Program Borland in the "persecution" programmer? {by Easy Tiger} Initialization Persons Today, some people in the Monoper Forum said that they were "persecuted" for a long time, heard this statement, first shocked? Is Borland to give us the RAD IDE is not enough? Isn't it too efficient enough? Still can't keep up? Not Delphi already supported .NET development? After reading it, I would like to say that Delphi turns lazy, VCL has become an obstacle, and Delphi only "control" is not "design". . . I was very uncomfortable at the beginning, I want to go, I want to change this problem, we hope that Borland will provide us with what development tools? Rad is so madly after so many years, how much help is modern development tools and OOP languages? Borland really understands what is the current programmer now? Unit1. "Persecution" Yuan murder? It is Anders, yes, first-harm until we have to go to Microsoft's programmers for C / VB. . People are young, ten years of coming, create two sets of great weapons (Delphi and C #). . . When we can also have a "persecution" guy ... DREAM DREAM .. Not So Long a Dream. This person won't just look at this article? (*) Unit2. Be "persecution"? I did a ten-year programmer, forgive me for leaning against the old, I think, people who do not write controls will not be able to get the Delphi programmer. I don't mean that the number of people who know that the number of taps is not equal to the player development tool. . . The new person will be very surprised, have a sense of accomplishment, and feel that the development tool is very worshiped. It is even a bit superstition, but I have found the card for a while, and the development tool seems to be so magical. Have Bug, then shouting, even the older who is often boasting is often the most fierce person who is in the future, the people who don't like the big sadness, only one who is not happy, will not be sad The truth is very simple, so many developers worldwide, is this problem, is my head discovered? Is there a better solution? OK, it's great, I finally have the opportunity to contribute to the development tools I love. . . Saving the time of success (All over the world) ~~ Not Yue, the buglist in the hair email to Borland shouts what "Behind", complaining about "persecution", but found a bug, how much .Pas? 23 trillion, more than 500 files, hundreds of thousand lines of code. . . What? Have you heard of KOL? (**) The spirit of learning people will do 10 kinds of development tools I have used, but the most use of Delphi, there is nothing else, I like it, I feel that my achievements are easy to reuse and share with others. Can also share the results of others. . . It's really a pity that Anders leave. . .
Unit3. I think Borland doesn't have missed mistakes, and it is very serious, but I think it is so shallow, I just learned to go online, it is 97 years, I think about it. First rushing to Borland's website, just encounter a programmer's activities to develop Borland's activities, roughly hope to support the development of 32-bit protection models, 进 进 去 ~~ A total of thousands of collected A request, the result is very disappointed, Borland refuses, the reason is Windows95, Delphi has also been out, DOS wants to enter the garbage, resulting in countless programmers to turn to the embarrassing Watcomc ... (although Tmt Pascal / Free Pascal) ~ Night), I feel a bit unbelievable to Borland since then. I think the Borland development tool is a bit structure uniform. Now it can only be more obvious: there are many very fine of the upper work, especially with Delphi IDE / VCL as a representative, and the aspect can be said that the ultimate, TFORM's attribute is increasing The more, the empty propject1 is 350K. Excessive too thin IDE / VCL has a burden on the port of Delphi (it is said to develop Kylix, the compiler development is only very short, the IDE is very long .. Stealing, Ide / VCl is the essence of RAD, but is the power of Object Pascal to rely on them? Is it difficult to transplant the Object Pascal compiler? In fact, every student of "Compilation Principle" has been learned, almost all Class Pascal compiler, may not do Object syntax, but this is definitely a small dish in Borland. . . The relationship between the upper layer technology and the compilation technology is like multiplication M * n, when the m is large, N can make the result to increase rapidly, and the pursuit of M change is very difficult (Delphi 7 How many new odds can be brought by RAD IDE?). Unit4. Delphi "Black" ... DURING The "Meet The delphi Team" The Question of Wince Was BROUGHT UP. BEN Riga asked for a show of Hands of Those Present ABoout Interest in Seeking Delphi for Wince. Almost Every Hand Went Up. I Think The (Inprise) WERE SUPRISED. (***) The famous Delphi Electronic Magazine UNDU is on such a small story: 大意: ... In the "meeting" with Delphi Team "activity, questions about WinCe Mentioned. Ben Riga requires representatives that are interested in Delphi for Wince topics. Almost all hands play, I think they (inprise / borland) were surprised.
... Why do you want RAD, maybe there is a better solution than VCL? Object Pascal's compiler performance / efficiency, although no C / C , we see the C / C language horizontal world, but the Object Pascal underlying compiler is single, limited to the X86 platform, causing the C to go all over the world, The people who learn Pascal graduated, but the investment in Pascal Borland's input is not much less, from each Delphi / CBuilder version upgrade, it can be seen that Borland is prioritizing Object Pascal, but long-term excessive concentrated on the upper layer Buildings, RAD is getting more and more, it is increasingly large. . . At this time, if there is a lot of innovations on the compiler, you will learn more about Borland's experience. Each Object Pascal compiler on a variety of platforms should be more than others now Pocket PC so fire, but each CPU manufacturer follows Microsoft. Wooden ~~ If Borland can adjust the strategy, it will be a very favorable business position. . . Even HP-Compaq iPAQ (Pocket PC's largest partner) is subject to Microsoft feel very uncomfortable, desperately, set up a foundation to develop Pocket Linux (****), I am afraid that Microsoft flips face ... and a large group Delphi programmers can only wait and see next, and a large number of control groups can only be developed in one platform. Although there is now Kylix, but still did not take off X86, my hope is that Borland is completely refined to another revolution, not to be optimized in X86 instructions, in fact, in fact, there are more CPUs, this work is also Datong is small, and it is half-time. Unit5. Say DO NOT to DOT NET? I mean is not to refuse .Net, but only is not enough to be parasitic, just like I didn't look good, now: I always feel that it is itchy ~~~~ and I can't help it. In boots. . . In fact, cross-platform issues have been exaggerated, don't pursue the world! Why people have witnessed the existing cross-platform techniques, C code is, TCP / IP is also, of course, if the Object Pascal is better. Only the original execution code is perfect! I said that some people may not be convinced ~~ So Microsoft is the most powerful, it encourages the software staff to write .NET applications, and native code parts, but also combine multiple CPU hardware combine compilation and code optimization. Working to yourself, tired on the surface, but it has achieved the best commercial status (in this regard, there are many technologically reusable resources and talent reserves), which is software and hardware technology combination, equal to Microsoft to catch it. The two major roots (operating systems and compilers) of the IT industry, while Microsoft is in a concealed irreplaceable position, natural interests are not prone. In the end, hardware manufacturers and other software vendors are finally competitive, and any application software vendors even can't shake Microsoft. One computer pays Microsoft's $ 20 OEM costs, but if each computer, each mobile phone, every smart home appliance. It is paid to Microsoft 20 US dollars, how is a number. . . (Even each shop terminal, every means of transportation, every toilet ... Microsoft is not in :)) The more the topic is, the more it is, and it is back. . . The operating system is difficult to make Microsoft, but the compiler technology is definitely possible.
