1, X800 and 6800 comparison parameters: hot performance and frozen price? The X800 graphics card with double 256 specification becomes the protagonist of ATI April. The Radeon X800 uses the R430 graphic core of the TSMC 0.11 micron process. It is also the first high-end product priced below 2,000 yuan. The Radeon X800 has 12 pixel pipelines and 6 vertex coloring units, with a core frequency of 400MHz, with 256M 256bit GDDR3 memory, and the memory frequency is set to 900MHz. The Radeon X800 also provides two interface modes of PCI-Express and AGP. The X800's opponent will be NVIDIA's 6800 series.
(256M 6800 Standard Edition) NVIDIA's GeForce 6800 Standard Edition seems to be embarrassed, except for the unique support SM3.0, 6800 Standard Edition does not dominate whether the frequency, memory specifications and prices are from the protagonist X800 of Ice Fire. Try to have the same number of rendering pipelines, but the core frequency of X800 is 400MHz, and the 6800 standard version is only 325MHz. ATI uses GDDR3 to armed X800, and try to promote 256M 256Bit advantage, the 6800 standard version is just a slower GDDR1 memory, and the memory capacity is only the mainstream 128m. The Radeon X800, NVIDIA, and Partners of ATI seem to be prepared, and 256M 256BIT's 6800 standard version is dealt, and it is urgent to fight.
Performance summary:
The X800 and 6800 256M are extremely strong, but if not on the AA and AF, the X800 is obviously ran fast with the high clock frequency. 6800 128M respects the ends in multiple tests, but the backwardness is small. From the real game feel, the three graphics cards can basically get a smooth game FPS at 1280x1024 4xaa 16xAF.
Guide analysis:
The NV40 graphic chip cost is high. According to the NVIDIA AIC discloses 256M version of the 6800 standard version cost at least $ 300. At present, there are only 6800 256m listed in China, and the offer of Winfast A400 TDH 256M is also as high as 2,800 yuan. The ATI and Partners jointly pushed the Icefire God Corners -X800 public price only 1999, and the gap between the two actually had 800 yuan, apparent that the X800 occupied absolute advantage.
(The comprehensive strength is strong! 1999 yuan X800 is the most cost-effective high-end product)
Feel the pressure of the X800 Legion, many manufacturers' 6800 standard version has killed to 1999, just right and the X800 is flat. High frequency setting, X800 performance is higher than 6800 standard version 128m, 256m 256bit high-end configuration also makes the X800 more feet in the opening of AA and AF. We recommend that if it is not a fanatical Doom3 player, we choose a more rational X800 256M in the average strength.
PS: It turned out to be NVIDIA's Fans, now. . . . . . . . .
Excerpted from: http://www.pconline.com.cn/diy/evalue/evalue/graphics/0504/601821_7.html
2, when we also selection on the LCD product of 8ms and 12MS response time, the product of the 4MS response time has entered the Pacific Evaluation Office. This world's fastest LCD response time record is refreshed by well-known display manufacturers. PS: Plus-Power ~ Excerpt from: http://www.pconline.com.cn/diy/evalue/producture/display/0504/601722.html
3, and then the K9 that will be introduced will give the user a surprise, which integrates four processor cores. Products corresponding to K9 are Whitefield, Woodcrest, and Conroe processors for desktops, respectively. According to reports, the performance of the K9 processor is very strong, the performance of Xeon DP 3.8GHz, which is the same, is only half of the frequency of 3GHz K9 processor. In addition, there is news that the future AMD will also follow Intel, large frequency band, and introduce high frequencies processors. PS: It seems that Intel is depressed, hehe. Excerpted from: http://www.pconline.com.cn/diy/front/news/cpu/0504/601779.html
4. In the test of the actual performance of the game, we found that both dual core P4D 820 is still the current P4E 2.8G, both have become a bottleneck played by GeForce 6800ULTRA. The P4E 3.6G of the evaluation room is a project version that does not lock the multiplier. We just change its multiplier to 16X, and the simulated P4E 3.2e performance is excellent in the I925x platform, all over the game test, two sets of 2.8g Platform. For the crazy game players of "On World Operation", a higher frequency P4E or Athlon 64 processor will be more practical for games (excluding other applications). Dual-core platforms are mainstream games based on the current single task, there is nothing to use. Of course, if the future games make special optimizations for dual-core, or other complex operations often need to perform other complex operations during the game, then dual-core platforms are a good choice.
PS: From the test data, in addition to the extreme multitasking can double the dual-core higher, other tests cannot be 20%.
Excerpted from: http://www.pconline.com.cn/diy/evalue/evalue/cpu/0504/600801_10.html
5, Intel's first dual-core processor code is Pentium Extreme Edition 840, the clock frequency is 3.2GHz, which is lower than the current speed of Pentium 4, supports 800MHz system bus frequencies, each core has 1MB The second-level cache uses a 90nm process process, supports LGA775 interface architecture, core voltage 1.25-1.388V, but its power consumption is up to 130 watts.
PS: My family already has a wok. . . . . . .
Excerpted from: http://www.pconline.com.cn/diy/front/news/cpu/0504/601775.html
6, AMD: Socket 1207 will become the final unified interface
PS: I don't know.
Excerpted from: http://www.pconline.com.cn/diy/front/news/cpu/0504/601413.html
