光 62 billion sheepskin !!! 21st century China Pearl Harbor !!! (ZT) China Software Industry encounters "6.2 billion" raid delivery person: Knit August 03, 2002 11:12:04 in [Education] Academic] http://www.bbsland.com Chinese software industry encounters "62 billion" raid
The global market is sluggish, Microsoft needs to launch this huge emerging market in the Chinese market; in China has repeatedly frustrated, Microsoft needs a huge victory to reshape the image to reinvigorate the army; just complete the Tang Jun all the way, too need a sign Sexual events come to advertise their own excellence. On June 27th, Microsoft secretly planned a lot of "one arrow three-carved" event surfaced: grand announcement with the Memorandum of Understanding of 6.2 billion yuan with the Chinese State Planning Commission.
Microsoft always gives people a shock, this article "So far, China's largest foreign cooperation in software field", like a giant stone aroused the wave: its power is not just because of amazing numbers, more importantly, A fine moment, this secret planning a long time, completely bypass the two major ministries that dominate the development of China's software industry: the Ministry of Information Industry and the Ministry of Science and Technology (even the basic ventilation of the prior, the confidential work is extremely good!), Successfully provoked a variety of conflicts between major unions. Although it is a pitched, due to the implementation of the implementation of my country's social development plan, the future of social development, its status and role is naturally better than that of the Ministry of Information Industry and the Ministry of Science and Technology, and in the government sequence, it is visible to Microsoft and my country. The cooperation between the government's real rights has increased and increased, that is, the ability to mobilize the resources of my country and the impact on my country's decision-making layers is increasing. At present, it seems that there is no market that can be favored and loved by such many ministries. In this way, a new problem naturally has emerged: Who will lead the development of China's software industry in the future? More importantly, it pushes the road choice problem of the Chinese software industry to a critical juncture: Is it strong support and develop an independent platform, or is it based on the Microsoft platform? The two major camps in the Chinese software industry: "The main battle" and "The Lord and the Lord" are unprecedented, and the direction of directional problems in the Chinese software industry is likely to determine this!
The Associated Press said that the State Planning Commission and Microsoft established a collaborative agency - the State Planning Commission - Microsoft Cooperation Committee, Zeng Pei Yan, director of Ballmer, as director of Ballmer. If this news is true, then Microsoft's influence in China will far beyond the market itself, leading the Chinese market and industrial development at a higher level. Therefore, some persons promoted the development of China's self-developed software, and the "Pearl Harbor incident" in China software industry will be called the Chinese software industry. Of course, Microsoft casts is not a bomb, but a huge amount of money (currently just a virtual number). In the past 10 years, Microsoft has been lobbying and public relations to the Ministry of Information Industry and the Ministry of Science and Technology, but obviously, it is more conceived by Microsoft's true intention of the information industry and the Ministry of Science and Technology to become Microsoft's frustration. After all, in these two sectors, there is a strong force that is shouting for the autonomous software. Microsoft sent the failure of the Beijing Municipal Government procurement, and specially sent CTO to report to certain ministers, but unfortunately because the CTO is too high, the minister does not eat this set, and the report will be returned to the middle, and Microsoft defeated. However, today's Microsoft is another way, successfully knocking another threshold, more and more broad gate, fully showing the extraordinary wisdom of Microsoft government public relations. It can be said that this is the most exquisible foot shot since Microsoft has joined China in this field in 1992.
A agreement without any commitment
In the face of the cost of 62 billion sugar coats, people suspicion and worry are the focus of concern, not in what a clear commitment made, but it is precisely because of the commitment. "Economic Observer" said: "The reporter interviewed the relevant authorities of Microsoft China and the State Planning Commission, learned the truth of the fact: In the signature memo, all commitments were made by Microsoft, and the Bank did not Commitment. "A normal agreement is inevitably the right to rights and obligations, inevitably the exchange of bilateral commitments. Only unilateral commitments must be an inequality agreement. Such an agreement we have seen more in Chinese history, but it is all our unilateral promises, unilateral payment money. Today, we see another scene. Therefore, some people feel very wronged: I have a great victory in China's unremitting efforts, and the governments of the world's governments for Microsoft's first major victory, how can it become another taste?
However, we must ask, is we really enjoying such a huge victory now? Can you really make an IT industry's most powerful monopolists bow down? Another angle can also be asked: A company that entered China's 10 years, has been unbounded, and a company that has recently spent 1-2 million US dollars, how can it suddenly become generous? And don't have anything else, expertise?
A 6.2 billion collaboration, and it is completely unilateral promise that any brain can feel abnormal. Because Microsoft is not a charity, this is not an international assistance plan. China is now there is no power to force others to sign such a "inequally" treaty. This protocol that "no sound at this time" is really needed to care about the people who care about the industry. Why don't you give us a reasonable, equality cooperation agreement that can be placed in the sun, mutual commitment, obvious, whitening? What are you seeing?
Therefore, Microsoft can perform a successful performance in China, let each of the people who truly concerned with the development of the Chinese software will feel stunned and sad!
Thief and Lia: Chinese users and Chinese government in Microsoft
If you carefully pay attention to Microsoft, you will find that although they continue to throw out the packaging lies and the words, they will often leave God, say some inner truth.
What is the image of Chinese users in Microsoft? I think Bill Gates should have the most authority. In 1998, Gates said in the world's famous financial magazine "Wealth" magazine: Chinese people don't spend money, I like steal. But "as long as they want to steal, we hope they steal us." Because users are addicted, because he can calculate the acquisition of the next decade.
Obviously, in the eyes of Microsoft, China's users are "thieves", they need to treat the means of dealing with thieves. Last year, I received more than 10 domestic companies asking emails. Here there is a manufacturing company in Guangdong, there is a cotton mill in Hebei, and there are cashmere sweater in Beijing. They all have the same experience: all received Microsoft legal departments Letter, use the last tone, unless they immediately contact Microsoft's sales department, buy Microsoft's genuine. What is the terrible of these companies is that the above actually detailed that the number of software and machines used inside the company, Microsoft obviously collects confidential information of these companies through some means! Later, I learned that this has become a common sales method in Microsoft! Use corporate confidential information and legal threats as a pre-sales means, in China. In order to sell products, customers' sensitive information will be collected, what will happen in the United States! However, Microsoft has repeatedly tried, because in their minds, the user is "thief"!
Today, Microsoft has also joined the Chinese government. So how do their hearts evaluate? We still let Bill Gates talk about your heart. In September 2000, the famous American investment magazine "Red Herring" published Gates Interview, let's see what he said: "Reporter: Now, the government plays role in standard establishment, for example, think about TCP / IP. I have seen that the Chinese government, there is a French government to make some official assurance, support Linux systems.
Gates: That is not true. Then it is absolutely not true. The government of the two countries is still in a large number of Windows systems. You choose any of these governments, I can show you, have had a lot of contracts in the past few months (they follow us).
......
Reporter: I think, I should take off that China really likes Linux's statement.
Gates: What are you talking about? I think, what you said is that you assume that American media reports on China is reliable. I am very suspicious. Are you reading a news announcement issued by the Chinese government.
Reporter (shakehead): No, of course, I didn't read the news announcement of the Chinese government.
Gates (I am really happy): That's good! Seriously, if you are interested in the facts and your magazine, then this is one of the many cases in this country, in the press of the newspaper media, the fact will be 100%. "
Obviously, in the eyes of Gates, the news announcement released by the Chinese government is fundamentally invisible. However, now, Microsoft is very passionate about frequently engaging in many news announcements with the Chinese government. The authenticity does not know if it is still.
The above is the real Chinese user and the Chinese government in Microsoft, do not know that their conclusion is a needle?
What is the 62 billion to exchange?
If you have a slight study, we can see that the actual content of "Microsoft's 6.2 billion RMB investment" for each media is: "In the next three years, Microsoft promises to order a large purchase value to China in China. Hundred million US dollars and other products. "It seems that this" 62 billion "is not simple investment, which is very artistic. So, for Microsoft, what is the 62 billion to exchange? They don't want to tell people with white paper, but we can also make simple inference, at least the following goals:
1. Successfully enter a hundred billion-level China e-government market. Outside people can only come to comments and guess, we still listen to Microsoft's own most authentic, most authoritative words. The world's largest IT portal CNET reporter interviewed Tang Jun, President Microsoft, China published on July 9, revealed Tang Jun's statement: "Tang Jun said, just signed an agreement with China's highest power firm State Council," They will completely use Microsoft products. "The agreement referred to in the article should be this event. Because its monopoly is harmful, the past ten years, Microsoft is also like the United States in China, repeatedly encounters setbacks, encounters multi-boycots and confrontation. Since then, these obstacles may be eliminated, and Microsoft roads are flat.
2, shaking industrial cooperation, eliminating competitors. Microsoft is high, and 6.2 billion is not cash, but an order that does not lead. It's hard to imagine that in the next three years, I don't know how many companies will have, how many talents are investing in 6.2 billion orders, you die. To obtain Microsoft orders, you must develop products with Windows as a platform according to Microsoft's standards and requirements. It can be imagined. Three years later, even if China's software industry earned Microsoft's 6.2 billion yuan, it will also carry a battle to Microsoft to the success or failure standard, support Microsoft's earned silver and exercise technology, and those The non-Windows platform will fall automatically. Microsoft does not invest in a monthly net profit, it is flattering obstacles to China's "Qianqiu Millennium Generation, and Rivers and Lakes". Of course, things will not be so simple. The reason why Microsoft is so embarrassed, and the big flag is promoting this matter, the biggest value is the news effect, not something itself. Microsoft is nothing more than to deliver a clear signal to the entire China (partner, customers, and the public): Microsoft has been distinguished from general multinational companies, and has obtained the special "intrigue" of the Chinese government, with special background and Identity. Next, Microsoft can use the market offensive to be a Ma Pingchuan! Of course, 6.2 billion irritation is not only the case. For Microsoft, take out your own main business - software development, generously give domestic enterprises, must consider greater investment returns. With such a smooth, Tang Jun also dared to face the media, talked about its naked government public relations: "If Microsoft has 100 cooperation candidate companies, at least 98 have government background."
200 billion "debt" and an industry's future Microsoft's most commonly used payment method, often take its own "currency" - software to deal with their respective donations and investments, and do not need to use a cash of cash. According to Microsoft's current price, 6.2 billion is equivalent to 1 million sets of WINDOWS and Office licensing fees. In the face of 30 million PCs in China, Microsoft only needs generosity, pardoning "1 million unauthorized software" investigations, 6 billion gently floating. More than 200 million yuan, the Ministry of Education is equivalent to 30,000 sets of software licenses. The school uses unauthorized software that is rational use. It is defined as illegal after the Legislation of Microsoft Push Software Hypertrophic Protection.
In addition, according to Microsoft's price, China's market light is genuine for the completion of Windows and Office two software, you need to give it less than 200 billion yuan. Therefore, China is Microsoft's bank, owing its huge sum. In this way, Microsoft is China's largest creditor, which is also the foundation that Microsoft is always overbearing in China! Microsoft can complete all investments as long as you have several orders. For Microsoft, it is not only necessary to break, but also with all the relevant departments of our government, the big Zhangqi can take other more money.
Although such investment does not require Microsoft's headquarters, there is no actual contribution to China's development. However, Microsoft will grasp the flow of the interests of different departments, the operation is proper, and slightly change some of the flow of some interests, you can get the effect of the four-two dial jack. Of course, even if Microsoft is really investment, you can use 6.2 billion to exchange huge purchase orders, or get a special treatment of genuine, you can directly get tens of billions, hundreds of billion, such a return on investment, no one is happy. Of course, more importantly, Microsoft can win the future of our entire industry. Microsoft is said to be an abnormal price of 10 million US dollars, let the surface written "China Software Development Strategic Research Report" on the surface, and submit the Planning Commission. Although a report is minimal than 6.2 billion, it is more problematic: this seemingly objective report is a lot of mystery, completely reflects the will of Microsoft: Let Microsoft have more involved in my country's software talent training and education. Develop strategies and standards, enter key areas and large national projects ... and the core of them is: China completely gives up the development of the independent platform, which is based on the Microsoft platform! Understanding the software industry knows that software is a typical zero-edge cost, high transfer costs, once you get a monopoly status, and then want to break almost impossible. And the people who know the software industry more, with the in-depth of the Internet, the current software industry is facing transformation, once the new application platform is rerouted by Microsoft, the day of the Chinese software industry does not know when. At this time, I made mistakes, I can't change it in the future! In August 1986, the vice premier of the time pointed out at the national soft scientific research work symposium: "In all mistakes, the mistakes of decision make a biggest mistake. If you are cautious, you will lose, 'Great Yuejin' decision The mistakes caused by hundreds of billions of major losses, criticizing Ma Yucheng's topographic population, etc., so that we still have to work hard to eliminate far consequences caused by these major decision-making errors. "Informatization and IT industry to China The importance of future development, no need to talk more! Obviously, Microsoft is not only a huge interest in front of you, but will be the whole future of the Chinese software industry.
Let Microsoft cultivate China Software Industry?
This time, Microsoft CEO Ballmer's most beautiful slogan is: "Our goal is to cultivate China Software industry." But all the history of the software, but I don't know when Microsoft has cultivated which country's software industry? Don't know which software company supports and helps? I don't even know when Microsoft has cultivated which US software company. On the contrary, Microsoft's development history is a naked monopoly history.
Huang Rongyi, President of Microsoft Great China, is more talking: "Microsoft is an ecosystem maintenance." However, overview of Microsoft's development history, everyone can come at a glance. Microsoft has played the role of "super killer" that destroyed market competition in the history of the entire software, and destroyed the market ecology. Country of death, countless: CP / M DOS, OS / 2, Lotus1-2-3, Wordperfect, Mac, Net-view browser, there are Chinese platforms, WPS, input methods, etc., these software industry really originally original technologies and products in Microsoft's perseverance, can be said to be a software history. No one can do it in the software industry.
And Microsoft has gone around the world, and also blessed the local software industry. Whether in the United States or in Europe, in Japan, in Korea, in Taiwan, it has encountered anti-monopoly investigation, competitors Control and consumer protests. Taking the largest office software in the market in PC software as an example, Microsoft uses the monopoly status of the operating system to quickly destroy or suppress the original excellent software around the world, such as the American Lotus 123. And Wordperfect, Japan's 1 Tailang office software, Taiwan's Eternal office software, South Korea's ThinkFree software and China's WPS. In addition to the market, Microsoft will never have extra kindness. This is the success of it to monopolize the market. Therefore, Ballmer's actual goal is only one, so you can occupy the Chinese market as soon as possible, and completely monopolize the market. Make market competition failures, consumers lose their ability to choose room and bargaining, and easily seek excess profits. In addition, everything is the need for props, the needs of performances. One person can understand that Microsoft is a software company, how can I go to the rice bowl, cultivate someone else's software industry, send my own software business, cultivate my own competitors?
Software real lie
Monopoly is the foundation of the Microsoft Empire, Microsoft is the most fearful thing to lose monopoly. Monopoly is very strong, and it is also very fragile: as long as the industry has a new competitor, the market is torn open, so monopolistic prices and market leadership may therefore have problems, and trigger a terrible negative cycle. Recently, Microsoft's frequency public relations only illustrates a problem: Microsoft has crisis and threats in China's monopoly. Microsoft must in time to suffocate these competitive ports that have just emerged.
What is the biggest lie in the software industry, that is, Microsoft said: "Microsoft only does platform". This replicated discourse from the early 1980s has already proven to be a thorough lie. However, it is surprising that this has already thrown into history, and the lies 20 years ago have begun to resurrect in China. Huang Rieyi and Tang Jun can't wait to stand up and say: Microsoft just wants to do platform, and let all people involved in this platform will benefit from it, it is through this way, Microsoft platform can be defeated, Microsoft itself can achieve benefits Really maximization.
The most authoritative breaking this lie, of course, it should be Microsoft CEO Ballmer. He came in China to answer this time, "My answer is: Nothing We don't plan to do." At least, he is honest with the manager of these two Chinese markets. Suspected is reasonable, but we did see the fact: Recently Microsoft has indeed investing several projects: a joint venture with four-way, a joint investment in Shanghai. The introduction of these two projects is named. However, as long as you understand Microsoft's true investment, you will suddenly realize. Because the amount of each item is only 1-2 million US dollars! You can create a record of multinational companies in China's investment, of course, the lowest record. Because people who have a little more common sense know how this money may be a software company, and the two companies have to be the country's first? Therefore, it is actually not true investment, but it is a different form of public relations costs, and its news effect is lying on stone, which once again proves that Microsoft's savings and high. Intel, IBM, Motorola's investment is several hundred times, thousands of times, nor do not necessarily have such a huge effect. And in-depth understanding of the effects behind these investments, you will understand that more extraordinary things are still behind.
Microsoft China is really so poor?
Microsoft is really powerful, according to the US "Softletter" 2001 statistics, the top 100 income of the top 100 companies in the global PC software is $ 31.8 billion, of which Microsoft accounts for 69% (US $ 21.8 billion), and 99 total only 31%! Microsoft has completely completed the global monopoly of PC software. Now their ambition is monopoly two major markets: corporate application software and software service market. Because Microsoft also has $ 30 billion in market value, $ 30 billion in income, more than 90% of gross profit, 40% of net profit! And there are more than $ 35 billion in cash reserves in the bank, and nearly $ 1 billion in speeds per month. 6.2 billion yuan is just a net profit of Microsoft 3 weeks. Soft? Letter 2000 Global PC software (excluding enterprise software and software services) company income ranking
Compared with its powerful real, Microsoft plays a very innocent role in China, has been crying! This makes the sympathy and support of countless people. However, what is the actual real situation? According to the data released by the Zhongguancun Management Committee, Microsoft China's sales in 2001 were 154,9691 billion yuan, while IDC research believes that the size of China's software market is $ 162 million in 2001. Moreover, we must point out that these numbers do not include the income of Microsoft and domestic PC vendors OEM, which is said to complete transactions in overseas or Hong Kong, and do not include domestic income, and do not include foreign brands PC bundled income. At present, the sales of 10 million markets per year are based on Microsoft's news release, and the bundling of brand PCs has been more than 50%, so that Windows income in this market should also be $ 200 million. In other words, Microsoft's actual market share in China's software industry has far more than 10%, which is the largest software company in the Chinese market. Its revenue not only exceeds IBM, but at least 10 times the first independent software company - UF (2.3956.8 billion yuan), which is much more than the top 20 Chinese software companies. In general, the PC software does not account for 1/3 of the entire software industry, so Microsoft has reached more than 50% in China's PC software market! The Iceberg in the business has firmly established a monopoly position! Microsoft's market share in China has exceeded its market share in the United States.
From the moment Microsoft's personnel in China (around 1,000 people), Microsoft China has profitable, Microsoft China's cry is completely hypocritical, is the tears of crocodile!
Table: Software Enterprise Enterprise Enterprise Enterprise in Zhongguancun Science and Technology Park (Beijing area)
Test and measure the fundamental standards of Microsoft
Microsoft is a company, not the main public relations art, nor charity donation, but software products. The fundamental standard for testing a business excellence is: whether to provide consumers with a reasonable price for consumers, and whether fair competition effectively promotes industrial development. The root cause of Microsoft encounters anti-monopoly lawsuits in the United States is: Netscape, Sun, BE, IBM, AOL, Intel, Oracle, Red Hat, Coopers, Real, etc. More than 10 hardware and software companies, complain Microsoft to damage market competition with monopoly power The American Consumer Association (CFA), US Public Interest Research Group (USPIRG), etc. Comparative Microsoft uses monopoly to plunder 10 billion US dollars to unfair excess profit before 1999. And Microsoft's root causes of frustrations in China are also exactly the same: in repairing innovation, hindering competition, impairing competition, harming the development of China's software industry; using absolute monopoly status, all kinds of unreasonable high prices, unreasonable price, seeker unreasonable Excess profit. Microsoft's "Global Unified Price" fundamentally violates consumers-centered market rules, because China's living standard gap is disparied, and an intellectual property product can be created by consumers. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a practical price in accordance with different conditions. Since universal software as a product is getting more like books and audiovisual products, it is a typical zero-edge cost, facing the public's intellectual property products. At present, the international universal rules determined by the WTO are also a kind of protection of software as a literary work (software specialism is only one of the views of academic debates, and has not been recognized by international rules). A book, typical price in the United States is $ 20, 20 yuan in China, no matter which master's work; such as a movie, typical price in the United States is 20 US dollars, China is probably 20 yuan No matter what giant film. Therefore, the pricing of PC is also more reasonable in accordance with similar rules.
As the deputy director of the Foreign Trade and Economic Cooperation, I said that "in the global elimination of digital gap" said: "For example, intellectual property protection is very important, it should not be expanded, and it should be avoided to protect intellectual property protection into the people of developing countries. Get knowledge and information obstacles. For example, if a key home computer software, you should charge a $ 1200, which is an astronomical figure for consumers in many developing countries. This will hinder developing countries. Personal computers and Internet applications and popularization, and also not to improve sales performance of this software. In other words, the current practice is limited to the current development capacity of developing countries, and it also limits a potential market formation. And development. "
Therefore, gives a real action to the industry and consumers, and makes the industry to promote development; for Chinese consumers to make reasonable prices, so that they get real interests. This is the fundamental standard for measuring whether the Microsoft is hypocritical. It is also the core of Microsoft to truly reverse the unfavorable situation. Otherwise, all all are all emptiness. However, so far, all the efforts of Microsoft still avoid these core issues. The intention of this event is also very obvious: it is to find breakthroughs between different departmental interests, directly seek the government procurement certificate.
Because we all know that developing software industry, how should we first be the information of the Ministry of Information Industry, or closely related to the Ministry of Science and Technology. But this time, Microsoft has chosen to cooperate with the Planning Commission, and it seems to be wrong. However, if you understand, which department leads to government procurement rather than developing a software industry, you know that Microsoft's shooting is so accurate. Because Microsoft's fundamental purpose is also government procurement, directly into the market, rather than true for industrial development and consumer interests.
"Microsoft changed for China?" This is not a lie, is a childish dream!
China has a "Bao Director"
So do Microsoft be a qualified partner? Let us look at Microsoft's past real, with Microsoft has a close cooperation and help Microsoft's MITS, IBM, Apple and other companies have skin pain. 3COM founder Baob, who has worked with Microsoft to develop network operating systems, and more deeply, he said: "With Microsoft, it is like mating with the mother-spider black widow, it is fortunate."
Therefore, in cooperation with Microsoft, Microsoft has cultivated the Chinese software industry, which is not very different from tiger.
Of course, we have to admit that Microsoft is undoubtedly very savvy, Tang Jun is undoubtedly very smart. Originally, our government department should fully mobilize the competitive power of IBM, Sun, etc., gain the greatest interest in the game between them, but did not think of it, but Microsoft is slightly shattering, let our government departments and industry Internally lively "game", Microsoft obviously expects to be able to be able to be in confusion.
We really don't dare to expect our government departments to fight Zhi, facing the sugar-coated cannons of the Microsoft government public relations, can be "leaving the sugar-coated, sending the shells back". However, we will not believe this time, Microsoft surpass a multinational company, detonating a war in the Chinese software industry, will put on the national department of the Planning Commission, the Ministry of Information, Ministry of Science and Technology, and the central government, will have a large number of high officials And senior experts involved in contradictory vortices, really enabled from "crossing fire" across the shore. " We don't believe that this time Microsoft is too dedicated and forgotten, and the final result will really be compensated. We also don't believe that the Chinese software industry really wants to win in the leadership and guidance of "Bao Director"!
So how should we deal with? First, our strategy should be able to be independent! Our strategy should not be around Microsoft, and can not be led by "Bao Director". If we can't set the strategy of self-sovereignty, this is really sad.
Anti-law is the core issue of China Software Industry Development Strategy
The implementation of the industrial development, competitive training, technological innovation, consumer interests, etc., is competitive. Competition is the essence of the market economy! Therefore, it is possible to say that the competitive industrial pattern can be constructed to prevent the leadership of the monopoly power, and is the primary issue of the development strategy of China's software industry. This problem is solved, and other questions can be guaranteed.
The Chinese market is particulartomized. The Chinese software industry is also two legs walking: First, the strategy based on the domestic market is the export-oriented strategy. The former is similar to the United States, Japan's development model, relying on the competitiveness of independent intellectual property products; the latter is similar to India, Ireland, Israel's development model, based on software services and foundry. The two are very different, to be unified, it is impossible to rely on China's own power, and must have strategically introduced foreign industrial power. As long as we have a strategy, we can also convert the disadvantage into an advantage. Due to the seductive domestic market, we can introduce all walks of people, and establish close cooperative relations to achieve leap-forward development. In this regard, the Indian software industry will be an important force in future cooperation. However, you must be able to make your strength, you must have some competitiveness. Moreover, the Chinese software industry only has real competitiveness in the domestic market, and it can truly go out!
Due to the particularity of the software industry, once the monopoly is formed, the harm to the industry, the damage of competition, the damage of innovation, and the damage to consumers, will be very serious. And then break the monopoly, it is almost no longer possible, and the transfer cost will also be amazing! At present, China's software industry is still emerging markets, with great plasticity, and cannot pay for a long time for short-term benefits. Because it is not difficult to prevent monopoly, its core is to cultivate competitive power: First, use government procurement and reasonable rules, unswervingly support and support the development of independent software; one is to fully mobilize competitive power between multinational companies They form a fierce market competition. Ability to maintain sustained competitive pressure, the industry, for consumers, and technological innovation are the best return, and the monopolists themselves are also the best incentives and constraints. Competition: A healthy software industry must
The Chinese software industry is determined to be large and the prospect is wonderful. It can be foreseen that if the strategy is proper, the market will form three powerful competitive power after a few years: a self-independent software, a multinational company's power, and a joint venture (India may become the protagonist of India) . We don't exclude any strength, we welcome any industrial power, but the focus should support and guide the competition between them. As long as the three strengths form a healthy competition pattern, the prospect of the Chinese software industry is inevitable, and the situation of Chinese consumers must actively, and China's cost is rationally. However, if the market is single forces, even monopoly monopolizers, everything will be a nightmare. The domestic software market is currently a multinational company, in many fields, even in fact monopoly. The power of self-independent software is very weak, even in a shrinking trend. The joint venture is the emerging power that is about to rise, but the prospect is still uncertain, full of variables. The competitiveness of multinational companies is mainly from the first advantage, especially in the United States, the world's largest software market, which makes them reflect unparalleled advantages in technology, products, scale, management, funds, etc., for example, China has no software. The business scale of the company can reach 1% of IBM, nor a China Independent Software Company reaches 1% of Microsoft's scale. Even in China, their market share is also amazing, such as IBM's business in China is 10 times that of China's largest software company. Microsoft's business in China is more than 10 times more of China's largest PC software vendor.
Obviously, such a situation is impossible to achieve. The development of autonomous software must make full use of the WTO rules, relying on some special policies to provide substantive support within reasonable scope. Among them, the biggest support is government procurement! This is what we can and must be straightforward.
Preventing the industry from being dominated by monopoly, so that the industry is from the future of monopoly, and the Chinese software industry has truly "live". Other strategic objectives will become a hall. It seems that the objective Microsoft McKinsey version of "China Software Industrial Development Strategic Research Report" is just evade and masks this core problem. If we really listen, it is harmful to it! The beauty of the Chinese software industry may be disconnected!
The fortress is first broken from the interior, so it is fundamentally, we are worried about Microsoft, but our own blind and disregard. Our criticism is not Microsoft, but our own strategy lack and passive.
All follow:
