Although, as an ordinary high school student, it is not very understandable for the IT industry and not much attention. However, the feelings of my own production procedures are probably noticed. I found that now IT industry presents a miscellaneous form. In contrast, China is characterized by many small workshop software companies. As mentioned in my series, most software companies have only a few, even two or three programmers. It can be seen that the Chinese software industry has a strange phenomenon - wants to play the world with a small workshop. Just think of a few people? I think anyone knows that it is impossible. But for those who know the programmed BOSS. This may be inevitable, because the IT industry is like a dream, maybe you can be famous at night. This is more or less for media copying. But if you want to ask, if it is inevitable, then why is there a few more software companies in China? Jinshan company, well-known. But people still use MS Office. Rising is famous, but people Norton do not advertise, they also account for most of them. The red flag Linux is famous, but there are very many people with redhat Linux. Therefore, it is not difficult to see that there are now today's IT industries, which is indeed, which is indeed lacking competitiveness with the international market. Today, Chinese people seem to be the competitiveness of IT lies in the cultivation of talents. This is indeed undeniable. But what is the cultivation of talents? What should they do? Foreign companies? That is not equal to buying firecrackers to put it for others? Our more purpose is to promote China IT industry. It is not to drive world IT. Perhaps, some people will say that foreign companies are technically in order to learn others. Is the development of IT IT is China IT advance? Indeed, it is necessary to join foreign companies. However, the episodes of a bee will become metastasis. If you drive the world IT industry, you don't want to listen, how can people really promote the world IT? In countries who have begun to fill the model education since childhood, can someone can get rid of the shackles of thinking, create development? Even if people get rid of the shackles, due to the educational system from China, the result is in the cradle. Besides, foreign companies are limited. So many talents go, I think they are also affordable. As a result, a group of people have become a small company in China. Or some famous companies. So, these fallen talents found that they could not play their own talents in such an environment, and they were limited by BOSS. Waste youth. We will meet a few other companies, and they think that their company is the owner, and the development prospects are bright. In the end, another small workshop company was born. There are many companies, small workshop companies, have a serious problem. First of all, the company's capital is not high, so it limits the company's programmer's expansion, resulting in the shortage of developers. As a result, many software is in a hurry. Conduct, develop, test, modify, only through several people to complete in a fairly short period of time. How many bugs will be existed like this? If the ordinary applet is ok, if you have commercial software, even the system. So how much threat is caused by the interests of commercial users? Because of this, many companies and individuals do not have too much trust in the domestic software, and use foreign software. Also, due to lack of capital, IT company is not enough, so the product developed cannot be further improved. Then lead the product to be unable to benefit. The company's capital is insufficient. Because the above death cycle, the development of domestic IT has slowed slowly. In fact, domestic IT's potential is very large. Otherwise, so many famous software suppliers, game developers look at China? IT's talent is not very lacking, but it is not very good.
Otherwise, why do many undergraduate computers can't find a job? What is more factors is that domestic IT industrial resources are too dispersed. As in the past, "China is like a plate of shared sand" dozens of programmers form a dozen software companies, independent software companies. This makes it possible to have much effect on the domestic IT industry even if there are more IT talents. Nothing more than increasing the chaos of the domestic IT market and unfair competition. Reduce product quality and related services. This is not the nest. Results Foreign Solders This old fisherman is mixed with water and fisher. Accounting for most of the domestic markets in China. In addition, due to the idea of domestic education. Therefore, many IT talents are unable to play their talents due to factors. In this way, the China IT industry is not only dispersed. A part of the good strength is also lost. In fact, today's IT development is obvious, the so-called degree is important. However, only the degree does not look at the ability. Programmers are different from ordinary occupations. Education is not very important to the development of programmers. First of all, the IT industry has developed very fast. Many undergraduate students have slowly become downwards in the university technologies. Do not see the whole country with only 98 systems, all software uses VC4.0? Therefore, in the rapidly developed IT boundaries, certification is more important than academic qualifications. Education is a static, incomplete ability certificate. The certification is time, integrated, and targeted. China itself is a population big country, and every IT person must be university undergraduate, the entrance standard for work experience in 5 or 6 years. So how can it possible? Furthermore, the University's computer system is nothing more than a little low-level thing, and it has not played more effectiveness in the development. In the society of dragging the machine, who uses no efficiency in the society? Furthermore, users who use Windows are mostly many, and Windows is a good package, and how is it low? As for future Linux is a future, the project is now now. Therefore, the promotion of the IT industry requires people to change from their minds, from academic qualifications. If you come back, let's continue to say the software company. If you think about the idea of the nest - China IT industry. Correct, then we should force small companies to merge into large companies to strengthen the concentration of talents. This is indeed "temperament" of state-owned enterprises, but the nest personal advocates the free development of the law, and forced things is not good after all. So, I personally think it is for the domestic situation. We should borrow OpenSource's thoughts. Gather the domestic scattered IT resources and develop together. This can not only drive the IT industry, but also make domestic IT staff to learn more exchanges. Many domestic companies are the road to foreign companies. However, the environment and situation are different, but the hard is not possible. And as our policy: take our own path. Many domestic IT companies are independent and occluded. The so-called confidentiality does not contain any independent core technology. In this way, even if the software has a serious bug, the time cannot be found in the code (if you find out, the prepared person will not leave this BUG), so many domestic software official version will appear when it runs. many questions. At the same time, since it is not open, if several companies have to develop the same product, they have to spend the same time and money to develop an identical thing. In this way, the programmer's resources are wasteful. The company's efficiency will also be restricted. However, if it is an introduction of OpenSource, you can jointly develop a few companies. As soon as, the code can get an open and effectiveness. Second, you can reduce the company's development cost, because you may only need to pay four programmed money, you can get 10 efficiency efficiency.
Third, due to the mutual communication of the code, it will also increase the technical level of the programmer, which is not a cheap training method. Of course, it is not enough to change from the perspective of development. Because many people now have an illusion. - Software company is the core of the software. In fact, I seem to, the programmer is the core of the software. If a software company has no programmer ... I think this may not be called software company. Secondly, the customer, if it is ignored this, then the company should not mix. Because even if you have developed a good software, there is no good customer service, where is the customer support you? Which is funding? How does the company work? Finally, it is a software company, in my opinion. The company is nothing more than a housing. It is a programmer, and the outside is a customer. The programmer's work is to support the company's development and operation. The company's role is to manage and find potential capital. And customers are the beneficiary of software. Further, the customer has no professional technology after all, even if the source code is placed in their face, I don't have much significance. After all, customers have a variety of problems in use, (I have been asked many of the rare weird problems about the computer) and this for programmers may be very easy to solve. But if you answer the programmer's way you only know the customer used, I think this is certainly not reality. Do you explain why the software you use .NET technology cannot run properly on a customer's computer, say it to them: Our program is written in .net. Your computer is not supported by the .NET layer. So can't run. I think the customer will be answered. At this time, the company's role came. He played the contact of users and programmers. The company feeds back the customer's information to the program, and the programmer feeds back the information to the customer through the company. In this way, it is good to satisfy the customer satisfaction and clear. It is also possible to let the programmer concentrate on their development, not to be bothered by some duplicate issues. The above is some of my ideas and ideas for what I have known to IT. Of course, I am just a high school student. Don't be as deep as you have come. It can be said that my point of view may be a frog in the bottom of the bottom. Therefore, there is a lot of advice to advise the seniors. Let me explain my opinion on the future management method of China's IT border. According to the current situation in my country, as I said, the resource is uniformly applied. Among them, the most important thing is the programmer. In fact, programmers are a resource, a common resource, not unique to a company. The experience of programmers is to be obtained by communicating with each other. Only programmers with full inspection can be better developed. So, I came up with the running mechanism. First of all, customers make recommendations for some computer functions. The software company can then organize and investigate the recommendations of the user. Then finally. Then, find the company that develops related software and signs the agreement with them. Finally, feed the software back to the customer. Customers have new ideas and opinions during use, and then feedback back to the company. The company will return to the proposed investigation and modify the procedure. Rebound back to customers. In this way, the company's software, first reduced its own defects due to many participation. As a programmer may be wrong, a programmer may fail to complete the task in time. However, there will be no more programmers, and all programmers cannot complete the task in time. In addition, a number of companies cooperate. The cost of production will decrease and efficiency will also increase. Moreover, since it is open source, the customer's problem can also be solved directly and quickly. Never use the user to say: Maybe our compatibility with our software itself. The above is just my personal, a queuing service and a high school student idea.
My point of view: Whether the procedure is still thought, only through communication is perfect. So please pay more attention. Studio Software Development Group Webmaster: Beidou Ring Jun huangxiangkui@msn.com
Now, learning is relatively busy. I use three major tools Python C PHP. Of course, there are other languages such as .NET and ColdFusion, etc., just not commonly used. I hope to communicate more.
