I am afraid that many people have found that if only one computer is bought, there is no practical software, then the computer cannot produce satisfactory "so big" role. The subtext of this phenomenon is: Application is king. This foregoing has been elaborated. And these four strokes are simple, and the words that are easy to understand means the price, and it is a lot of money. In developed countries, in the overall cost of computers (TCO), hardware accounts for only 40%, while software and services account for a big head, regardless of business calculation or personal PC. Wow? ! Don't be too scary: I spent 9,000 pieces bought a computer, and I have to spend 10,000 to play its role, which is just robbery! People who have this idea are definitely not a few. The author believes that the reason why PC manufacturers have to bear most of their responsibilities. I have been thinking that they have deeply know this truth from the first PC, but they are secretly declared, but they have reached the price of the computer, and the computer has entered the usual people's home. They are unrestricted confused public relations public relations, making the people as "I added a computer, 9 thousand, one step". I think this misunderstanding is the direct consequence of PC manufacturers. What is the correct concept? I bought a computer, hardware 6000, software 2500, on training class 500, a total of 9000; enough to use it, you can play a huge role for my work and learning; estimated 3 years later, I am going to give this computer Parents, add one of them; in these three years, the value brought to me will be far more than 9,000; this matter does it!
