Borland's compiler is the best compiler on earth, and people who have used Borland's compiler have such an idea.
The first contact program is after college, starting late, when the impact of Microsoft, I also started to learn VC, but later, I went to understand Borland compiler. Since the course study is C language, I chose BCB. In our school, I have a few minority will use VC, I can only find a few Delphi. I found it. Many people, they all said that they have not used BCB. I feel the hardships of learning, but I have not lost confidence, because I have a very special loyalty to the BCB. I found all the relevant BCB information I can find, and I also tried to ask a simple question in the Internet. From 5.0 to the current 6.0, I am a person trying to solve all possible problems. Many friends give me Say, still use Delphi, the information is good, but I still insist, I like BCB. Some people advise me to say, use VC, have a future, I still say, I like BCB, I don't know if my idea is Yes, there is a kind of power to stick to me to continue, that is, I love BCB. It can be said that I put my own future, hand it over to BCB, that is a true BCB FANS to BCB Love.
I believe that there are still many people who talk to me, let their own destiny with BCB together. They are not to find good work, not to show off knowledge in front of others, but truly love to BCB, so since it has been I think BCBER is the cutest person. But I also believe that there are many people like me, know how difficult I learned BCB. They have to find Delphi's information to refer to, they have to use other tools to maintain Livelishes, even many times, they will be abandoned by the society: "BCB, but just put a few controls by IDE!" When I saw this, I especially want to swear. I really want to ask him. So is the STL people are idiot? In contrast, people will think that people with STL are very cow, because they know how STL is used, or some things can be modified to achieve their own purposes. Or Then why don't you use the compilation to write a program? Similarly, people who use BCB are also very great, because they not only rely on those who have a poor information to improve their own, when they find that the control is not able to meet their requirements, Also modify your control.
I like C , I also like Borland, some people say that the real programmer uses VC, smart programmers with delphi, then people with BCB are people who are really smart. Because we learn from difficult to study (C ) It is more complex and west and the flexible language, but we use it from a simple place! This is what I personally think is better to learn. I often say one of the people around me: "Learn BCB Don't watch BCB Book, but to see C book, because BCB books are limited to death! "So I often look at C and VC books. I also often look at VC code, but I rarely use vc. Now, I am Every day, I saw that there were more people with BCB, I was happy, I also felt some sad, because they were affected by my influence, but I didn't know if the roads were good. Orland is a great The company, but his attitude towards BCB has always made us bcb fans feel cold. For so long, our expectations of BCB are very big, but BCB has not changed, giving a feeling of delphi, and use pascal write VCL, let us not accept, in Delphi, we can easily see all the source code of all things, but the BCB is not, Delphi has a lot of information, but the BCB is not, the BCBX before, before, What many people have been shocked. Some people want to change the VCL with C , but someone says it is not necessary, but I think that it is necessary, especially for people who learn BCB. At present, the BCB function can say It is very powerful, whether it is a network or a database, but DCOM is still Snap, but why always make people look down? I think Borland has a large part of the reason, not that we don't want to use BCB, but Borland's own I should think about it, with Microsoft to compete? Review RAD? Although the BCB's RAD is very easy to use, but .NET is also very good. So I suggest that Borland spends more effort on the BCB, not to improve Where there are still many problems, there are still many problems.
Here, I just want to say to Borland, we like BCB, but have you really experienced the feelings of our people who learn BCB? Maybe one day, BCB is really abandoned by Borland, then we learn BCB people Who is coming with us ?? I often ask me, BCB is good? Is it reliable? I always answer them: Ok, absolutely reliable! I hope that in the mouth of Borland, I also give us a answer to the BCB. Although the above is just my idea, I think it also represents a lot of people's voice. I hope that one day, BCB can really become the most powerful programming tool for C .
Author: Guilin University of Electronic Technology, the child cold
2003 -10 28
(You can reprint, but please indicate the source)
