take more time to adjust their minds, do a good job - not, is the preparation of learning. Usually study the scriptures, the Buddha is temporarily, it may be more prone to me. However, for a superman, don't he do not need any adjustments and preparation? Perhaps occasionally a few conversions, it is not required to prepare too much pre-work time. However, if you let him go through multiple projects, you still want to maintain high productivity, this will follow the need for a man to have a continuous ten times, and there is no low tide in the middle. Not to mention that these projects may spread in different locations. When they pick too much, he may need to rush to another place from a location. The light is accumulated, it will be considerable. Resource waste. Another serious impact is that the overall waiting time. When the superman is free, the other people have to wait. In fact, it is not only the work responsible for the Superman. Some work as long as a delay, Project iron will be DELAY, like this work is not allowed. So as long as these works have a little flash, the development time of the project will be dragged for a long time.
Then the development cost of the entire project will be as flying as the rocket. The problem is that if a person has a lot of work, it is easy to drag the progress of other projects because of their separation. For example, a must have three projects of A, B, and C. Every job must do 10 days. He did the project A5 days later, B. PM of this project ran to find him, asked him to make B. So he did the B project for 5 days. Then, the PM of the C project is also coming to him, he wants him to help the C project to solve the problem. So he did the C project 5 days. Then, the PM of the project A ran to chase him. He took 5 days to finish the A project. The same drama was staged. He spent 5 days to finish the B project, then spend 5 days to finish the C project . Let's take a look at where the project manager is estimated about Schedule. Every project's PM thinks, if a certain can be done to be done in a sense, as long as it is finished for 10 days. The problem is that a spent 20 days is done, and B spent 20 days, and C also spent 20 days. In accordance with the constant executives, which PM will catch such a high buffer? Project A PM may think, I caught a 10% buffer, so this thing should be taken for 11 days. The PM of the project B may be 12 days, and the PM of the project C may catch 15 days. Ok, the result is that every project will delay. This is still under the consideration of the cost of each operation. A certain A $ is not lazy, but every project will be delay. So now I have heard "" You have to spend 15% of the time in the project A, 30% time in the project B, 55% of the time in the project C ... ", I want to yawn. The number will not lie, but the theory hidden behind the number is really right? Do you do this, can you really work? When I was young in the school, I didn't hear Multi-Tasking for the project. How much harm is there. Until the workplace, it was begun to teach 50% in the project A, 25% in the project B ... This idea of this allocation resource is very intuitive for most supervisors. After all, we have a national class in the first class, and the second class is greater. I think at the moment of Taiwan's project resource allocation meeting, I will still hear similar claims. However, it is not necessarily right. Multi-Tasking is not to be ignored for the side effects of the project. I am quite curious in the course of the software engineering or project management, it will ignore such an important issue. However, in addition to Multi-Tasking, we also thought many ways to waste employee valuable time. That is: "Waste the employee's time in the meaningless thing."
Washing employees in unexpected things ----------------------------------- Accountation: Bruce, the Ornier of your department, has not fills the Time Card in two weeks, which is not. Bruce: Sorry, I will urge him to fill. Bruce: Oliel, you have not fill in Time Card in two weeks. Hurry and write. Oynilg just wrote halfway, suddenly being interrupted by the phone: 喔. it is good. Five minutes later, Oynier changed a copy of the Time Card Copy on the last week, and was given to Bruce. Bruce: O'Neill, you are not having a holiday? Is there any of your last week? And your Charge's Project Code is filled. Olger: sorry, sorry. You refund me. Olie spent 30 minutes, carefully check his Email mailbox, recalling the two weeks, fills the Time Card, fake single, business trip application, travel reimbursement order, and close the relevant receipt I gave Bruce. After O'Neill was interrupted, it took an hour later. After a day, these things ran to the accounting department. Accounting: Bruce, you sign the wrong position in the travel expense reimbursement order. You will take back to Oynil rewrite a piece. Bruce: Sorry, I will handle it ... The more the government, the more bureaucratic habits. I suspect that the basic hypothesis of modern accounting is "Every employee is likely to be a thief, so it is necessary to carefully check the inside. "When the organization is large, the bureaucrats, the more fear that there is nothing to do, and will strive to design a variety of forms, five-flowers, so as not to have a thing of the status. Even if it is a small thing, it will be every department, and each supervisor must be signed. Of course, this is often done in politics. Each supervisor is deeply afraid that the competitors who are in the same level will come into contact with what he doesn't know, and it will be the secret of promoting the promotion of the economy, so it must be in the process of decision-making. So you use a high-salary program to design a master, and a professional manager, you will take their precious time, may be a price for thousands of money, for the company will send them three or five, Fill in the document there or the signature cover seal. The company is usually proud of the rigor of their internal control system. Another time killer is the meaningless meeting. The company is a big, the divisions of the division, the more people will come to the jurisdiction, and people will have a lot of time. Especially the supervisor. Some supervisors have encountered the business that is not what he is responsible, always likes to provide conscience suggestions, and the great place is that these recommendations can usually be deemed logic and violate the common sense. According to my experience, as long as people, some people will play this magical role. In addition, large companies often find people who have no decision. People who seem to have decided have no shoulders, they will succumb to the pressure on the last layer. Bruce: About the style of the website, I would like to ask if your company has a specific idea? Sina (IT Department Director Manager): In order to strive for time, I think you first make three layouts to us, we will find time to ask the high-level supervisor in the competent meeting of the next month. After two weeks, the first review meeting will be held before the meeting. Siene: I don't like this, I don't like it, I want to ask your web designer to design a few lively layout.
Bruce: But this is based on your existing website style? Sina: Our current website is so messy. Are you more than this? Before you have to do this, ask me first. Please ask your web designers to change a relatively vivid color. Bruce: Ok, the next week is the review meeting. I will ask the web designer to overtime to change the new layout. Si En: Hard work, we will open a meeting after three days. I will find the user's supervisor Linda, and my boss Jiexi Capay. Three days later, the second review meeting before the meeting. Linda: What is this? How did you use this pretty color? Bruce: This is in accordance with Sene's suggestion, we hope to use a relatively lively color. Sina: I just suggest that you should play according to your profession. Linda: This doesn't have Align at all of our other website style now. Jiexika, what do you think? Jiexika wants, I should find a way to cover Sina, otherwise the scene is not good. By the way, the company seems to have another department has similar provisions: I remember that the company's cross-departmental website standard setup team should have defined a website style standard that our company should follow. Sina, do you have a reference to Vendor? Sina: I don't know if there is this standard file. Jiexi Card: Before making decisions, you can ask me first. You can go to the Joe IS discussion of the Group's Standard Site Standards. I will send you her email. Sean: Bruce, then please design the new style of the website in accordance with that standard. Bruce: ....... There is of course the best. (Fuck, there is such a thing that will not take it out later?) Review the day of the meeting. Big avantnace: How is this font? Bruce: This is designed in accordance with the criteria set by the cross-department website standard. Big Ethnic: We have been older, there are old flowers, this word is so small. Big Herb: Yes, how do you rolled this picture? We have to pull it with the mouse to use the mouse, it is not used to it. Try to put the content in a picture. Jiexi card: Yes, yes. How does this narrative fold? You should pull the field a little. Big Bad A: You are here, I will see. Ok, your mouse does not move. Ok, is this mouse not to move, is it a picture of what tips? Tell people what this feature is doing. Bruce, but the standard we get is prohibited from doing this. Big arml: This happen, Jiexika, you look back to help me Call Meeting, I will come to a member of which group is discussed. Jiexi Card: No problem. Big Betica: Bruce, this function prompts you to do it first, after we open, tell you what this result is. Big Herb: Isn't it very popular now? Do you want to add an animation? Big avatar: Yes, we can ... The venue has fallen into the discussion of animation effects, and everyone will express their favorite animations. After half an hour. Finally ended this meeting. So Bruce has a large number of words, and the field is widened, but it is not rolled, and the resolution of the latest animation effect is also added. Web Designer Daniel: How is this possible? How can we turn the word bigger, the field is widen, but don't roll up the picture? Bruce: I also say this, but they said, this is your major, you must be able to do so.
Daniel: Yes, I will also make the sea water in the Red Sea. ... After a month, the big head of the big head, took the lead in the big brother to see this system. Take the lead in the big brother: How is this picture so long? Bruce: This is because the last time I decided to do Flash animations, let our picture make a lot of lively. Take the leader: take off. Is this a platform for information exchange between suppliers? What to do so? Moreover, our supplier's frequency is limited. Big Betch: Big Brother, you're a good. Head B: Bruce, we just want you to add some more good results, but you have not told you to make such a big file. Bruce, you are an expert in this industry, you should know that you can't use too much archives to take up the frequency width of the network. Bruce: But the size of the flash file will be bigger, there will be such a result to do animation. Big avantle: We are not an expert, you should highlight this Issue. Bruce: ...... Using the unilateral meeting, then use the consensus to overthrow the consensus, to prove that our delight, thinking about it, seems to be the best entertainment of many high-level supervisor office life. A decision-making process like this may be uncommon in real life. I have seen such a report in the gossip magazine, the company's planner, in order to help the newcomer take a loud art name, after many internal sites discuss, finally provide three recommendations to the boss. As a result, the boss went to find some of his favorite fortune, and took three names, from the boss's little wife, from the suggestion of Mr. fortune, pick a favorite, such a newcomer name. Then, the artist's red big purple, but also thanked Mr. Mr.'s gods. However, this is not the worst situation. The worst situation is to participate in the transnational conference. Some large companies are particularly superstitious about the consultant flying over. So when you meet, you will ask CONSULTANT to visit. After all, the foreigners have foreign guns, except that people are high, the boat can also be a little bigger. So when meeting, there will be people to talk by Chinese, then in order to let the foreign countries understand the content of the conference, some people will use the blunt English explanation, and some people think that the translation of this translation is not good. Just use a hard-working English to explain the wrong place in the front, and finally consultant probably understands the status, he will propose his best proposal. But because Consultant usually rejected by the layer, it is not very understanding of the dragon to go, so his suggestion is usually a person who is taking this trip, starting with a nonsense from a child. Then, there will be some people who have a state of nonsense, regardless of God. In order to avoid everyone's English is too bad, use Chinese to translate the English in the English. Then there will be someone to continue to refer to the translation of Chinese. Ok, this situation is very sour, and it is necessary to continue to talk about it. This will take a long time, you can hold back that you don't want to sleep, you can take into account the United Nations to work. Every time I encounter this situation, I usually is the protagonist responsible for the conversation. Every time I have finished this meeting, I will feel that life is about half. Another common time killer is too much file.
SA To write Analysis Document, SD To write Design Document, Programmer To write annotations, Tester To write Test Case, TestResult with Test Report, Project Manager To write a wide variety of Plan, Report, and Meeting Minute; each person To write Status Report, the Time Card ... software industry can be said to be an industry that specializes in production documents. Producing no one has the ability to see file, as well as a boring standard, require a wide variety of files, and write a file that does not have strength to synchronize update, it has become the industry. In most companies, the real necessary documents may not be written, but unnecessary documents may be sweaty. And the files already written, most of them cannot keep the version update. So the content is usually a day in describing the history. Different documents may be just different days. So the files and files are likely to be stringing between each other. Of course, there are many programming designers who are disgasted. The necessary documents will definitely help for the development of the project. The time spent on the production of unnecessary files will eat the time to write the necessary documents. So in most cases, the necessary information is always accidentally missing, but unnecessary files will be overwhelmed, but will be drown in our hard drive. Some people have said: "The wrong decision is more terrible than corruption. "Improper use of resources is indeed the biggest problem in many software companies. However, most of the time, even if you think this kind of measures are not good, you may still feel that you have no ability to change this. To eradicate Multi-Tasking, how much consensus is to be established? What is the behavioral mode to reduce how much behavior is reduced? To remove useless digital management, how many decay brains are well? To respect the employee time, how mator is needed? These are not easy to do. Therefore, the supervisors can usually do to take flexible appeal, such as * advocating team spirit * excitation * to advocate team spirit ----------- Create a steel tower, is not an easy thing. However, for many supervisors, they can play a lot of cards. The company's people are so much. I found a few bird people, so, I can only put a few people together and form a miscellaneous army. Usually find someone else's condition: * * In a certain resource scheduling meeting * * Bruce: This Project I still need 5 Programmer, Coding 3 months, test 4 months. It also requires three Tester. Gina: It seems that we are now tight. Bruce, do you have any suggestions? Bruce: PROGRAMER, O'Neill is free with Toto Yakovich, I have already asked. I still need 3 people, I want to find Bryan, Werattons help from Nordiji. Jackson: It is impossible, Bryan is less than three months in my Project. Nielsen: Norweiji also has to leave from the current Project in two months. This is still optimistic. Edman: Webai is not good, he has already raised a retained payment, he intends to go to the skilled surgery. His knee has not been good since the last injury. Bruce: What should I do? Do we want to do this project? Gina: Yes, I heard that I have just come in to have an indentative student called Efferson.
Bruce: But we last for the work of the work from Boston from Boston, it will not be used at all, will there be the same situation? Moreover, only Efferson, only one person is only one. Gina: That first let Efferson top this position. Nielsen, you have to overtime in Noveeiji to take the case, don't look at it. There is a problem, I am responsible for dealing with the customer there. I have been launching such a long way, there is no reason to continue Support for so long. Jackson, Brian can only stay for one and a half months. Jackson: No, recently, this case is going to Pilot Run, Bryan is not there, will go out. Gina: Yes, Bruce, Bryan does not fall. This way, otherwise you first put Efferson in your Project Organization, we will find three indigenous students. I contact Wark. Bruce: I don't want Wark, he can't be a developer at all, and it is more than half of it. However, I heard that his classmates Pierce is not bad. Gina: Then you put Walke, Pierce, put it in the Project Organization, which plus Orel and Sterekvich, you have five people. If Novezech can add, there are six people. Bruce: But Walker, Pierce, and Efferson are indiscriminate. These three people are more than one and a half, and I can only count half, so it is alone.
Gina: Yes, I look for Malong. When he wanted to leave, I would persuade him, ask him to help this case. Bruce: If Malone can come, it is so good. Then I only have a problem with Tester ... Many times, if the discussion has become a programmer, who can only be half, this team method, probably no group of fantasy teams. Due to the limited number of soldiers, everyone's talent is different. So it is easy to have a labor and uneven situation. If the competent is unclear for everyone's ability to understand, the unsatisfactory people will put in the wrong position. Then you can do it is: * * Kickoff meetings on a project * * Bruce: Our project, there are many people to work together, including Walker, Pierce, with Efferson, they are all countries High school students of the university. I think we must ask everyone to cooperate with each other, play a team spirit ... * * A month after the project progress review meeting * *: Bruce: Malone, see these young guys, you have to feel more. March: The Walker is mixed all day, where is it all day, I don't know what to do. There is also Efferson, doing things, can't take the rules. I accidentally caught the files I wrote, I have a backup of my LOCAL. Bruce: Malone, since we are teams, you are so deep, just have trouble you help. We now play on the same boat now, you will play a team spirit, help them, I see Pyels is not bad. Mron thought that it was more money to play a team spirit. Whoever still managers: Yes, this kid is not bad. However, it is a pity that it can come limited. Bruce: Yes ... I have been a month. Efferson: What is the picture of Brown? The whole design is not right, and our features will have these problems. Do he understand UML? Malone: This is not the relationship between UML. Brown written SPEC is already clear enough, and the whole thing will be wrong because you don't have a good relationship with others. Efferson: How can you say this? This is not reasonable. I ask you to apologize to me. Bruce kicked Malong from the table, looked at Malone, seeking him to go back: Efferson, you will list the questions you found. Now Brown is not, listen to you, we don't know. What is the truth in the end? I only know that Tester finds a lot of problems, and these programs are written. This is not necessarily who is the problem, but I have to know how we should solve the situation in the face. Now you first sort out the questions you found. Efferson went out and vigorously closed the door. Maron: Bruce, why don't you let me talk? Bruce: In order to maintain the harmony of the team. Malone, I know that you have always been right, but you will make the scene very stiff. I have to comply with the country ... Most people have a harm of the team's ideas, in fact, the leader of the tip, and a moving team, a one-way team, is actually not in real life. Too easy to exist. Most teams have the kind of person who speaks, and people who are not talking. Good speaking, a good gentleman is actually similar to a single cell life. In principle, they will believe that "Jun wants to die, Chen Chen does not dare to die" this philosophy.
