At noon, the sun shines through the thin clouds, filters the burning temperature, quietly falling on my skin. I don't know why, I remembered the film "Shawshank's Redemption", the old black prisoner, the old black prisoner, played by Morgan Freemo. Red was sentenced to life imprisonment due to murder, and was held in the Shawshank prison, and after nearly half of the century, it had already been approved by the parole application. The film is close to the end, and he sits in front of the young parole reviewer, facing the procedural questions: Do you think you can re-do people (RHABILITATED)? After a vicissitudes of red, quietly looking at the opposite young man, saying: I don't have regretted a day, the stupid boy committed a terrible crime. I said this, not because I am in prison now, not to please you. Looking back, I want to say something about the stupid young man, tell him what I have now, tell him that there can be other way to solve the problem. However, I can't do it. The young man has already disappeared in the long river of the years, leaving only an old man here, facing the past. Reem for people? But it is a deception. The first time I saw this place, it is an intention of suppressing. The protagonist in the film is Tim Robins played. He was originally a branch of a career. Soon after he found that his wife and her lover were killed, so he was accused of murder. It is sentenced to life imprisonment. He spent 20 years in prison and finally successfully escaped. No matter whether there is a red, it is still being sentenced to death. I think this kind of penalty has embodied at least a kind of care and tolerance for life. Perhaps, this will feel a bit unbearable in many Chinese eyes. If this is not a movie, we don't know about these murderers, most of us may feel that they are dead. Why did the Red and the misunderstandings have not been sentenced to death, and we have frequently used the death penalty when technical means and legal procedures are not perfect. There is no death penalty without implementing death penalty. However, even if it is a country or place that permits the death penalty, the approval of the death penalty is also cautious. This involves different values of the Chinese and Western society to life. Western culture is affected by Christianity. They think that every life is given, anyone has no right to deprive a person's life, no matter what he did. This is a ridiculous, "feudal superstition". A thousand years of Chinese society is a social, and the human life is a habit. The life of the flat head is like a mustard, just like the "grass people" in the face of the power, let alone people who have been guilty. In a society that emphasizes collectivism, in order to collectively, the individual bleeding does not matter, killing does not matter. Those who violate the laws and moral principles, those who are opposite to our principles should die, they are not dead. The abuse of the death penalty, let us feel the lack of a tolerant spirit; "tolerance" abuse abused the death penalty, it makes people feel the blood of kill. Recently, the death penalty found in frequent frequently misjudes, can't imagine how much death row is to be misjudiced by the provision of the criminal. Just, they and their loved ones will always be nailed on the shame column, and there will never be the possibility of opening Shen. I have never been to abroad, just quietly here. But seeing and heard more and more things, let me get involved in the maturity of most Chinese, doubting their tolerance.
A few days ago, in the Internet, inadvertently, I saw comments on Yang Zhenning and Weng Fan: It is still full of vicious languages, mixed with shameless insults. I don't understand, one is the old man, a woman who is just a weak, just because their behavior is slightly different from the usual behavior standard of society, so it is not to be allowed to be our society. Of course, the netizens whispered netizens are only part of our people, but their remarks reflect the non-tolerance of the whole society. Self-friendly: You are really tolerance, or just because you don't do it with you? At noon before yesterday, at home, I saw a news that played TV: The court is in a middle-aged woman who is pronounced, and it is dyed, still engaged in "leather" business. In the TV, she cries. The heart began to feel blocked: Why do you want to play her image so clearly? The old girl is in the side, I don't think about it: She has this kind of thing, what is the face? I don't want to say anything, explanation is often useless. Yes, she is a criminal, but first she is a woman, a disadvantaged group belonging to society, belonging to a group that should be protected by a whole society. Maybe, she is still a mother. Perhaps, this is our thinking style: a person who has made mistakes and committing sin, there is no dignity personality. However, our society is always in the slogan, let the innocent children mistakenly think that there is how civilized and healthy progress in our society. This battle, the whole society is resistant to Japan. If you don't say it, you will not say it. I want to say something, and finally I will hold back. Some people have said a little different views, and they will follow the post: he hates those who have thought of high thinking. Yes, each of us is equal, but due to experience and other reasons, everyone's understanding is still different. As long as you think: a person who is as mentally and sound like you will have a different opinions with you, he must have his own reasons, maybe people who have problems are you. Just, I often feel that paranoid stubborn and self-righteousness is. Perhaps this is related to our social atmosphere: the environment we survive is a society that lacks tolerance to the absence of opinions. Some people are screaming: don't be angry in front of your computer, you have to do anger on action. Maybe he is not very clear: "Angry" is often used to describe blind paranoid, lack of rationality, and narrow extreme nationalism, the part of the patriotic youth who is not thinking in depth. Japan wants to be a permanent member, I also feel absurd: Japan is still an immature country. Just like a child doing things, selfishness, paranoid still has no longer grow up, I want to be a class in the class, I want to know that his classmates will certainly not agree. Just, I think we should not blindly paranoid as it. Japan did not reflect on Germany, there are many reasons. Simply put, from the outside of its outside: After the end of the World War, Lao Meishi has maintained the status and authority of the Emperor for its political interests, and there is no complete liquidation of Japanese militarism. Under such a premise, Japan is not possible to seriously reflect, because the reflection once in-depth, not only will touch the authority of the emperor, but will also touch the personality of the murder when he is a thousand people. This is also very common in our daily life: a person who has made mistakes, but there is no punishment of punishment, often looking for various excuses for himself, because he still survives in this society, he still wants In accordance with the order of society, he must prove that his legitimacy, in line with the moral legal standards of society, prove its behavior in compliance with a human standard, because he also faces the society including its children. people.
From its interior, it is the historical education of the Japanese to future generations. Many historical understandings of ordinary Japanese now, not born. After all, from the end of World War, it has been a few generations of people, and the history they know is just the history of books. They are like us, but they are in another pond, born, and grow. In their pond, they have also been infused with the value concept of some social strong groups. Just like many people around us, turn closes "our party", he or she thought that these concepts were natural, and it was the correctness of the sky, which is not suspected. In fact, it is almost infused. In the external cause and the internal factor, the end is the continuation of the external cause: because the history of the crime is not completely cleared, those criminals have also been defeated in the society, which can use their own words and deeds to influence public opinion, affect generations. A generation of Japanese. Japan is immature today, there is a historical reason. Just, I saw the surrounding days and rushed every day. I saw the big friends around him. When the children tied to the "small Japan", they saw the feelings of the teeth, seeing their feelings, regardless of the blue soap, as long as they see and we hold different perspectives The human commentary, that is, when you want to die, you always feel uncomfortable. This is not a mentality of mature society, regardless of how others are different, but first, we have to admit that they are also the same as us. What we need is to do something in fact, let them know the facts as much as possible. If they are unacceptable, they don't change, they are still as equality as us. Just like an immature child, he still has a human right. As a person, I can tolerate immature, ignore, after all, we are all walk from a toddler child to today. But as a mature society, it should not be like this. Tolerant heart, I think it should be a heart of love. The day before yesterday, the car came back. When I passed a county town, a car opened, I didn't know how to do it. I passed the bus with the bus I sat: the left front of the car was cracked, the bus of the bus was also torn open Start up. I am sitting in the window of the window, seeing clearly. At that moment, I found that people outside the car, after the short-lived horror, the mouth is unconsciously exposed. The people in the car are very excited, and the people of the road also began to smile and gathered, and the atmosphere is active, as if the festival, in addition to the driver and his ticket sales. I know, that is the gloating of the Chinese who have long been here. Why are they happy? Because the suffering is not in them, because they call the so-called benevolent and good times, only with their own interests. Sometimes I think that Chinese should receive modern Western economics than Western, because it is comparable to comparison. Most Chinese I have ever seen, their happiness will often be generated by unfortunate others. Confucius said: Don't do it yourself. In fact, he wants to explain that a person should have a tolerant heart, a tolerant attitude. From this sentence, we can launch: you want, don't do it. However, our society has long been used to a sound, a standard, only listening to understanding. Mencius said: Old, old, old, young and young. Said very well, but he is just pushing himself: If you don't have "young", then you don't need "young" "young"? He emphasized or his own experience. Thinking of Hemingway's sentence has been rotten: Broad is the ocean than the earth, the sky is broad, the sky is broad, and it is a human mind than the sky.
