RFC10 document specification

zhaozj2021-02-16  46

Organization: China Interactive Publishing Network (http://www.china-pub.com/)

RFC Document Chinese Translation Program (http://www.china-pub.com/compters/emook/aboutemook.htm)

E-mail: Ouyang@china-pub.com

Translator: McSewang Mcsewang@21cn.com)

Translation time: 2001-6-10

Copyright: This Chinese translation copyright belongs to China Interactive Publishing Network. Can be used for non-commercial use free reprint, but must

Keep the translation and copyright information of this document.

Network Working Group S. CROCKER

RFC-10

UCLA

21 July 1969

Documentation specification

(RFC10 - Documentation Conventions)

This specification is a revision of NWG / RFC # 3.

Network Working Group includes Steve Carr from Yuguzhou, Sri's Elmer

Shapiro and Bill English, UCLA Steve Crocker, Rand John Haefner, Lincoln Laboratory

Paul Rovner and Jim Curry are not limited.

Network Working Group: NWG, pay attention to host software, network usage strategy and network

Initial experience in use.

The NWG work document is recorded in a record similar to this article. This document can be sent by anyone in any site

The cloth is included in this series.

content

The NWG file record can be any idea, suggestions, etc. related to other features of the host software or network.

The document does not have to be beautiful, but the contents of the content should be assured as much as possible. Documentation of the following contents can also,

Such as: pure position opinion, without any instance and other details; propose special advice or execution skills

There is no relevant background interpretation; just understand a question and not give any answers. A document request

Not less than one sentence.

These standards are based on the following two reasons: first, people tend to record file records as in fact rights

Wei, we want to promote communication and discussions rather than listening to the authority. Second, people usually do not want to publish some unidentified

True crafted articles, we want to eliminate this concern.

format

Each NWG document should include the following information:

1. "NetWork Working Group"

"Request for Comnments: X" (X Underline)

Where x is a serial number, it gives a Steve Crocker of UCLA.

2. Author and partner

3. Date

4. Topic

The title is not required

release

A copy of the note is sent by the author's site to the following members:

Steve Crocker, UCLA

2. Ron STOUGHTON, UCSB

3. Elmer Shapiro, SRI

4. Steve Carr, UTAH

5. John Haefner, Rand

6. Paul Rovner, LL

7. Bob Kahn, BB & N

8. Larry Roberts, ARPA

9. Jerry Cole, SDC

If necessary, the copy can be processed locally.

address

The following is the latest address, if necessary, please correct:

Steve crocker ucla

3732 Boelter Hall (213) 825-4864

UCLA 825-2543 Sec'ylos Angeles, California 90024

Ron STOUGHTON UCSB

Computer study lab. (805) 961-3221

UCSB

Santa Barbara, California 93106

Elmer Shapiro Sri

Stanford Research Institute (415 )326-6200

333 ravenswood

Menlo Park, California 94025

Steve Carr Utah

Computer science de PEPT. (801) 322-8224

University of Utah

Salt Lake City, UTAH 84LL2

John haefner rand

The Rand Corp. (213) 393-0411

1700 main street

Santa Monica, California 90406

Paul D. Rovner LL

Mass. Inst. Of tech. (617) 662-5500

Lincoln Laboratory B-115 x7211

P.O. Box 73

Lexington, mass. 02173

Robert Kahn BBN

Bolt, BERANEK AND NEWMAN (617) 491-1850

50 Moulton St. 49L-1868

Cambridge, mass. 02138

Larry Roberts ARPA

ODS / ARPA (202) OX 7-8663

3D167 Pentagon OX 7-8654

Washington, D.c. 2030L

Jerry Cole SDC

7842 Croyden 2500 Colorado

L.a., California 90045 Santa Monica, California 90406

(213) 393-9411

X438

X6019 SEC'Y

RFC10 Documentation Conventions document specification

1

RFC Document Chinese Translation Program

转载请注明原文地址:https://www.9cbs.com/read-27261.html

New Post(0)