Interview Qicking Details (2) Wang Yanling 01-5-10 02:36:28
Second Category: Communication Skills
I have encountered a boss of an audiovisual product company. He has a Ph.D. of physics, and has taught the book in the university. When I learned that I often smashed people with people who changed their work, he said: "Now it is too easy to change, as long as you can write, it is good at communicating with others, this is enough." Although I don't know if I change the work. What he said is as simple, but I am in favor of it: the communication ability of the candidates is very important.
For such problems, the candidates should not only tell the overall situation when answering, and also add vivid examples.
Question 1: How do you let others accept your opinions or ideas?
Analysis: The main examination can get two information from your answer: First, when you try to affect others, it is very comfortable; second, how high is your persuasive ability.
Error Answer: "This is going to see my idea is good. If this idea is very good, people who need to agree with the idea are all, I want them to accept my point of view."
Evaluation: This is an answer. The main examiner wants to know, how do you convince those people who don't agree with you.
The winning answer: "For many years, I have been thinking about this problem. Sometimes, I have found good idea, even great views, I can't be recognized. One thing I agree, the way the view is as important as the view I usually look at this view from the perspective of others, so I can easily find the way to persuade them. "
Evaluation: This answer reflects the exchange of self-in-hearts and convince people's skills. At the same time, the candidates understand the importance of exchanges and speaking people convinced.
Question 2: How do your good friends evaluate you?
Analysis: This problem is designed to examine the personality of the candidate. It seems that it seems that the potential of the candidates is not related to the potential of the candidates. This problem reflects that the employer pays attention to the skills of the candidate, but also pays attention to their character.
Error Answer: "They feel very interesting with me, my biggest feature is to work hard, have fun."
Evaluation: Maybe some people agree with this answer, but there is actually a problem. First of all, this did not answer the question, and the main examinator will suspect that you have no good friends. Second, the main examiner will suspect what is the true meaning of "playing", it is easy to produce Lenovo that is unfavorable.
The winning answer: "My friends are very important to me. The most important thing to get along with them is to trust each other. Because we are very busy, so I can't meet frequently." "I have a few more than a good friend." trust."
Evaluation: Today, any company emphasizes cooperation, emphasizing team spirit, this answer can show the maturity of the candidate. His understanding of your friends and only a few good friends explained the balance of his personal dating. The answer sounds true. It is worth reminding that if your situation does not match this, don't use it, you have to answer truth.
Question 3: How do you get along with your colleagues?
Analysis: This problem is usually asked with the previous question, and is one of the most concerned issues. Through your answer, the main examiner has a more comprehensive understanding of your communication skills and skills. A statist in the labor sector shows that up to 80% of people resigned because they are not good at work with colleagues.
Error Answer: "I can get along with most people." "I will come with someone, I have never encountered people who can't get along. People always encounter people who don't like it, but I can think." "If you really Some people are too annoying, they usually don't stay too long, I will wait, one day they will disappear. "
Evaluation: Like other mistakes, these answered did not have too much problems, but there is still a problem. First, no one can get along with everyone. After the candidates are boasting the Haikou, they will talk about those who don't like it, which sounds a bit before and after. Second, the candidates made a fatal mistake: don't say bad things in others during the interview. Winning Answer: "I usually have to live with my colleagues, and occasionally conflict with others. At this time, I will talk about the conflict itself, and I will not target people."
