Recently, some of the person in charge of some game companies must have a little annoying, and their own games have a vulnerability, and they have been used to brush a lot of virtual currency. Although the technical department quickly repaired, the related players involved in the incident have been frozen account processing, but the end of the ending and comforting work is still dispute, and even players have a face to the company to represent protests.
Those players who are directly involved in the money: "If the law has a vulnerability, the state will only be improved by revising the legal provisions, and will not punish the people who have already drilled the hole to escape the punishment. As a game developer, your product has a vulnerability, naturally Start the anti-cheating mechanism, what is the reason for depriving my game rights? "
Other players who participated in the fake virtual currency turnover in the case of unknowingly corruption: "Use a counternote will be confiscated by the bank, and the bank provides consumers to identify the truthful fake banknotes. Can you? Since there is no company you can't distinguish in a account which is brush, which is the system normally generated, how do ordinary players judge? The '错 错 案 的 错案 的 政 政 政 政 政, 政,',? "
Manufacturers are also a bitter water: "The game is developed by itself, and you can't push your responsibility to others. Even the operating system like Microsoft's strong company is also frequently attacked, let alone We are limited Game program? Do not seal the account, I will contribute to cheating, help the abuse of the abuse; I seal the account saying that I am black and white, hurt the player's heart. I am really 'pig eight rings mirror - I am not a human "!"
This seems that it seems that the online game legislation seems to be slow, and think about it, it is difficult to think about it. If the value of the virtual property and the player's ownership of the virtual property created by the game, the manufacturer's "final interpretation right is owned by the company", the user's instructions have become a genuine overlord clause, maybe spend more design games. It is also a few times more energy to develop prevention procedures for preventing cheating and plug-in protection, as well as the record procedures for identifying all game items and destination. The large-scale virtual item cash transactions in black market will also come out of the water, and the gap between online games and reality is wid away. If you continue to ignore the increasingly prominent consumer and service providers due to the contradictions of their respective positions, the vulnerability will always exist, using the vulnerability to meet the dedication of the dedication, and will always provoke a complaint. The final result may not only only a few people call friends from the message board of the China Consumer Association website, or to go to the game company's customer service center to keep a unified caliber, answer all the questions. Just use the same sentence The customer service staff complained.
Through the text, the moon suddenly remembered a reader who received on March 15 to believe. That passed the purchase of some cards in the game, and then replaced it in the game with a virtual currency. The online game player was completely blocked by the reason why the account was completely blocked. He quoted a large number of legal provisions to prove that our innocent and game operators were shameless, strongly requested that the media came back to himself back to their own game characters and virtual equipment. Regarding how to maintain the fairness of the game and the player's rights, it is like a silver coin that thrives the sky and cannot land.
