Thoughts on academic norms

xiaoxiao2021-03-05  31

Two years ago, Professor Yang Zhenning issued a scholarship in Nanda. At that time, I was so annoying that when was the Chinese who would get the Nobel Prize in the Chinese, I remember that Mr. Yang Lao presents such a point of view, and China's scholars are currently the second, three generations (introducing Chinese gauges in Western China, for example, Yang Zhenning The father is a generation of mathematics), but form an academic tradition, at least three or four generations. At that time, China will have a lot of logic, such as mathematics.

It is finally able to understand this sentence, it is not enough to do this. Because cultural needs inheritance, research needs to accumulate. Therefore, it is possible to establish a healthy academic norm to form an orderly fair academic environment. It is the key to the relationship with the intensity, inheritance and development of scientific and technological culture.

For thousands of years, China has been influenced by Confucianism. And the Confucianism is honored, so the status of teachers in society has been high. However, why have academic corruption incidents have emerged in recent years?

I have always been a sexual person. Academic corruption may not be a moment of product. According to my poor historical knowledge, academic corruption, I have not stopped since I have a self-discipline. The lack of effective regulatory and reviews for teachers. China is coming to an altructure, and academic authority is often able to affect a discipline. This type of impact has a precedent, you can look at the biochemistry of the former Soviet Union. In accordance with my country's higher education system in accordance with the Soviet system, there are also such drawbacks. Everyone is here to fight for the gathering of the academician title? title? honor? Gold word sign? Just to get a lifelong authority. Have you heard that the academician has a comment and exit mechanism? Is the development speed often beyond people's imagination?

The existing review mechanism is clearly the number of orientations. Don't say anything else, graduates, a few papers. Dr., a few. Like the cabbage. It is when it is reflecting mechanism, not when it is reflective. Let's take a look, from undergraduate graduation design, to Master Education. The form is already the secret that is not announced, and it does not consider what kind of way to use to change the status quo. I think if a person he can do his favorite direction, he can do the direction he can do, he will not first consider unregulated behavior. Social competition is so fierce, and undergraduate research capacity is limited, you call him no low level to repeat, do you go? A doctorating matter, dozens of thousands of words, word étometry? On the other hand, the quantity of the paper is also an indicator. The teacher is exhausted. Dean of the Graduate Academic Crafts, five years did not have a papers, last year came out. The results cause a sense of sensation. Imagine that schools can have several teachers to stand the pressure of the paper in five years?

Therefore, there is a result. There is no driving force, no one goes to steal the cock to catch the dog.

Chinese people have always been eager to seek. It is impossible to say that it is short, probably induced into impetuous. And this kind of kindness makes the mechanism university. Furthermore, the speculator is organically multiplied. Academic corruption has been breed.

I want to be imperative, not from morality to formulate specifications. Instead, it is clear from the system to establish a premise and foundation of academic traditions.

转载请注明原文地址:https://www.9cbs.com/read-35956.html

New Post(0)