The value and application of Linux are severely exaggerated. Just like "survey: Linux is the same as the topic of WinXP" in the desktop market. Windows has achieved such achievements and has always had its advantages. Its ease of use, application, long-term user group. There are many articles about Linux and Windows comparison analysis, I have no ability to fully elaborate, please linux fans look at it.
In addition, Linux respects the facts. What is computer technology to do? Everyone wants to think, it is used to help others work, learn, and entertainment. So how will ordinary people choose OS? Remember, it is ordinary person. I think humanity has a big psychology: from the heart! ? I think it is basically such a choice order: more people, more functions (it is what we said), simple (it is best to use it with yourself), beautiful (those who say that the interface is not important, I would like to ask Ask the psychology of ordinary users, they don't like the beautiful OS), stabilize and safe (now the hottest topic). If I am in this imaginary, everyone should be easy to determine why Windows can firmly grasp the desktop app. Linux can make unmisting achievements in the server field, but look at the desktop? Objective analysis, did he have such conditions?
Possible Linux fans shirk to users to promote desktop applications, accusing users to treat Linux, not accessible, not open, do not give Linux opportunities. But you think that the user has the right to choose his own os, which is afraid of because a reason why you seem to be aim: it is familiar; others are also used. Software promotion, do you need to use others?
In fact, it is difficult to promote a new operating system. What is Linux facing? Windows will also be hindered. I have been in contact with the computer. I have experienced a lot of replacement in OS: 1.DOS 3.30-> DOS 5.0 2.PC DOS-> MS DOS (I don't know if there is anyone remember Dr Dos) 3.Dos-> Windows 3.14.win3.1-> 95; NetWare -> Winnt; 5.win95-> win20006.win2000-> WinXP. Among them, there are the most famous WINDOWS and OS / 2 wars. Please take a look at the history, WIN's success is not to hinder your next generation software promotion? At the promotion of WinXP, my company has received a small resistance. Now there are companies to continue to use Win95, many companies have continued to use Win2000, do you know? The same room is still in the same room, a lot of things use Win2000 users, simply do not want to upgrade to WinXP, even use XP users, and do not easily upgrade the system to SP2 free. Why is that? In such a situation, let alone Linux that is poor than Windows yourself. Even if Linux is better than XP, Is XP not better than Win2000? Why is OS / 2? Log in technology? Is lost in the background boss? Load no application? History is replayed, deciding what software is popular is not our technical personnel, not a company, not open source or not open source, the key is the user.
Is your thing what you want is what users want? Can users accept it? Does users like it?
Why do you accuse the user's choice? The same job, why do users choose OS in your wishes? If you say back, the simple and easy to use of Windows is not imagined. Its power will be fully utilized when it is used in the domain. The subordinates of my secondary school students can manage the AD domain, two subordinates, and they are girls, one of them is relatively powerful, including the domain, mobile operating host, disaster recovery, establish a subnet, Establish rules, plan users minimum permissions, DNS, DHCP, IIS, can be completed independently. They can independently complete the MS's Windows2000 self-study tutorial, which is the ease of use of Windows I have seen. Maybe I am very beautiful, there is a deviation to the understanding of ease of use, and the majority of Linux fans are criticized.
As for the Linux desktop stable, safe friends, take out half of your effort to study Linux, go to formal learning Windows, see how the effect will be. In fact, CodingPcpig is right: ourselves 装 Software (actually some rotten seven-eight-piece crack software), some of the websites of not three, and who is reloading the system? Try with Linux? I don't believe it. However, for the time being, the website and software that competes for Linux is still relatively small. There is also an important factor: many of us work under the permission of the super user, narrow your user permissions, see how the effect will work.
Take a look, listen to the user's idea, can you know why Windows can stand in the desktop application. Also, look at some cases that truly use Windows! If there is no chance around, it will recommend the TechNet of the MS website to see those video tutorials, experience it.
Ok, talk nonsense, there are so many, 1 o'clock. Please agree with the person to take a hand, do not agree with the criticism, swearing, personal attack, then don't say it, you will be able to write it out, you can write it out to tarnish your own image. (Attach: I think Linux is still in terms of server application, and there are more development space)
