It has always been very interested in UML and use case drive development, but in practice, many confuses have been encountered, such as how to extract the use case, how to confirm the system range, how to clarify the relationship between the problem and the solutions. One " "Programmer" to see the article written by Pan Jiayu, the analysis of such problems, the well, the exemplification of the evidence, can't help but sigh: this is what I want! Trust and admire to Think (Pan Ju) also have been born - he even became my struggle. Not long ago, at the Jacobson's technical round table, I was fortunate as a viewer, I saw a lot of cattle: transparent, money, Guo Wei, etc., including Think, I would like to ask for one or two, unfortunately he I have been surrounded by ^ _ ^, there is no chance. But there is a happiness, I am very happy to be a news that Umlchina to carry out the "non-profit open class" in Beijing, the speaker is thinking. And the 2-day training fee is only 400 yuan, let me wait for someone who sang the bag. Nothing to say, quickly sign up. It turns out that Think name is not intriguing - 2 days, I have benefited a lot, and many other students have the same feeling, and I have such an opportunity. In fact, the teaching skills of Think are not high (I have participated in the training of trainers, the high hand is low, hehe), but he has a thorough understanding of theory, plus rich practical experience, and supplemented well-designed textbooks, so that I will drink Alcohol, intoxicated. However, the course just said for a long time, I will realize that if I don't make a review, practice, I am afraid that the harvest is limited, just like the little fish eaten the sinister medicine, but do not do the practice of cultivation. Therefore, the class is over, I will not overlap the LP adults, and the soft grinding hard bubbles finally got any comment :) However, I just opened a saying, I found that I still didn't learn well, the overall case There is no grasp, so that the LP protests I waste her time. Painful thinking, decision is still reviewed first, write writing notes, and then continue "destroying people" tireless. . .