D version brings us
This is an old topic, and the coexistence of different views in society has brought a lot of arguments. I am talking about this question here is not to fight with a certain person, but I want to use my feelings. Objective explanation: The D version has brought us anything.
The D version is objective, its madness is inseparable from its historical background, and the same is the same as other things. Objectively saying that the D version has a good side in China, and there is a bad side. (Note: The benefits of discussing the D version will never encourage the use of the D version, just objective evaluation).
To be honest, there is a lot of developing countries such as China that can really use the computer. The reason is not because you can't afford hardware, but because you can't afford software. Then, my country's computer penetration rate has risen, although the procurement of the government and the company accounts for a part, but it has a large part of it is still "benefited from" D version. At present, the development of computer basic education is also inseparable from D version. In terms of ordinary colleges, college students are using a computer, learn to learn, and have a total of ninety five% of the software in the campus. This is enough to explain it in the way to the students. An important role. Imagine that if there is no D version, the class' s computer level will not have the current extent. Now there is the following facts that you can use Windows, you can't afford to go to the school's computer room, and the poor delivery time will directly lead to a consequence, that is, people who operate computer, at least more than now One third (then, the school's Windows also part is D version). "Text Processing" can be done frequently, but I don't think many students can use MS Office, even if WPS Office has to think twice. There is also a problem, that is, how is the school that the school is "not allowed to play games"? Do not play games? How many students have a program on their machine? You must know that a set of Visual C is enough for three-year tuition, and the game software is still relatively cheap.
Yes, after I have a D version, the above problems are all solved. Everyone's computer level is improved, and the course design can be completed ... this is the positive impact of the D version brings us.
What is not arguing it is, we can't recognize that the development of the computer's poor is the credit of the D version. Moreover, using the D version, it has brought a lot of convenience to our learning work, meeting the interests of our eyes.
But human beings can't only take care of the interests of the eyes. You know, using the D version also brings huge hidden dangers, but it is fatal. Imagine if everyone uses the D version, the software company will have no funds to develop new software, and the existing version will not be updated. In the end, the company has closed closes, and the entire IT industry will fall into the embarrassment, so the result is unimaginable. So, in order to use a computer in the future, the computer industry continues to develop forward, we must take the sustainable development path - publicize the use of genuine, resolutely crack down on the D version.
The D version is the product of the times. It is necessary to destroy it. It is still a long period of time. It is impossible to completely eliminate in the near future. It is impossible to rely on one or two people. However, I firmly believe that with the increase in people's living standards and the continuous increase in property rights, there is always a day D version will not becomes uncomfortable. Let us join hands and give us a blue sky.
