Although it has been nearly 20 years, I will still remember the scene now.
I went to some place to go to relatives. The biggest difficulty in seeing it is to go to the toilet. Local habits are convenient after the house. But it was in the summer, there were a lot of small bugs to fly, and every time XX my ass is bitten a lot of big bags.
So I am in listening to the relatives where the nearest public toilet is, anyway, the bug in the room is always less).
Less nonsense, I am very hard to find the toilet, just stayed at the door:
On the floor of the toilet (I pointed to a dung pit, the ground) is full of three-inch feces, and I can't go to the feces. After searching, I found that there were several bricks in the feces, and the faint approximately approximately the path to the manure pit. So I jumped on the first brick, the second brick, but the third brick is too far away, so I jumped back.
About the story of the toilet is over (there is no dramatic ending, for example, I accidentally fall into the dung pit, and then a good people will see the righteousness and the like.).
What I want to say is that it can be inferred that there is more public management related to this toilet (I didn't seem to have private toilets). Later, this place was known in some of the villages in the village. I think this place is so famous and the worse management of the toilet is linked. If you look at the words of the Southern Weekend, you will understand what I mean.
That's the experience of the toilet made my young hearts have been stimulated. I have been considering this issue in the past 20 years, how to manage public toilets? After 20 years of hard work, I have a little sentiment now.
In fact, it is very simple, just do one:
There is dirty on the ground to clean up clean.
Now returning to some of the projects I have participated, the taste of these projects is better than "the toilet for 20 years".
I know these projects very well, you can clearly illustrate which day begins to start measuring.
Just starting from the moment of using environment variables, a programmer decides to use environment variables to specify a path of a module, ah, very simple, enter a simple DOS command (or double-click a DLL). Then the programmer verbally informs someone in the team.
Another programmer has done the same thing, now I want to enter two DOS commands (or double the mouse twice) to test the program. Then the third fourth programmer .... Then, things worse, due to some mysterious reason, you must enter the command in some order or double-click the mouse to let the program run. When I complained, every programmer thinks this is a little thing, because of his (her) single person, you can operate once.
This typical scene can also be lifted.
A programmer likes to use inheritance, so I must deal with both classes in order to use a feature in his module. Then he realized a feature, I got two classes. Trouble is that a feature requires the above two functional interactions, so I am now dealing with four classes. Then another programmer took over these four classes, he inherited two subclasses in four classes to get their own subclasses, so I have possible dealing with 9 classes.
If this scene is still not typical, let me give a more "advanced" example:
We know that each design pattern is generally involved in four classes. A programmer likes to use design mode ...
Ok, actually I don't complain how the programmer is.
I really want to ask, who is cleaning the toilet? Where is the project manager? Architect Where? If no one cleans the toilet, what is the so-called toilet management?
