Organization: China Interactive Publishing Network (http://www.china-pub.com/)
RFC Document Chinese Translation Program (http://www.china-pub.com/compters/emook/aboutemook.htm)
E-mail: Ouyang@china-pub.com
Translator: Anpengwang Anpengwang@263.net)
Translation time: 2001-4-26
Copyright: This Chinese translation copyright belongs to China Interactive Publishing Network. Can be used for non-commercial use free reprint, but must
Keep the translation and copyright information of this document.
NetWork Working October 17, 1969
RFC-21 UCLA
V. CERF
online meeting
(RFC 21 Network Working)
On October 10 (1969), a web conference was held at the University of California, and participants have:
Scientific Data Center (SDC)
John Kreznar Dick LINDE MARTY BLEIER BOB Long
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)
Vint Cerf Steve Crocker Jon Postel Michel Elie
California University Barbara Branch (UCSB)
Ron STOUGHTON NANCY O'HARA George Gregg
Discussion topic:
1. Revision BBN Memo 1822
2. Revision NWG / RFC 11
3. Transmission of multiple control messages
1. Revision BBN Memo NO. 1822 (emphasized) - Informal Notice by Dave WA
Page 11 "Imp programs can handle up to 63 active transmission connections and 63 event reception connections. Such as
There is already a transmission connection of 63 activities, and when the host attempts to send a message through a new connection, IMP will go to the main
The machine issued a message of 'connection form full', and the message to send was abandoned. "
Page 11 "1. If the connection is not used in 26 seconds, the IMP program will automatically delete the item."
[CERF: How is it only deleted when sending a connection form?
CROCKER: No, because there is no other way to delete the connection, they will continue to accumulate. Moreover, possible a site
The form is full and the other site may not be full.
Page 13 "Abandoned 5 Rules"
Since the top of the Imp-Host queue reaching the target host IMP will be abandoned, this will cause the IMP system to
The amount of traffic does not actually reach any host. Network Monitoring Center (NetWork Measurement Center)
This feature can be used.
Page 13 no longer allocates message type 6, the message type 10 is actually an octal and actually the type 8.
Non-assigned type 9-15.
Page 17 Type 10 is actually type 8.
2. Revision NWG / RFC 11
The memorandum has been abolished after discussion of UCLA development and other nodes. NWG / RFC 22 contains some
Important changes. The updated version of NWG / RFC 11 will be released soon.
3. George Gregg from UCSB will release NWG / RFC 23, content is about
Transport multiple control messages on the control connection.
RFC 21 Network Meeting Network Conference
RFC Document Translation Plan
