Quality is a factor in the connotation of a value quality concept of a (certain) person. The factor of political or emotion - if it is from another definition of quality, this is obvious. In the early days of our current discussion, the concept of user demand is still a bit naive - who needs the need to consider first? It is not clear here - so this concept is not much. The following is more operability per proliferation:
Quality is the value of a (certain) person.
What I said here is worth "in order to make your needs satisfaction, will people prefer to pay any or what action?" Tell, if Terra is not my outer woman, but MINICOZY president . If the project supervisor knows that his president will take what emotional action for this matter, I am afraid that he has long been another appearance for the definition of the quality of the text processing software. If this is true, then when determining which errors should be fixed in the software, I am afraid Terra's opinion will be the best. All in all, the definition of quality will always have political and emotional colors because it always has to make through a series of decisions to determine which opinions should be baptized. These opinions are relatively important. Of course, this political and emotional decision-making process - just like all political and emotional important decisions - most of the time, not perceived by the public, this is very suitable for software developers, they are happy to make a The look of rationalism. This definition of quality, why don't you always agree with its actual role? The reason is here. Even those who make these decisions are mind, and in most, they will lose this phenomenon, so our work has become more difficult. It is also thought that if the supervisor responsible for software quality cannot guarantee that the mind is relying on the public's mind, then a crucial work is at least to ensure that it is truly used to determine. This is also one of our main tasks.
Precision CRIBBAGE
In order to verify our understanding of the above definition and its applicability, let's take a look at another story: When you are young, one of my favorite games is to play CRIBBAGE card games with my father. The inventors of this game are the poet Johnsuckling Jazz {John Sa Rum (1609-1642), the British poet and the court. Its poetry includes Session of the Poets, The Constant Lover, Aglaura and Ballad of A Wedding, etc., their works have a witty, sometimes even open a smile. - Translator Note} It is extremely popular in some places in the world, but people in other places may not know about this game. After the father died, I still missed the time to play with the cribbage card with him, so I hope I can find a fixed signature partner. Finally, I am very happy to discover a Cribbage game sharing software running on the Macintosh platform, named Precision CribbageTM, the author is Doug Brent in San Jose, California. I think precision cribbage is a well-designed software work, which is more obvious if it is compared with most shared software. Especially for me, the software provides me with a good game - despite its level, usually there is only a ten game to win me one to two. So I asked Doug to send a letter to Doug, paying the use of shared software, after which it has played many times. Even so, I still discovered two obvious errors in the scoring algorithm of Precision Cribage. The first error is: When you have three cards in your hand, the rest of the two points is the same (the phrase "of a poker brand is the so-called Full House)," gourd. There are three cards for poker, and there are two different card points. For example: (. K, .k, .k; .4, .4), or (.6, .6, .6; .8, .8). - Translator Note ") When its scales have an error intermittently. Obviously, this error is not intentional, because in some, this type of score is completely correct. Figure 1-2 Example of score errors in a CRIBBAGE card game. The correct score should be 4, not 8 {Scheduled rules according to Cribbage card, in this hand, a pair (.2 and .2) value 2 points, one 15 combination (.9 and .6) The value is 2 points, a total of 4 points. - Translator Note}. The second error is caused by the author to understand the score rules (for a program that can play card games with people). This is certainly part of the demand). When there are three trocraped cards in hand, and the fourth color card has been cut, it should still be scored. For this situation, I can fully prove to be wrong from mathematics. The reason why this story is related to the problems we discussed, because although there are two scoring errors in this game software, I am still completely satisfied with Precision Cribbage, so I have to squeeze out for hours every week. Valuable time to play this game, I am also happy to pay the usage fee of shared software - although I can save this money, don't worry about any form of punishment.
