Finally found a little meaningful post on 51testing, and organize each point. The words are more intense, and I will look at Lele.
Postal Title: Software Test Engineer Test Release Posted Posted by Jackei
The content of this test comes from two years of software test engineer recruitment experience, does not involve any confidential information or privacy information, hoping to provide some reference or help for friends who are about to go to test or have started software testing career.
The document is Word format, which is not converted into PDF. It is to hope that this can be used as an open document for everyone. I don't mind if you use this document to apply in your own job. I hope every look. People who have this document can get some gains from it.
I also hope that more masters will be able to stand together for the development of this industry together after I thrown this "brick".
Click to download http://www.cnblogs.com/jackei/archive/2005/03/17/120183.html
The owner said (the following blue background is the post-owner reply):
The purpose of designing this test is to hope that you can use the written test, as much as possible, you can see the case of software testing, software engineering and software quality assurance, and guide the candidates to show yourself as much as possible. Work experience in work. My purpose is to achieve an effect of communicating through paper and applicants, allowing candidates to summarize and reflect on their thoughts and experiences during their answers. In the work of the interview, I will give the candidates to some testing knowledge or answers some of the problems and problems, and I hope that the candidates can be ignored. Similarly, if the candidate can remember the questions in this test, then you can do a good learning plan and guide, because in my opinion, this is my requirements for an excellent test engineer - Of course, to patiently complete this test from head until the end, it means that a basic requirement for testing engineers - patience ^ _ ^
It was also a interview test question. It is mainly to facilitate the use of the employees when the main examiner does not supply the employer when the company is not in the company.
In a sound, someone stands out (the following yellow background for this netizen a reply, I hide its net name):
Look, the full book is a big truth, the concept of Xuan deficiency, the knowledge of the test is from practice, not the back of the back book. Which company gives you such a interview question, you can order not to go.
A, I am sorry, this question is me. Of course, this question is still not very perfect, but this is mainly because I have limited personal levels and there is no direct relationship with the company. If you can, I hope you can help add or modify it, thank you.
The landlord is self-satisfied, and it is uncomfortable. I can't do it.
01. Why do you want to carry out software testing in a team?
Demand: This question is lost, try which test is not done in the team? Where is the development test? If the author wants to ask "Software needs to test", then ask the programmer "What is the software", it is really a boring and extensive topic.
02. Do you understand the software testing process of the company working in the past? If you know, please try to do something in this process? What different characters are made by different roles?
Demand: This topic is slightly active, but research is really an empty problem. The author I am afraid I don't know when the software test process starts from the software life cycle, when will it end, otherwise it will not ask the third issue.
03. Do you know the software development process of the company working in the past? If you understand, do you have a complete development process to do what work? What different characters are made by different roles? (For software test parts, you can briefly) Signification: Suggested the author's TITLE to change to "Software Quality Assurance Engineer's written test questions"
04. What kind of work did you have to do in the past test work? Which part of these is best at?
Demand: This issue is not suitable for written test, asking for interviews, follow-up, according to the answer to the interview, do an in-depth question. In the written test, it is undoubtedly a problem of a false big space.
05. What are your familiar software test types? Please try to compare the differences and linkages of these different test types (such as functional testing, performance testing ...)
Demolition: This problem has put a satellite. What is the software test type? The cycle can be tested from the unit to the acceptance test, and there is a black box test and white box test according to the test technology, and there is still static analysis and dynamic inspection according to the measured software. . . . . . The author can be said that all the instructions of all the tests in the world are exhausted, and the candidates are really difficult.
06. Please try to compare the differences and contacts of black box testing, white box testing, unit testing, integration testing, system testing, and acceptance testing.
Demand: A basic error: Black box test and white box test belong to test technology, that is, test methods, can be applied to different specific tests; unit testing. . . Acceptance testing test strategy issues, that is, the corresponding test point in the life cycle developed in software. Isn't the concept of a division? What is more comparable?
I still want to write it again, I have seen this test question, I am too lazy.
The basic skills of the written test top, the interview should be changed, but I see it just the opposite. Throughout your written test topic, a measurable technical question is not, and the landlord has already only study test management, don't you write Test Case?
Haha
Don't blame, I am too embarrassed, the landlord sent a post to say that it is a throwing brick to jade, but the word is said to be guided by the testers, contribute to the software industry, and puts out a pair of attitude fingers, this is too hypocritical. Let's discuss, the forum is a warm discussion, a place to shoot bricks, not who is showing your own qualifications, educating others. In this way, I don't know if the landlord is in the test industry, no one is, or really thinks that I am going to go to the peak. In addition, these interview questions itself makes basic concept errors, I don't know if the test is a test, or the landlord I want to know the answer. Haha
A, thank you very much, I do not know the answer to these questions, but also to reintegrate this question, then attach the answer to help us with these beginners, how?
The biggest failure of the written test: One hundred writers have one hundred answers, one hundred exams can give a hundred different scores. This question does not have to be sorted out, burn it directly. The landlord, do you think that you ask questions? This topic is to say that it is the ability to examine the writer, it is better to say that it is to examine the idea of the writer and the extent of your own cognitive.
Netizen B:
A, you can give you your own correct answer to everyone, believe that most of it is also right, write a reference answer to help everyone. Don't always say that the bamboo is not good here, the bamboo can write this question, it is already a great help to everyone, your brick does not take this :)
Netizen C speaking:
From A, I agree with the point of view of the pen test: the written test cannot be 100 writes have a one hundred answers, and hundreds of exams give a hundred different scores. If it is such a question, it should be put it Asked when the interview, I don't know if the landlord agrees with this. But then, if the candidate can use a pen to deal with these problems, it is also a good thing ... but what questions say that in the pen test, it is not suitable. If the candidates see such questions, I will feel that the topic (company) urgently needs to test the testers, and even if the company has the skill level of the company's existing test team ...
In fact, I don't want everyone to be a written test argument. I don't really like a written test because the written test usually gives the applicant too much pressure. For a "examine the idea of examiners and your own cognition", I want to try to interview or written, are we all doing the candidates? I personally feel more important to see if I have my own point and think about whether I have my own point of view, whether I have worked in actual work and think. If the candidates have a better way for a certain job, we can also consider adopting. To be honest, we can't say that the interviewer must be a master, you must evaluate whether the answer to the employer is correct. But as an interviewer, at least in a certain aspect, you can observe and evaluate the ability and quality of the candidate and the quality of the candidate in an aspect. The attitude is in line with the needs of the company's position - this is why it usually scheduled a few Different interviewers. I really can't think of which company's interviewer is fully ejected with your candidates with your own point of view.
In addition, from the reply from A. It is also a test engineer with a certain level. I don't know if I can really organize a better test question.
There is always a love for your own mistakes to find a variety of reasons. Haha B, C look at the official, can say that from your bones, it is considered that the test is a low technical content, and the high and low measurement of test level is to play with the concept and theory of the vitality. Like all the work, it is impossible to depart from the actual working environment. From the measured software system to the middleware, the operating system platform or even program design, compilation principle, which is the material?
Program test under UNIX system, at least understand Unix common commands, shell programming, do performance test, at least understand system configuration, software architecture, and even program design principles, compilation principle, otherwise memory overflow, do not know how to return System testing of the interface is at least to know the test case design method, some scripts run principles, checkpoint intercept methods, give the tester a system, inspect what he designs a test tool is not too much.
You have such a topic to judge the level of testers, it is simply in contemining the technical content of software testing (of course, most testors are currently not high, but don't mean this work is not high)
Fortunately, the future of the software test did not master in your hands, otherwise it became three representatives, and the four seas were all accurate, but they did not speak everywhere.
You have never been developed more than a year, or you may have not been developed. It seems that the level of software testers in the future requires software developers to help, and they should let them test.
