Text / Li Hongjun
── Friends believe that if you can't prove that diamonds are important than lollipops, the lollipop must be important than diamonds? Zheng Lu and Wu Shen is a good friend. The following is a dialogue about the belief unless he can stand it, Wu: Zheng brother, I have never understood, so much like you have thought, and very rational people, why believe God. Can you prove God? Zheng: can't. If I can prove that God exists, unless I am more intelligent than him, even more wisdom. If so, don't believe him, but believe me. Wu: Since you can't prove, can you know God? Zheng: I know God needs to rely on your confidence. Wu: I really want to believe, I can't believe it. Anyone can't convince I believe that God, unless God stands in front of me, or give me a look. Zheng: Jesus is standing in front of you, and all the miracles he have passed will, if you don't want to believe, you still will still believe it. You will use a variety of methods to explain, say that it will be a new discovery. Wu: That is not necessarily. However, I think anything must be learned after scientific analysis. I can't accept what I have accepted, I am hard to believe. Zheng: The problem is, confuse you, it is not your rationality, because you only make judgments with observation and feelings, but don't really think. Let you believe that there is God, not rationality, nor science, not philosophical, but support the most fundamental things behind your rationality and judgment, that is your belief. Wu: Belief? I have no beliefs. Zheng: You are wrong, no one has no belief, everyone has its own belief. But no one can have two opposite beliefs at the same time. Wu: What is a belief? Zheng: Belief is actually a manifestation of a person's world view in life. The worldview is the most basic assumption that people objectively realized worldwide. Wu: I know this concept of the world, but what is the relationship with my beliefs? Zheng: Many people think that they are living in "actual", but they don't know that they have lived in their own world view. Because in unconscious, he has regarded his world view as "actual". His way of thinking, life goals, judgment criteria, values are inseparable from this "actual", in fact, this is his faith. When a new concept is contradictory with his "actual", he will use his own inherent way and standard, think about and judge this new concept, and then decide to accept or refuse this concept according to his own understanding. . Diamond or a lollipop? Wu: You can't give examples of explanation. Zheng: If there is a big diamond and a lollipop, you can only choose, which one do you choose? Wu: Of course I chose diamonds. Zheng: If you put them in front of a child, how will he choose? Wu: Children don't know the value of diamonds, he will choose a lollipop. Zheng: Then you can give this child to prove that diamond is more important than a lollipop? Wu: This is probably it is hard to give him prove, he can't understand. Zheng: If you can't prove that diamonds are important than lollipops, the lollipop must be important than diamonds? Wu: What is this logic? Only children think this. Zheng: The same logic, leads to the idiotists to think: If you can't prove God, then God must not exist. Wu: Still not the same.
Children don't know diamonds and can only explain his knowledge. And we are adults. Zheng: When the child chooses a lollipop, he will not think that his knowledge is limited, knowing his choice may be wrong? Wu: It should not be, he will not suspect that the lollipop is more important than diamonds. Zheng: This is what I want to emphasize. Everyone is inadvertently, forming the concept of thinking "correctness", and here is the discrimination standard. When encountering a new concept, his first reaction is not to reflect whether it is correct, but not thinking to use his "standard" in his own. Anyone who is opposite, he will refuse to accept. The remaining "infinite" possibility Wu: I don't agree to this. I am very open, you can accept any new ideas. Zheng: Do you accept Jesus? Wu: I don't accept the reason, because you can't prove God's existence. Zheng: Your reason is because of your deep-rooted unsyardial belief. "No God" has already formed, under this ideological structure, more about God's existence of the voucher is meaningless. Because of your judgment under any evidence, it is based on "no god". Wu: Not so serious. I have never deliberately deny the existence of God. In fact, I am also unable to really have such a good Almighty God that you say. Zheng: You didn't feel your "deliberate" denied God, just explain this problem. What do you think when you read about the miracle of the Bible? Wu: This depends on the specific situation. Some places may be deliberately fabricated, some places may record distortion. Of course, there are some natural phenomena we have not found yet, or may be due to any reason that cannot be explained. Zheng: In the face of the miracles of Jesus, you believe in "any" possible reasons, but only rejects a possibility, that is: He is God! You see, you have already excluded the answer, in the remaining infrequent "possibility", can you find a real answer? If so, do you have any significance to you? Is this still "deliberate" denied God? I believe that your "deliberate" is "unconscious", and you "unconsciously" deliberately "deny God, is it caused by your unpopular belief? It seems that the key is rational Wu: no God is faith? First heard. Zheng: Can you prove that God does not exist? Wu: Oh ... I certainly can't prove. Logically, you can never prove that anything does not exist. Zheng: Very correct! Then you can only "believe" God does not exist. And I am very determined, think that it is true. In life, this kind of belief is unknowingly dominates all your thinking and judgment. This is your faith. Wu: It seems to be a bit truth. But you can't prove God's existence, and there is no reason to be correct, and it is also faith. Zheng: So, there is a feeling of beliefs, and there is a belief that the two is the opposite belief. You have already selected the latter in the subtlety, you can't accept the former at the same time, unless you first give up the original belief. Wu: Your Christ is too tightening. Why do I have to give up my beliefs, and choose you? Zheng: I didn't force you to accept my beliefs, just helped you understand, the key we discussed, is not a rational problem, but the differences in faith. An attorney and an atheist, it is meaningless to discuss God in the rational level, because the basic concepts held by both are incompatible. Wu: I seem to understand what you are saying now.
In this way, the belief who believes that the theory will never believe in God. Zheng: Half of it. Once you realize that we are in terms of beliefs, rather than rationality, you should not only find reasons for rationality, but it should be inspected, whether the beliefs you hold are correct and reliable. If you are unreliable, you must be brave enough to find a more real and reliable belief. Do you think about it, is it reliable without my mind? Can't close to Wu: You say this, I want to think about it carefully. That's right, noism really questioned with the reliability of God, but it is impossible to provide reliable arguments for its own establishment. But is Christian beliefs that must be true and reliable? Zheng: Christians are not some messy boxes of messy, but a complete set of the mystery between God, people and the universe. There will be many problems with initial contacts. If you are not intimidated by these problems, it is slowly geography, find answers, you will be surprised to discover, what is true. Wu: I have been going to study several times, some questions they answer some truth. But in rational, I can't accept the concept of God. Although there is no reliable argument that there is no symptom itself, it is very reasonable to doubt it. Zheng: Let us return to the most basic problem, can you prove that there is no god? Wu: No, but you can't prove God. Zheng: Correct, then we can not find such a conclusion, "God exists or whether this problem cannot be proven to be rationality." Wu: It seems like this. Zheng: In this way, the existence of skeptics can only be a kind of suspicion, what is the reason? Wu: Where is the truth of my theory? Zheng: This is one of our focus of the Bible. If you want to understand if the Bible makes sense, you must first know what the Bible is talking about. And often when you accept the teaching of the Bible, you can understand the truth. That is, people often say, first believe, after understanding. Wu: Since all beliefs, it is impossible to use rationality to analyze, and naturally, I can't understand. So I think, let me know, don't believe it, no one is unclear. Who is reasonable. Zheng: I only hear half of it. Rationality will be limited in two places, the first is where the rationality is unreasonable, and the second is a place that is beyond rationality. Unymortic beliefs are not rational because it cannot form a statement. However, Christian beliefs are both rationality, and transcend people's rationality, so people can understand and understand it in their extent to which rationality can achieve. In the process of understanding and understanding, it is inseparable, otherwise it is superstition. Wu: You just said that rationality can not be used to know God, now I know that I know God does not open rationality, is this the contradiction before and after? Zheng: Do not take extremes. I didn't say "knowing" God can't use rationality. I just said that I can't use rational "prove" God, or I can't justify my rationality. There is a great difference between this. Wu: That is, it can't be rational, and it is impossible to rely. Zheng: very correct. Rationality is not useless, nor is it. Unconscious and unknown worse Wu: What role is in terms of belief? What is the relationship with confidence? Zheng: The relationship between confidence and rationality is not the three words can be explained. I can only answer you today, the real faith is the understanding and descending of truth, the truth is absolutely not reasonable. At the same time, the truth must be greater than rationality, and people only rely on rationally and cannot truly understand the truth. Therefore, in the truth, confidence is dominant.
