"Hacker Empire" or two sides of the reverse

zhaozj2021-02-16  60

Slavoj Zizek, Slovenia. He is the theorist from the future country but in the West. Zezek has studied in Paris, specializing in structuralism, especially Lagon. Today, he is the most important heir of Lagon tradition. He uses Hegel and Kant to explain well, and also use political and mass culture to prove Kanda. He deepened and developed the theory of Lacon, and gave it to all fields. Zezek's academic style is to promote mental analysis, subjectivity, ideology, and mass culture in a furnace, thereby promoting a new philosophical field. Zezek has achieved great success in the European and American academic circles, and he is now popular in the philosophy, literary circles, and has an impact on sociology and political science. Zezek is now rushing to Europe and the United States, accepts interviews, attends meetings, and speaking, holding a lecture, and he also inherited the interventional tradition of the left, once elected President Slovenia. Zezek's huge reputation in the West can be used to compare with Edward Sai Deide, with Sai Yabolin, Julia Christi. Jameson said: "I have issued an incompetent voice, we will repeat listening in the next few years"; Irgerton evaluation he is "one of the most important thinkers in Europe for nearly a year".

When I watched the "Hacker Empire" in a local cinema in Slovenia, I happened to sit next to this movie, that is, an idiot. This twenty-six-year-old young man sitting on the right is so investment, so that he has been using a loud excitement to disturb other audiences, saying that "Wow, God, so there is no realistic! "... compare more intelligence interpretation - they put fine philosophical or psychology to the movie, and will absolutely prefer the innocent investment in the former. 1

However, the challenge of "hacker empire" is quite easy: Is it a movie with an effect of Luo Xia psychological test? Luo Xia ink Test created a popular cognitive test method [its website: http://roSchach.test.at/]. Just like the well-known God, no matter where you look, he seems to always look straight to you - in fact it provides identifies to yourself from every angle. So my La Kang fans said to me that the film's scriptwriter must read the work of Lacang; the Frankfurt school scholars will definitely see Matrix3 as the cultural industry, considering the social wealth (capital) of the specific symbol of alienation, Take over and colonized our inner life, regarding our energy sources; and young people living in the new century, we have seen that our world is just a marine building, it is made by the international broadband network Global thinking is constructed. This issue returned to the ideal country of Plato: "Hacker Empire" is not repeating Plato's cave fables - ordinary people become prisoners, tighten in the seat, forced watching the so-called realistic strange image (they mistaken this is reality)? Of course, "hacker empire" and its important difference lies in that when some people escape from their cave dilefry, they are no longer the bright space that is sunny, but the beautiful beauty, but "Real Desert". Between the Frankfurt School and Lat-Kanists: We should define Matrix as the historic metaphor of cultural and thinking colonial capital, or symbolize the sequence itself? However, if the latter is wrong? If the virtual role of the symbolizing sequence "itself" is a very state of history?

Arrive at the end of the world

Of course, design a protagonist, living in the artificial world that is fully manipulated and controlled, this idea is not original: "Hacker Empire" just brought it into virtual reality, making it more thorough. The key to the problem here is whether virtual reality can subvert tradition, which itself has a fundamental ambiguity. On the one hand, virtual reality makes our rich sensory experience, not only to letters, even reducing the minimum 0 and 1 digital sequences, that is, those electronic signals passing and not passing. On the other hand, this digital machine has produced "simulation" experience on reality, which seems to be difficult to distinguish between "real" reality. With the constant erosion of the concept of "real" reality, the virtual reality has therefore become an extreme proof of the temptation of the image. If a person lives in California, California - That is the consumer's paradise - can suddenly be skeptical, the world of life is just a fictional environment, one let him confine him to life In the public stage in the real world, the surrounding people are just some training-sufficient actors, or the temporary actors in this huge performance. Is this the most extreme American deli mad job? The nearest example is the "Chu Gate's World", Jin Kelly plays a civil servant in a small city. He gradually discovered the truth of things: he was a master of the TV show 24 hours uninterrupted TV show, his hometown In a huge studio, the camera is always tracked with him. Sloterdijk's "Sphere" is really known here: a huge blonde in the film surrounds and isolates the entire city. The last play of "Chumen's World" seems to be a liberation, and Jin Kelly broke the sewing of this world's ideology, and rushed into its external space. This external space could not be seen from the inside of ideology. of. However, if this film's "Happy" ending (we must not forget, millions of people around the world can't help but applaud when watching this movie last few seconds), that is, the owner is rushing out, as if we So guided to miss, he is looking for his true love (so we have a model of love outcomes!), It is precisely another most meaning ideology? Perhaps, ideology also exists in such a belief, that is, in addition to this limited universe, there is a "real reality" waiting for us to enter? 4 In the predecessors who hold this insight, it is necessary to mention the "Chaotic Time" of Phillip Dick (Time Out of Joint, 1959). In his work, the 1950s, the protagonist of the novel is a simple life in the pleasant California small town, but he gradually discovered that the entire town is just a fictional stage to satisfy his satisfaction ... "Time" The potential meaning of "The World of Chu Gate" is that capitalist California consumer paradise is beyond reality with an untrue, non-substance, lost material inert, and beyond reality. So, not only the appearance of the real life of the material entity, not only in Hollywood, but also in the recent capitalist consumption society, "real social life" itself also requires people on the fictional stage, our neighbors Just like those stage actors, they express as living in the "real" life ... The capitalist utilitarian world lost her spiritual significance, and the ultimate truth, that is, the "real life" itself, it turned into it The above strange performance.

In the field of science fiction, we must mention Brain Aldiss's "Starship". In his novel, a group of tribe members were left in the pipeline of a huge star ship, which was a closed world, which was separated by the remainder of the star, they didn't know on their heads. There is another world; in the end, several children crossed the bushes and arrived at the outside world and was welcomed by other tribes. In those men who are more old, more "Time", people may remember George Seaton's "36 hours" (36HURS), this early 1960s, the film told an US official [James Jamess Garner plays] He knows all the plans to land on Normandy, but it is accidentally captured by the Germans before landing. Because he was arrested, it was coma because of the explosion airflow, the Germans quickly built a "small American army sanatorium", trying to let him believe that he lives in the 1950s, Americans have won in World War I, but He lost 6 years of memory - the Germans did this to think that he can tell them all the plans to invade the landing, then you can prepare it early; of course, the building is so carefully built soon. ... This is the concept of "the end of the world" behind it, of course, the concept of "arriving at the world": In that very famous mandrel, the surprised tricker approached the screen of paradise / shoot, this is a drawing. The stars flashed big plane, strolling this screen, arriving there - this is the last scene that has happened in the movie "Chu Gate". There is no doubt that in the last play of the movie, Chu Gate embedded on the ladder, arrived at the wall to draw "blue sky", and pushed a door, which was obviously Magryt. Togle: This is not said, now, this same feeling is completely returned? This is not like Syberberg's new Passifar? 5 Where an infinitely extended perspective is also obviously the foundation of "artificial" production. This does not show the era of the unlimited perspective of the Cartesi, and we returned to the resurrected medieval non-perspective universe? Frederick Jameson has discovered the same phenomenon from some novels of Raymond Chandler and some movies in Kirk, and the novel "Don't, dear" (Farewell, The Pacific Coast in My Lovely, is a "end / limit" of the world, there is an unknown abyss; while the film "Northwest" is also a similar role in the huge valley of the Presidential Mountain. In the escape, Eva Mary Saudit and Garry Grant fled to the peak. Before the love of Wai-Mary, Gary Grant grabbed her; now some people want to "modern" Revelation "The famous war scene in the front line of Vietnam / Cambodia is added to this series, and the world" surrounding our known world under the space outside the bridge. " So how can we think of this statement, that is, our Earth is not floating in an unlimited space, but in an open round hole, four weeks will always crowd the endless ice, the sun is here.

Isn't this one of the most favorite ideas of Nazi Spirit (according to some reports, they even think of some telescope on Sylt to observe the United States)? "It's really existed"

So what is Matrix? Briefly, it is the "big other" in Lacan, the virtual symbol sequence, which constructs a realistic network for us. This "big other" dimension is the basic composition of the subject of alienation in the symbolic sequence: It is that he is pulling the rope line that is holding the puppet. The main body does not talk, he is the symbolic structure to control "speaking". In short, this "big other" is the synonym of social entities, because of its existence, the main body never fully dominate its own behavior, that is, all the results of all the action of the main body are always deviated from his expectations and goals. . However, the key to point out is that in the key chapter of the "Seminar Xi) of Latcoma, he tried to outline the result of alienation. In a sense, it is an alienation control. The face, that is, after the big part of the big, it is closely detached from the big one. When the main body realized that the big parties themselves were so contradictory, pure virtual, "latched", lost material sex, out of the actions of the big, started - the purpose of fantasy is not to supplement the subject Lack, but it is necessary to make up for the defects of others, that is, to construct (re-constructing) the coherence of other people. For this purpose, fantasy and delusion in the inner way: delusions are essentially, I believe there is still a "other person of others", believe that behind the clarity of the social mechanism, hide another one The planned (let us look this) the consequences of the unopened in our social life, so it also guarantees the edge of others: For example, behind the mid-lost market economy, wait after the death of morality, etc. There is a prominent strategy in Jewish Plot ... This delusion, for our current daily life, has gained more in-depth advances: when our entire (society) exists, in computer network When this big, when you have become more and more physical, you are easy to imagine if an evil programmer eliminates all our digital identity, we will lose our society, we are no longer a society. "People" admitted. The theory of "Hacker Empire" also follows this same kind of technique: a movie, the big one is an elephant that does existing super computer. There is one there - there must be one --matrix, because the situation is wrong, the opportunity is missing, and wherever it is going to be able to ill, "That is, the idea of ​​this movie is that the above situation is Because Matrix has hindered the expression of "real" reality behind it. Therefore, the problem with this movie is not "crazy" because it assumes that there is still another "real" reality behind our daily reality that is maintained by Matrix.

However, in order to avoid this deadly, the opposite said, it is also completely ideological, that is, for "all everything is generated by Matrix", the opposite is that there is no ultimate reality, everything is just The mutual mutual lens is full of endless virtual realistic sequences, which is completely ideologically [maybe, in the "hacker empire" continued, we are very likely to see, "real desert" is just It is already a thing in Matrix in (another). The proliferation of the virtual world will be the proliferation of realities - this reproduces a paradox, some physicists have seen in the nearest particle accelerator experiment. As we all know, scientists are now trying to build an accelerator close to the speed of light, which can impact atoms to make the atomic nucleus. This idea is that this impact can not only make the atomic nuclear cracked into its components - neutron and protons, but also make neutron and protons become powders, leave some "plasma", one by Freely binding particles - energy juice composed of quark and gum. In this case, people have never studied the structure of the substance in this state, as this state is only short after the universe explosion. However, this will lead to a nightmare: If the success of the experiment will create a world's last machine, a devil who destroys the world, it eliminates the ordinary substance around it with unrecognizable necessities, so Just like we know, eliminate our world, what should I do? It has been irony that the end of this world, the disintegration of the universe is proved that this theory is correct, because it will inheat all the substances into the black hole, and then create a new universe, that is Said, the perfect reesence of the universe bombings. Such a paradox is, two opposing statements - 1. A main body drifts from a virtual reality to another virtual reality, this virtual reality is to know that each reality is a completely awake ghost; 2 There is also a realistic delusion that behind Matrix - it is wrong: they have ignored the truth. "Hacker Empire" insists that there is no truth behind the simulation of virtual reality, this is not wrong, when Mo Physsen is going to see Chicago ruins, he said: "Welcome to the real desert." But, true It is not the "real reality" behind the virtual, but to make the reality become incomplete / unconstably empty, each with symbolic Matrix, its function is to conceal this incoherent, complete this concealment One of the ways is claiming: there is another reality behind our incomplete / incoherent reality, which is built from endless imply. "Big other people do not exist"

"Big Hundred" also represents a common sense, a person who can reach after free thinking; from philosophy, its recent outstanding version is Habermas's social interaction, including coordinated management idea. This "big other" is a thing that gradually collapses today. The society we have today is a complete separatist: On the one hand, the objective language used by experts and scientists can no longer be converted into ordinary languages ​​that everyone can understand, but in the way to talk about this idiom language. This discourse is all around. Although no one can truly understand, these words have taught our attractions in the world (for example, black holes, universe bombings, super string theory, quantum shock ...). Not only in natural science, in the field of other economic and social sciences, professional jaices are seen as an objective cave, anyone can't question, but also cannot translate into our daily experience. In short, in science, the gully between the common sense is not spanning. It is this gully to rising scientists to be popular with cultural people, becoming "subject to things" (such as Stephen Hawko phenomenon) ). This objective reality is a serious correspondence, we have a cultural point of view, and there is a world with a pluralistic lifestyle. Everyone cannot translate into another person: what we can do is to ensure this state, A diversified society to accommodate their coexistence. Today's image may be a Indian programmer, during the day, he performs very well in professional skills, but at night, he got home, giving local Indian gods, respectfully, to respect the Holy Bull. Sike shows this split. According to the Sike, all people have lived in an earth village; however, the truly happened is that we were bombed from the huge amount of information belonging to this unbelievous city - we have a lot "Little House", a large number of our own choice of the genus special identity, replacing the earth village. It is necessary to avoid such a misinterpretation: LaCC is non-scientifically narrative, so that it is a kind of political correct myth. This myth includes: "Touch the truth", its knowledge is indeed "truth" - only Lacon believes that science is a good thing, this is a deadiest, which is a stalemate, that is, scientific knowledge is not Become a symbolic "big other person". In modern science and Aristotle's philosophical Ben, the separation between common sense is difficult to span: it has already appeared in the era of Galido life, and now it is now pushed to the extreme. In quantum physics, we use effective rules / laws to cope with everything, although these rules / laws cannot be returned to our realistic experience to be described. Risk sociology and its global anti-provincial awareness is correct, it emphasizes that if all the generalist's theories in classical enlightenment sports, all fundamental issues can pass the experts after a long period of time. "Objective knowledge" is answered, so now, we are in the opposite side of things: When we face various conflicts from a new product (such as genetic correction of vegetables) When you comment, you want to find the final expert opinion is futile. The key to the problem is not only the essence problem is blurred, because science has achieved corruption through major companies and government agencies, even in science itself, science can not provide answers. The ecologist predicted 15 years ago, the ridiculousness of our forest - but today's problem is that trees grow too fast.

However, risk and sociology said that it emphasizes those ridiculous difficulties. These so-called dilements have been forced to make a decision over and over again. Although we are very awake, we have no decisive rights, and our The decision is also arbitrary. Ulrich Beck and his postpartum will be based on democracy to discuss all the feasibility to establish a consensus; but this does not solve the unchanging dilemma: Why is the democratic discussion in the public will result in More correct answers, there are many people in the public. The public's political frustration can also be understood: they receive information they can't make judgments, but at the same time, they are asked to make a decision, that is, objective power is in opposition. Help "conspirase theories" is a way to escape this deadlock, is trying to raise Frederick Jameson called the Minimum of "Cognitive Map". JODI DEAN 6 mentioned an interesting phenomenon, in the "silent dialogue" between official science (ie "serious", college institutionalization) and the so-called pseudo-scientific huge kingdom, People with UFO and those who want to decipher the secrets of pyramids can clearly see this phenomenon: a person can't be touched by such a fact - official scientist is carried out with a desperate attitude of a dogmatic Research, and pseudoologists have helped the facts and arguments that do not contain popular prejudice. Of course, the answer is a recognized scientist to speak with the authority of the scientific institution; but the problem is that the scientific big part of the science is just once again revealed that it is a recognized symbolic fiction. So when we face the conspiracy school, we should strictly learn from Henry James's "screw": We should neither the existence of ghosts as part of the reality, nor Take them in a way to find them into the projection of the female protagonist frustrated. The conspiracy learns certainly can't be used as "facts", but a person cannot analyze it into a modern group hysterical disease. This proposal is still the building in "Big Hundred", the building is in the "normal" conceptual mode of sharing social reality in the public, so it is not considered that this reality is now collapsed. The problem is not the people who believe in ufo and "conspiracy theory" will retreat to a delusional thinking attitude, and cannot accept (society) reality; the problem is that the reality itself is a delusion. The contemporary experience pushed this situation again and again, that is, our normal attitude and feelings we have established in a symbolic assumption, that is, what is "big he" decided It is normal standard and recognized truth, what is the basis for the meaning of a particular society, and it is not necessary to establish "facts" in the meaning of science "true knowledge". Let us go to a traditional society that modern science has not improved to the mainstream discourse: then in this symbolic space, if a person advocates the proposition of modern science, he will be "expel" as a madman - question The key is that he is not "really crazy" is not enough. This is the society that is short, put him in this position - to some extent, he is really doing " "Treatment of the madman, is abandoned by this" big other ", this society is exactly the same as the real madman.

"Mad" is not a title based on the "facts" ("fact" means that a madman can't take the world, because his heart is firmly occupied by the illusion projection, but only represents The relationship between an individual and the "big". Lagang usually emphasizes the opposite side of this paradox: "The madman is not only to imagine the king, the madman is also the king of the king." That is to say, madness indicates the symbolic and true distance. The collapse, indicating that the symbol is alleged to give him a direct naming; or say that we use another example of it to express: a sick and sly husband's mind is all his wife and others to go to bed, then if he is confirmed It is correct, his wife does hear a bed, his jeal is still a morbidity. We can clearly learn from this paradox: the morbidity is not related to the fact that the facts become erroneous, but how these facts are integrated into the mainstay of sexual desire. However, it can be claimed here that this paradox can also happen in its opposite side: the society (its social symbolic field, the big one) is "sound", "normal", even if it is proved to act It is wrong (maybe, this is because, the late Lacon will define himself as a "psychiatric patient": he has reached the extent of mentally ill patients, because he can't hire your own words. In the domain). Some people tried to claim to declare in the Kant's philosophical model, the mistake of conspiracy theory is the same as "pure theory", and the following is similar: First, doubt (for the sought of scientific, social, common sense, etc. ) Is used as a formal methodology, one is to confirm this suspicion using another global transcendence of all interpretation. Shielding true

From another position, "Hacker Empire" is also a shield that will be unbearable, so that "real desert" becomes "shielded". However, it is this, we should not forget the true fundamental ambiguity of Laikang: Lacan's true is not the end of the illusory screen. - Truth is, and first is the screen itself, It is always ready to distort the perceived obstacle to the realistic obstacle to the referred to. In the philosophical discourse, this is in Kant and Hegel's difference: To Kant, true is the body, we are "systematic" through the screen awards in a priori; and speaking to Hegel, In contrast, as he said in his "spiritual phenology" introduction, this congenital screen interval is wrong. Hegel uses three terms in the introduction: When the screen is involved in our own and true, then it will always generate what is "inside the screen), so" " For us, the gap between the appearance and the inside of them is always always set. As a result, if we extract the entity from the distorted screen, we also lost the entity itself (in religious terms, the death of Christ is God's death, not just the death of him as a person) - this That is why Latcoma followed Hegel, the entity itself, that is, the object being finally gained, not the perceived object. Therefore, returning to the "hacker empire": Matrix itself is distorted our realistic sense of realism. Levi Strus In the structure anthropology, he refers to an example of a Wennebago (Winnebago) in the Temple of the National Five Lake District of North America, perhaps help us. He describes the spatial processing of the building of the building. This tribe is divided into two subsets (half families), "those who are on the people" and "those who are under the people"; when we ask these two half-family two individuals to draw on the paper or sandy sand The plan of her village (the space of the farm) depends on which subcomponents he / she belongs to, we will get two trivial answers. Both people will regard their villages as a circle; but for one of the subgroups, the circles of the Central Room area of ​​another subgroup are within their own circumcord, so that we have two concentric circles. And for another subgroup, this circle was clearly divided into two halves by a divided line. In other words, members of the first subpopper (let us call "conservative cooperators") make the village's plan views more or less balanced around the central temple built by the house; As a member of the subgroup (we call the "Revolutionary Anti-Anti-Angist"), he / she regards her tribe as two piles divided by an invisible border ... Levi- Strus's center view is that this example will definitely not enable us to enter cultural relativeism, depending on social space depends on the observer's community identity: two "relative" opinions have a constant fact - - Not a guest audience, "indeed" spatial segmentation, but the core of the creation, the fundamental confrontation makes the village residents can't show the unbalanced symbols in social relations, to explain, come to "adapt" to compromise. This imbalance prevents the community from solidifying itself in a harmonious whole. Two different perspectives of plan views are the mutual exclusive groups to cope with both efforts to be truck-enactive, they rely on the structure of this balanced symbol.

The confrontation between gender is also the same: "Men" and "Female" are not like the structure of two houses in the village described by Levi Strauss? To avoid this wrong concept, that is, our "evolution" society is not affected by the same logic, then remember how we divide the political area into "left" and "right wings" is enough: a left-wing molecule and A right-wing molecule performance is completely a member of the two subpopulations of the villages in the village of Left Rus. They not only occupy different positions in the political area; each of them is also a completely different insights in the political segmented - a left-wing molecule believes that this area is born by some fundamental confrontation, and the right-wing molecules believe a society The organic monitors are only disrupted by foreign invaders. However, Levi Strus puts forward a more critical insights here: Because, although these two subgroups form the same whole, the same tribe, live in the same village, but this kind of identity, certain The extent must be symbolically engraved - if the entire symbolic expression of this tribe is not neutral, but is determined by a variety of factors such as the basic principles and system confrontation. Levist Rrouse's original title, "zero system", is a system that is relative to the famous supernatural power. This meaningless can refer to there is no determination, because it is only the meaning of the meaning itself, the obsessiveness of the meaning: a special system, but constant, does not determine its connotation - its only function is negative It is pointed out that the presence of social system and indeed itself, negates its absence, and negates the confusion of the former society. Such a zero system allows all members of the tribe to experience the members themselves themselves are the same tribe. So, is the zero system in its puretical meaning is not a ideology? That is, it is not a direct specificization of ideology function of a neutral space? In that space, the social confrontation is wiped, and all members can confirm itself. In order to fight against hegemony, it is not entirely this struggle, that is, how to fight this zero system will be defined by some special energy, colored? To give a specific example: the generation of such a zero system, with the decomposition of social contacts, this social contact is originally built on the straight family or tradition, "Matrix". Is this not a country's modern concept? That is, accompanied by the modern impact, the social system is increasingly built on the tradition of dissenting, and more and more as a "contract" experience. The particular meaning here is that the truth is that the nation is considered to be at least the minimum "natural", a "artificial" identity that is based on the "blood and soil", and from the social system itself " Country, professions: The former modern social system runs as a symbolic entity of "people to be returned" (it is built in unbelicious traditional systems), and the current system is imagined as a social artificial product. It is a need for the rise of the zero system of "Make Diability". This zero system can be used as a common foundation for their neutral.

Then, return to the difference between gender, I tried to adventure to establish such a hypothesis, maybe, and the same logic as the zero system should not only be applied to the integration of a society, but also apply in the social confrontation; the gender difference is not A zero system in human social splits is zero differences in the minimum degree of nature, which is more important than any clear social distinction. It is a compliance of this distinguishing itself? Thus, the struggle against hegemony is once again fighting how this zero difference is determined by other special social distinctions. One person should be in this basis to read Lagon's energy-based patterns, this pattern is important, although it is often overestimated: Lacan will standardize the standards (one above the horizontal line The word "Arbra", the following is painted under the horizontal lines: two words on the horizontal line a one, "man", "woman", then, under the horizontal line, draw two representatives The door of the identity. In order to emphasize this kind of personality difference, Lagang first puts the single pattern of the Saussone, the opposition of men / women, and replaces the difference in the difference between gender; but stored in this fact The real surprise is that there is no difference between the differences in the idea of ​​imagination (on the pattern, we have no status of the gender, such as a man and a simple drawing of a woman, Like the most common situation in today's washroom, it copies two other doors). So, is it possible to express it with a clear term? That is, the gender difference does not indicate any physiological opposition established on the "real" props, but is just a symbolic opposition. This opposite is no corresponding objective object - just some uncertain X Real, this is really unable to be captured by imagination. Back to Leidi - Strauss An example of the two drawings of the village: In this example, people can clearly see that the real introductory is accurate after the distortion. First, we have got "indeed" "Objective" housing, then two different symbols, both symbolic symbols are distorted in a distortion. However, the "real" here is not a real arrangement, but the social confrontation core, which distorted the view of tribe members on true confrontation. Because we have been distorted by distortion, it is therefore denying X (by way of manner, this triethically division method and Freud's three-way analytical: dream The real kernel is not a potential consciousness of the dream. This latent conscious can be replaced / translated into a clear text, and it is unconscious desire, this desire will be recorded in the twisted process of clearing the clear text). This is also the same in the art scenes today: Here, it is true that it will not return, that is, if it is used, it is guilty of excretion appliances, corpses, dog manure, etc. These objects appear in the place where it should not be, but in order to make them should not be there, these (empty-free) places should have already been there, Margir Malevitch " Minimalistic art "is performing above. There is the same relationship between the following two four highly modernized works: a famous painting of Kazmil Virish, "Black Square on the White Surface), one is Mase Du Shang 's art "ready-made materials".

Du Shang will inherent intrinsic properties in the ordinary objects in our daily lives; it is the artist to first account for this (or any one) object, put it in a specific location, and become an artwork - becoming an art The key is not "why", but "where". Then Malevich's minimalism is to restore - intervals - this situation encounters this peak, this empty situation (or architecture). His way is to rely on the modified magical magic, change all items, as long as they are discovered possible to become art. In short, Du Shang's work has Marcevic: Only when the artistic practice is from the architecture / situation itself, it is in the process of "ready-made materials". Before Marcevic, a small fool is just a urine, even if it is placed in the most famous gallery. Excretation utensils in inappropriate places and an empty situation, as well as the empty architecture itself, and all three are closely related. Therefore, "true" in contemporary art has three dimensions, some degree of real imagination - symbol - Repeat of truly triplets. Here, the real first is the distorted dirt, distorted the realistic distortion of reality, is a distorted imagination, a "subjective" objective realistic pure epigeval. Then, the truth is a situation in which it is empty, as a structure, a structure that has never existed, it has never experienced, it can only be constructed in the traceability, so it must be presumed - here is symbolic structure. Finally, it is true "itself" that is really "itself" that is really "itself". This last fact, if it is honest, it becomes a pure idol, its fantasy / tempting presentation, the real set of the structure, the same, in a pure anti-Semitious consciousness, true is The Jews appear as excretion tools, covering the "structure" true, namely the social opposition. The true three dimensions finally led to three modes, and learned from the "ordinary" reality: one is to succeed in distortion and deformation; one is to advocate all the objects of all the situation, one to extract / Eliminate all the contents of the reality (object), and finally left, only the empty space that once filled with the object. Freud type brush

In the "Hacker Empire", the falseness that is most direct to directly defend, is it to define Nio to "unique people." Who is a unique person? In the entire social relationship, there is actually stayed early, it is prioritized to leave a unique person in the mainstream energy refers to the authority. In social life, even its most horrible form, the memories of concentration yards always mention the unique person, one who will not be crushed, and amazed in the unbearable situation, And exudes "incredible" spirit and dignity, but others are only struggling for survival - in Lache terms, we can use "there is a person there" (Y'A de I'un) The function is interpreted: Even in that case, there is also a unique person, he supports the minimum unity, opposing the cooperation of social relationships only to do it in a simple survival strategy. Here, there are two points. It is crucial: First, this individual is always seen as a (never had a bunch of such people, like some kind of fuzzy needs, the extreme hard-speaking magical unity is only Can be more embodied in one person); second, it is important to do anything important to others, but it is better to say that he is in the middle of them, but he is not as good as it is in the middle of them. It is important (he lets others struggling to live down, they are realized that although she has become a living machine, she still has a person's dignity as a person. As with canned jokes, we also have canned dignity, in the concentration camp, other people (unique people) preserved my dignity for me in my location, or more accurately, I passed by others Keep my dignity: I may fall to the situation where the survival and tragic struggle, but I think there is someone there, he maintains his dignity, which is enough to continue to maintain the minimum link between humanity. Usually, when this unique person is uniform, or it is exposed, it is a fiction, and the rest of the imprisonment will lose the will of the live, become a walking dead - ridiculous is that they are struggling for a line of life. An exception to each of them - that is, a person does not lose dignity in this state, then when this exception disappears, the struggle of the struggle itself lost its power. Of course, this means that the unique person is not considered only because of his "real" characteristics (from this level, maybe there have been more individuals like his, or maybe he is not Really uniform, but it is a fictional, he is just playing that role): His alone role is just a transfer, that is, the position he occupies is constructed (or preaching) by others. In the "hacker empire", the opposite, this unique person can see that our daily reality is not true, but it is a virtual world that is compiled, so he will become a person who can take it, you can manipulate and beyue virtual The rules of the world (such as flying in the air, can stop bullets ...).

This unique person is a vital feature, he can make real virtualization: reality is a manual structure, its rules can be interrupted, or at least to rewrite - this exists a completely delusion concept, ie This unique person can resist true ("I can pass the thick wall, if I really decide to do this", that is, most people in us cannot be in the failed of the mainstay. However, at this point, the movie is still not deep enough: in a memorable scene, that is, in the waiting room of the female prophet, Nio saw a child in his will Bending the spoon, which makes Nio amazed, let him understand that the way can do this is not the key, not to persuade yourself, I can bend the spoon, but to persuade yourside, there is no spoon ... but What is myself? Does the movie should not go deep into the realm, accept the proposition of Buddhists: I, I own, this subject does not exist at all? In order to further illustrate the virtual virtual "hacker empire", we should distinguish between techniques and false false: Time travel is (roughly) impossible, but the fantasy scene for this is "true", because of these The scene unopened desire deadlock. Therefore, the problem of "hacking empire" is not its stunt in science, the nuja trick: through the phone to complete the truth between reality and virtual, this idea is very meaningful, because what we need is a seam / a hole to let us You can escape (maybe, a better idea is toilet: This place where we will disappear after we rushed to the toilet, which was originally in the original, the chaos before the ontology, became the imagination of the disappeared object, Is this not a powerful metaphor? Although we are reasonable to know what the excretion is later, but imagine myths still insist - excrement is not needed for our daily life, it is a redundant object, and Lagang This is correct: When an animal has doubts about how to deal with it, the excretion report has become a more than a few items that are born, and we are at that moment from animals into humans. True is therefore not at all From the toilet, the extremely disgusting substance, but the hole itself, the slit of the channel to another body sequence, the topology of the topology, or "bending" of our real space of our real space, so We perceived / imagine that excretions disappeared into another dimension, that dimension is not part of our daily reality). The problem of "hacker empire" is its huge contradiction between illusion. In Mofis (resistant African American, I believe that Neo is a unique person) trying to explain to Nio, still foggy. It is more clear when Matrix is ​​emerging - he wonders to a fault in Matrix and the universe structure: This is the feeling of you will experience in your life. I feel what problems in this world. You don't know what the problem is, but know it there, just like a fragment in your mind, you can't get rid of you. / ... / everywhere, it is everywhere, it is everywhere, even here, this room. / ... / is the world blinds your eyes, so you can't see the truth. Nio: What is the truth? Mofish: The truth is that you are a slave, Nio. You, like all of the other people, born to be slavery ... You are trying to do in a prison, you can't smell, you can't taste it, you can't touch it. This is the prison of your mind.

Here, the film has encountered its ultimate contradiction: the experience of lacking / contradictory / obstacles is assumed to be a prove to the following facts, that is, the reality of our lives is just a virtual - but, in the end of the film, Smith, Matrix The agent gives a completely different, more Floyd explanation: Do you know that the first Matrix is ​​to be designed as a perfect human world? There, no one suffers from pain, everyone is very happy? But it is a disaster. No one will accept this program. The entire outcome / uses humans as a battery / failure. Some people think that we have not designed this ability to describe a perfect world. But I believe we have, as a biological species, human beings define their reality as the reality of pain and misfortune. The perfect world is your dream that you can't believe in my low equality. So this is why Matrix is ​​redesigned to this: your peak of your civilization. The imaging of our world's world is also a symbol of its virtual and its reality. A person can be strongly claimed that the agent Smith (we don't forget, he is not like someone else, but Matrix - the big her - its direct virtualization) plays the world in the movie Deconstruction role: His experience is that the experience that cannot be surpaid, let us (human) regard some things as a realistic absolute state - and the reality will eventually become the resistance of obstacles. Hollywood Malebranch

Further conflicts are about death: Why is a person who is only died in the virtual reality of Matrix control, he is "really" dead? "Hacker Empire" offers such a foolish answer: "Nio: If you are killed in Matrix, you will die here (that is, not only in the virtual reality, in real life Dead)? Mofis: The body is not survived. "The logic of this answer is that your" real "body can only maintain vitality (maintain function) in the connection of thought, this thinking means you immersion In the thinking world: So, when you are in virtual reality, it is killed there, this death also affects your true body ... Obviously, the opposite answer (you are only killed in reality is really dead It is also too superficial. The impression of the problem is: Is the subject to completely caught the virtual reality of Matrix control, or he does not know, at least is the real situation of doubting things? If the answer is, then, the expression of the Adam and the forefront will make us immortal in virtual reality. Therefore, it has been disconnected from virtual reality, it should be able to fight from the agent Smith Survive, because this struggler is internally inside the virtual reality that is controlled by Matrix (also he can also stop the bullets of the bullet, he should make the gun injury hurt his body is not true). This allows us to return to Malburla's dupmentation: Compared to the spirit of Berkeley, the ultimate Matrix is ​​the even God of Mararra. Malberlan's dualisticism is undoubtedly the best discussion of this philosopher to explain the virtual reality. Malburla, a disciple of a Cartesian, abandoned the ridiculous of the cracks about brain pine fruit, Diqi said to explain to the existence of the material and the existence of the spirit, that is, the flesh and There is a coordinated consistency between the soul; however, if the two is actually unrelated, not only a soul can be used for the body, and vice versa, then how can we explain the coordination between the two? ? Because of these two reasons of networks (I think about the network and physical interconnection of ideas) are completely independent, the only explanation answer is that there is a third party, that is, a real entity (God), it is here The two are constantly coordinated, maintaining the coherence of the surface: When I think of my hand in my mind, my hand really raised, let me raise my hand is not straight but "accidentally "- aware of my thinking directly to raise my hand, God launched another substance, the cause of the chain reaction, which caused my hand to be effectively raised. If we replace the "God" into the big one, then the symbolic sequence, we can see the closer connection between the ancestors and the position of Lacone: Lacon with "TV" against Aristotle, 11 he thinks the body The link between the soul is never directly, because the big part will always be built into two. Therefore, it is the synonym of "can refer to the name" synonym, which is "can refer to the authority", is the synonym of the crack of the network and the flesh (real) network. It is the synonym of the following facts, that is, the big he is solved. The coordination between the two networks is consistent, so when my body bits an apple, my soul experiences the pleasure.

The same cracks were also treated by ancient Antaik monks: he organized human sacrifice activities to ensure that the sun raised again: here, sacrifice activities as a coordination between the following two First, there must be a flesh that is sacrificed, one is a series of interconnected symbolic events. The sacrifice activities of the Zharta Ke may seem to be "irrational", but it potentially premise is the consistency of our physical and soul. It is much better, that is, said, When I bite an apple, my pleasure is "nature", because this feels directly from Apple: So bigties in reality and our spiritual experience of the realistic experience, playing the uniform character of the two coordinated intermediary characters . So don't we fall in a virtual reality? In the virtual space, when I raise my hand to push an object, this object is really moving - my illusion is of course, is my hand movement directly caused the displacement of the object, that is, in my deep In the immersion (in virtual reality), I overestimated the complex mechanical device coordinated by the program, and the role of the conclusion that the conclusion of God was in ensuring the coordination of the two. 12 Many "closing" press in the elevator is completely a functional disorder, which is a well-known fact. This button is placed there. It is purely to give people an impression: they participate in and add the speed of the elevator run - when we press this button, the elevator door is completely closed at the same time, then We just pressed the buttons of several layers, there is no second time to press the "Close" button to "speed up" there is a process. This extreme certificate about fictional participation is also the right metaphor of each of us involved in the "postmodern" political process. This is the purevant meaning of the anory: According to the theory of Mahalla, we will always press such a button, which is God's constant activities to let them and follow the incident (the elevator door closed) Maintain coordination, but we think that this incident is because we press the button ...

How will the Cybernet affect our lives: This does not depend on the technology itself, but depends on its social naming method. Immersed to the Saibu space to strengthen our physical experience (new feelings, new body, new body, new experience ...), but this also opened a possibility, that is, the manipulation The people who run the machine, but really stealing our own (virtual) body, deprived our ability to control it, so like people and "herself", people and his body is no longer Related links. One person is here to be swallowed and the concept of this concept: 13 This concept is the original definition that a subject is deprived of his right to make a decision directly; the master of politics is Napoleon, he was Distribute the monarchy of the symbolism, and those monarchs no longer occupy their position. On a more common level, a person can say this, a "return" monarch is the definition of the monarch constitution: in the constitution of the monarch, the power of the monarch only has a symbolic attitude of this form of this form, but the expression The symbol of the decree is therefore imposed of this function, and the contents of these declines are defined by the elections. Today, although it has been made important amendments, our daily life is not the same as the same situation? In the process of continuous computerization, the subject is also increasing "an affiliate", in the wrong pseudo-pseudo installation of power growth, but does not be deprived of power? When our body became an affiliate (captured by the electronic network), it also exposed the threat of "proletarization" at the same time: the subject was potentially reduced to just pure $, because even my own personal The experience can also be stolen by the mechanical people, the manipulated, controlled. One person can see again, and how the status of the computer in Malagia is full of complaints in the status of Malburra, how to give us a complete virtualization prospect: because the computer coordinates my mind and (I experienced) my limbs (in virtual reality) inter-sports relationship, one person is easy to imagine, if a computer lost the temperance, behavior is like an evil devil, disturbing my mind And the coordination between my body's own experience - as the signal I want to raise your hands in a consciousness is delayed or even in the (virtual) reality, as the most basic basis of "my own" body The experience is eroded ... At this point, it seems that the Shuibo space is therefore powerful, and Schreber, Schreber, and the illusion of illusion. Freud analyzed his papers: 14-line "The universe is a disorder, because it seems to be physically syndrome of Shulebo's illusion about the sacred light, he said through this sacred light, God controls human thinking In other words, the specificization of the big part of the computer does not explain the inner delusion dimension of the line universe? Or, then change one: In the Saiber space, the ability to download to the computer is finally from them. The body is liberated - also liberate the machine from "their" owner ... this is a often talking about it. Basic fantasy

The last scene in the movie, Nio announced the final contradiction between the state of human liberation. Due to the results of Niio intervention, "system failure" appeared in Matrix. At the same time, Nio as a savior to people who still trapped in Matrix, he taught them how to liberate itself from Matrix's constraints - they can break nature The law can be curved, can be fly in the air ... But the problem is, all of these "miracles", only in the virtual reality of Matrix control, and only distorted or changing its Rule: Our "real" state is still Matrix's slave, but we only have to change some extra power of the rules of our thinking prison. So get out from Martix, go into "real reality" kind? "Real Reality" is that we are tragic creatures living on the surface of the earth destroyed. From Adorno's point of view, a person should claim that these contradictions 15 are the real moment of movies: They identify the confrontation of our new capitalist social experience, identifying a pair of concepts involving basic ontology Identify a pair of confrontations involving basic ontology, such as reality and pain (reality disturbing the rule of happiness), freedom and system (freedom just hinders the system that is fully deployed). However, the final power of the movie is placed on a completely different level. Many years ago, a series of movies called by science fiction, such as "Zardoz)," Logan's Run "predicted today's modern dilemma: a group of isolated groups isolated with the world. The area has a sterile life, they are eager to experience the real world of the substance. Before the postmodernism, Utopia is the truth of the history time, and entering a effort for other people who do not have time. In digitized memory, postmodern will overlap "the end of history" to the past, in the past, at this time, we will see life in Utopia that lives without time is daily ideology. Experience, Utopia has also become the true, memories of historical self, memories, and desire for real past traces, to find out the original real odor and rotten attempts. "Hacker Empire" finally reversed this reversed, combined with Utopia and anti-Utopia: our reality, which is the unreffective Utopia we manufacture for us, and we can be effectively succumbed to this passive Places in the state where we have become a battery that provides energy to Matrix. So, this movie is not in our center theory (ie, the reality we experience is "Matrix", the artificial virtual reality that directly connects to the supercomputer in each of us. Instead, there is an important imagination, that is, millions of people are living in the birthplace of water, suffering from closing phobia, and strive to keep all the normal to provide energy (electricity) to Matrix.

So when the (some) people wake up from their virtual reality of Matrix control, this kind of awake is not to understand the huge space to open into external reality, but first recognize this horrible, in In this closure, each of us is just like a fetus, immersed in the amniotic fluid before birth ... this absolute passiveness is to maintain our consciousness experience in the subject, self-positioned subject matter - - It is absolutely ridiculous fantasy, which is proposed to maintain the ultimate means of maintaining others (Matrix), and they take energy from our lives of the battery. This proposition has a true survival track: why Matrix needs human energy? The purely affirmative answer is, of course, the most unconscious answer: Matrix can easily find another source of energy, this energy is the coordination of virtual reality does not require extreme complex arrangements (why Matrix is ​​not Each individual is in his / her own only my artificial world? Why do you have to complicate things, to coordinate procedures so that the entire human beings live in the same virtual world?). The only one-one answer is: Martix survived by human sweat energy - this has returned to the basic theory of Lacon, and the big parties themselves are very different from the machines that are called an unknown. They need to evolve the sweat energy. . That is how we should turn to the movie to provide us. The movie provides the scene we realized our true state, it is its opposite side, which is the basic fantasy of our survival. Direct contact between sexual mistakes and Saiber space is a long talk today. According to the standard point of view, sexual mistakes show "negative castration": sexual error can be seen as a resistance against "sexual and death" theme, but also the threat of mortality and the zone of gender The forced acceptance resistance: Anti-normal behavior is such a world, in this world, like in cartoon, one can escape any disaster; adult behavior has become a game with children; It is not forced to receive death or forced to choose your own gender between gender. In this way, sexual mistakes are the world of pure symbolic sequences, which is not limited by human definition, listening to the world that is free to develop. In the above mentioned method, our experience of the Saiber space seems to be perfectly meticulous world: Cyber.com is not hindering from real inertness, is it only confined by voluntary acceptance? Is the virtual reality in the "Hacker Empire"? We live in the "reality" lost its ruthless personality, becoming a top floor of a special model rule (imposed by Matrix), one person can violate this rule as long as the will is strong ... only, according to the theory of refinement This authoritative concept is not considered, is the unique relationship between the people and the wrong energy sweat. what does this mean? In the "Le Prix Du Progres), one chapter is" Enlightenment Dialectics ", Adorno and Hawke Hoimer, the 19th-century physiologist Pierre Flulan and anesthesia with chloroform anesthesia The debate: Fluond claims that it can prove that anesthesia is only effective for the nerve center of our supervisor memory. In short, when we live in the operating table, we can completely feel the extreme pain, but soon, after waking up, we no longer remember this pain ... for Adorno and Hawkhaimer For this, it is of course a perfect metaphor for the destiny of the desthes on the suppression of natural itself: his body, part of the body, completely feeling pain, but only because of suppression, the subject does not remember.

This in this area contains natural returns to us: we don't know how to be your biggest victim, slaughtering lives. We can't think of this as a perfect fantasy of interaction being abused. script? It is seen as a fantasy script that we actively intervene in the world for the world. No active freedom active is not supported by this fantasy, and there is no active free active active person who lives in this scene that is manipulated by him. 16 An essentials that give this pain assumption in the abuse of abuse. Perhaps, follow the above saying, you can explain the relationship between Hitler and his niece Gilly Robert, in 1931, Gish Robel was found to die in Hitler in the apartment in Munich. . It seems that this kind of declaration of Hitler's metamorphosis will provide "hidden variability", privacy contact and fantasy, to explain his public personality - here is Otto Strasser The plot: "... Hitler off her clothes / then / he likes to lie on the ground. Then she had to cross his face so that he can take care of her closely, let him Especially excited. When this excited reached a climax, he asked her to urinate in his face, which gave him pleasure. "17 Here the problem is that the extremely abuse role of Hitler in this plot has become Fantasy evidence of devastating public enthusiasm - there is no doubt that Gili feels despair and nausea for these rituals. As described above, there is a "hacker empire" hole: it will reverse the two sides of the reverse - on the one hand, it will be deducted from a virtual kingdom that can be suspended; on the other hand, this freedom is The concealed truth is that the main body is succumbed to an absolute instrument.

1. If someone makes the original script (can be found on the Internet) and the movie itself, you can see the director [Wachowski Brothers), who he participated in the creation of the script] quite smart, dropped a lot too straight Pseudo-intelligence, such as the following changes: "Look at them, those machines. Don't think about what they are doing, why do they do this. It is a computer telling them what to do, then they will do it." Evil mediocre. "These self-intentions ignore the key to the facts: the people who are trapped in the virtual world of Matrix and the horses of the massacre and almost reverse status. The other smart move is to delete those very obvious proposal. This method involves some means of east way, that is, the way to escape Matrix control: "You must learn to release your energy, you must learn Release everything. You must take yourself to make your thoughts free. "2. Rorschach Test, Luo Xia ink psychological test, but also known as the Luo Xiaku projection test. The basic principle is that the person's personality features can be shown in human visual perception. Based on this inference, Swiss Psychiatry Rosia has produced a large number of randomized ink charts, and then lets the subject report to see what they see on the panel, which evaluates the psychological state of the subject. - Translation 3. It is the title of "Mercury", and also means that the film dominated everything. Hereinafter, it refers to the computer with the original text. - Translation 4. Let the male people in "Chumen's World" know and give up his body's world, it is the accidental intervention of his father, this is also important. There are two fathers characters in the film, one is actual symbol, a bloody father, one is a delused "true" father, that is, his TV show, this person completely controlled his life, closed in this Protect him in the environment. Pred by Ed Harris. 5. PARSIFAL, originally a Lagna name drama, which refers to the music piece of Hans Jogen, Siberg. - Translation 6. The following is a wide reference when I wrote: See the "Aliens in America" ​​Aliens in America "Consppiraces from Outerspace to Cyberspace, Isaka And London: Cornell University Press 1998 Edition. 7. Claude Levi Strus, "Does Double Standard Do it? "See" Structural Anthropology) New York, 1963, page 131-163, two pictures on page 133-134. 8. See Rastko Mocknik related to the book. 9. French, right. - Translator Note 10. The one, the film is used to seduce the world. - Translation 11. See Yaxi Lac's "TV" (Television), 1987, 10. 12. The main work of Nicholas Malberra is "seeking truth." 13. This feasibility, the Art of Motor, the Art of Motor, Minneapolis, Minnesota University Press, 1995.

转载请注明原文地址:https://www.9cbs.com/read-22728.html

New Post(0)