K] [N g of a r kTM 'S the Revelation of Ai
K] Artificial Intelligence Revelation of Ng of A R KTM
What's it mean to be human, anyway?
What does "humanity" mean?
Revision 0.1
By Charles Platt
K] [N g of a r kTM translation
[This topic is "Turing Test". The Tulex Test awards launched by the wonderful Robna attracted a lot of people's eyes. Now let's take a look at the human participants of this article as a map spirit test before and after the game. ]
Hugh Loebner
Hugh Robna
What's it mean to be human, anyway?
What does "humanity" mean?
Charles Platt Reports on The Latest Battle To Determine The Most Human Computer, Even As He Worries That He May Be The Least Human Human.
Regarding the biggest competition of the most human computer, Charles Prat reported its latest progress; even though he worried that he might be the most lack of human humanity [translation: "The most lack of human humanity?" See below for details.
By Charles Platt
Charles Platt Author
Robert Epstein is Giving US All A Pep Talk. "You Must Work Very Hard To Convince The Judges" You Shouldn't Have Any Trouble Doing That - Because You Are Human. "Robert · Ai Pletan gives us everyone, "You must work hard to let the appraisers believe in you is human,", he said to us, "and you should do this should not be too difficult - because you are human. "A droll fellow, this Epstein. He wears Dr. Martens boots, black jeans, a black shirt, a Mickey Mouse tie, and an earring. His longish hair is brushed straight back and flips up over his collar. Five of us are listening to him in a beige conference room on the brand-new campus of California State University at San Marcos, near San Diego. Soon we will be put in front of computer terminals, where we will follow Epstein's instructions and, yes, do our best to Seem Human. This Emitan is an interesting guy. He wears Dr.marten boots, black jeans, black shirt, with a rice mouse tie, string of earrings. He brought his slight hair to the back and raised it from the collar. In a bacteria, California, a new campus, a new campus, a new campus, a new campus, a new campus. Soon we will be brought to the computer terminal, under the guidance of Erewstein - Yes - do what you can make yourself like a human. Our purpose is to find out whether 10 judges can tell the difference between humans and artificial-intelligence programs, when they are online at the same time The people and the programs will be ranked in order of humanness;. The program that scores highest will win ITS Author US $ 2,000. Our purpose is to figure out whether the ten identification personnel can identify the difference between human and artificial intelligence programs. Based on the degree of humanity, people and computer programs participating in them will be discharged; and the highest score of the score will win two thousand dollars for their creators.
The inspiration for this event dates back to the earliest days of computing. In 1950, pioneer Alan Turing proposed that if a computer could successfully impersonate a human being during a free-form exchange of text messages, then for all practical purposes, the computer should The inspiration of this can be traced back to the initial period in the field. In 1950, the Alan Turning is calculated, and if a computer can successfully imitate the human role in the form of free text information, then this computer should be considered intelligent for any realistic use. of. This soon became known as the "Turing test," and it sparked endless academic debate. Could a computer use trickery to emulate human responses without being intelligent? What did "intelligence" really mean, anyway? Soon this formulation is called " Tulex test "is widely known, and has stimulated an endless academic debate. Can a non-smart computer use spoofing means to follow the way humans? What does "intelligence" mean? The debate was never resolved because, oddly enough, no one ran the experiment until 1991, when a maverick named Hugh Loebner decided to underwrite it with his own money. Loebner offered $ 100,000 to the first person who could devise a program that would fool 10 judges During Three Hours of Unrestricted Conversation. The argument has never been a result, because - very strange - never did this experiment, until 1991, a separate person named Hugh Robn decided to spend his own money To support this experiment. Robun took out 100,000 US dollars, the award to the first person invented such a program - the program can deceive ten appraisers during the three-hour conversation of content unrestricted. This was way beyond current capabilities, so Loebner also set up an annual $ 2,000 prize for the program that seemed most nearly human. And to make things even easier, he allowed each programmer to choose just one topic for conversation. This requires far beyond The level that is currently can achieve, so Robna has also established a bonus of 20,000 US dollars to grant the most human procedural creator. In addition, in order to make the test more simplified, he also allows each of the challenges to pick a single topic in the human-machine dialogue.
So here I am at the fourth Loebner contest, sitting and listening to Robert Epstein, the director of the annual event. (Loebner participates mainly as an observer.) In experimental jargon, my companions and I are known as "confederates," because we S.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Sitting listening to the annual contest director Robert Erewstein speech. (Robuna is mainly engaged in the observer.) In the case of the experiment, I and my compatriots are called "confedes", because we will join Erewstein, try to deceive the appraisers . We must try to perform some humanity as much as possible so that the computers have a competitive standard. Epstein is a behavioral psychologist who got his doctorate under BF Skinner. So, naturally enough, he has invented a tricky little system of rewards and punishments for us. "You are in competition not only with the programs, but with each other," he TELLS USA Human Human. And One of You Will Be Ranked The Least Human Human. "Your collections May mout in the media." Erewstein is A behavioral psychologist won a doctorate under the guidance of BF Sky. It is therefore conceivable that he invented a small amount of ambitious system for participants in our participants. "You must not only compete with computer programs, and there is also a competition between each other." He told us. "One of you will be awarded the award of 'the most human human'. Another one will be ranked as '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' ''. To the media. "HMM. As I thinkt it, i realize That I Definitely do Not Want to be Written Up in The National Press as the Least Human Particles in An Artificial Intelligence Contest. I'm Going to To Do Whatever It Takes To Seem Totally, 100 Percent Human When We Start Chatting Online. Well. I wondered; I realized that I certainly didn't want to be described by a national publication as "the most lack of humanity in a human intelligence."
As long as the online chat is started, I have to express 100% humanization anyway. But this raises Some Weird Questions. I am Human, SO why SHOULD I NEED TO FAKE IT? IS IT POSSIBLE for me to see the book more human Than I really am? And if So, What's the best strategy? But there is a embarrassment here Question: I am human, why do you want to pretend like a (special person-friendly) human? I am likely to express more like human beings than usual? If possible, is there any good strategy? This kind of speculation probably is not a good idea, because it raises more questions than it answers, and I'm liable to find myself paralyzed by self-conscious introspection. In other words, if I try to seem more human, I ' So this thinking may not be a good idea, because the problem introduced is more than the problem that can answer, I may also be paralyzed because of self-reflection. In other words, if I deliberately express more like human, the result is even more like. I glance around at the other four confederates. None of them seems to be bothered by this kind self-analysis. The young woman nearest me is a journalist named Linda Tontini who writes for a local newspaper about city-hall politics. She seems friendly, Spontaneous, Outgoing - The Absolute Antithesis of "Computer Geek." As I think "MOST HUMAN HUMAN" Award. I gave a look around, I took the other four collars. By. They seem to have not been similar to my self-analysis like me. The recent young woman from me is a journalist called Linda Tongtini. She has written a local newspaper on the municipal department. She seems to be friendly, nature, generous - tells the decision of "Computer GEEK". " I looked at the sky with people, I thought that she would not like the "most human" award. As for me, i fear the worst. And I am afraid of the worst case.
After our briefing, I'm introduced to Hugh Loebner. He's an affable character, slightly overweight, smiling benevolently at the world from behind a gray beard and oval wire-framed glasses. He talks quickly, with pedantic precision. I ask him why he's Willing to Pledge $ 100,000 for a basce of smart Software. IS IT All His OWN Money? After a brief, I was introduced to Hurabina. He is an amiable person, slightly biased, from gray beard and oval metal side, becomes a kind smile to the world. He talked quickly, and he was very accurate in his words. I asked him, why he is willing to take 100,000 US dollars to seek a chanting software, is that all his own money? "My father passed away and left me, not rich, but with some discretionary income," he says. "And I have my own business, Crown Industries - we make roll-up plastic lighted portable disco dance floors." He smiles and shrugs As if He Knows It Sounds Odd But Doesn't Care. "My father is too late, although it is not rich, but still leaves me some freely giving income," he said. "And I also have my own business, Crown Industries - we have a rolling plastic luminescent laptop Diqi high dance floor." He smiled and shrugged, as if he knew that this sounded weird. He doesn't care. Loebner has had some personal experience programming computers, but his doctorate is in sociology. Perhaps because of this, at least one person in the artificial intelligence community views him skeptically. In 1994, a Harvard researcher in computational linguistics complained publicly that Loebner's prize encourages scientists To Fake Human Behavior Using Cheap Tricks Instead of "True" Ai. Robun also has some computer programming personal experience, but he is still a physician of sociology. Perhaps it is at this time, at least one of the people who have a skeptical look at him. In 1994, a Harvard's computational language researchers made a public complaint that Robuna's prize was to encourage scientists to make human behaviors, rather than adopting "real" artificial intelligence.
Naturally, Loebner has a different perspective. "I see scientific research as being, in a mathematical sense, a form of chaotic human behavior," he tells me. "In chaos theory, the smallest initial perturbation can result in a huge change downstream. So, since I was the first person to create and fund this contest, I may turn out to be a precipitating factor. Ultimately, if we're capable of creating a computer that is sentient, then from the point of view of that computer, humans will be gods. I like to think of intelligent machines going out across the universe with this semimythic concept of human demigods. And just maybe, "he smiles happily," they'll remember me. "of course, Loebner has a different view . "From the perspective of mathematics, I regard the scientific research as a chaotic human behavior," he told me. "In Chaos Theory, the most tintered initial confusion may result in subsequent huge downstream changes. So, given that I am the first person to create and fund this competition, I may become a rising factor. In the end, if we have Ability to create a computer with awareness, then from this computer's perspective, human beings are their God. I imagined, smart machines took this concept of half-god-style concept about Hardpot, walking in the universe In this case, maybe, "He is happy to laugh," they will remember me. "Each year, Along With His Check for $ 2,000, Loebner Gives A Bronze Medal To the Contest Winner. He Pulls Out the Medal and Shows It to Me Alan Turing is in Bas-Relief On One Side, And Loebner on The Other. Doesn't All this Seem a little ... EgoStical? Every year, Robina will give the copper medal with a 20,000-dollar check to the competition winner. He took the medal to show me. The medal as a sneak carousel, and the other is Robina himself.
This doesn't look at it ... "I've Been Called Emotistical," He Agrees Cheerfully. "I've Also Been Called Lazy. Well, I am Lazy. I'd Like Computers To Do All The Work - Which Is One Reason I'm INTERESTED IN Artificial Intelligence As the Contestion, So Perhaps I have a right to be evotistical. "" I was considered to be a big, "he was happy to agree. "I have been considered lazy. Yes, I am very lazy. I hope the computer can do all the work for me - this is a reason why I am interested in artificial intelligence. However, this competition is attracted A lot of attention, maybe I should have the right to get a big one. "But with all the worldy artificial intelligent? But, there are so many things that are worth investing in the world, why he Will you choose artificial intelligence? "So far," he says, "the four contests have cost me about $ 25,000. If I contributed the same amount of money to AIDS research or anything else, I doubt it would have made a more significant impact on society or science. I think "He Pauses Reflective". "He Pauses Reflective". "He said," He said, "The four games spent about 20,000 US dollars. But if I use the same money to invest To AIDS research or other things above, I doubt that the impact of society or science will not be more bigger than engage in artificial intelligence. I think that developing an artificial wisdom should have extremely huge to society. Impact. "Then he was deeply awkward. "IT May Also Help Me To Sell More of My ROLL-UP Plastic Lighted Portable Disco Dance Floors." "This can also be sold more versatile plastic luminescent portable Diqi high dance floor." After Lunch , I go with the other confederates into a windowless computer lab. the judges have already been sequestered in another room next door, and our only contact with them be via will computer terminals, at least until the contest is over. after lunch, I and Other colonists came to a computer laboratory with no windows. The appraisers have long been isolated from us in another room next door; at least before the game, we are the only contact with them is the computer terminal.
We sit on blue plastic chairs in front of computer screens, each of which displays a topic heading we had already chosen for our online chat. My topic is cryonics, because I happen to be the vice president of a cryonics organization named CryoCare, and I 'M hoping the subject will spark deep, Soul-searching discussions about life-and-death issues Only a human can Dear with meaningfully. We have a seat on the blue plastic chair in front of the computer, one showing one on each screen. The title is the topic that our own online chat will be involved. The topic I chose is human freezing, because I happen to be a vice chairman named Cryocare, and I hope that I can borrow this topic to trigger a number of deep, explore the discussion of the soul - then There is only human beings that can effectively be correct, and the topic of life and death. Linda Tontini sits at the terminal next to mine. Her topic is The Rolling Stones. To my left is another confederate named Frederick Allen, who writes for American Heritage. He's going to chat about classical music. I sat Linda Tontini On the left terminal. Her topic is a rolling stone band. Another colleague in my left is Friedrick Alan, and he writes an article for American Heritage. He is preparing to talk about the topic of classical music. To My Right, Greg Flakus, from Voice of America, Has Chosen American History, And Laura Groch, From A local newspaper, Will Discuss NewSpaper COMICS. In my right, Voice of America's Gragfa Lucus chose topic about American history; Laura Croach from a local newspaper intended to talk about the book. Five other terminals are unattended, because they will be controlled via modems by AI programs running on remote systems These programs will discuss their own topics:. Environmental issues, classic Star Trek, sex education, the OJ Simpson trial, and cats versus dogs another. There are no one before the five terminals, because they will be controlled by the artificial smart programs on the remote system. These programs are each will talk about their own topics: environmental issues, classic "Star Trek" series, sex education, o.j. Simpson trial, and family to the cat and dog.
It dawns on me that all the topics - even those of the AI programs - are much more normal than mine What was I thinking of, picking a wacky subject like cryonics It's going to make me seem like a nerdy weirdo me this.?. Understand, all topics - even topics of those artificial intelligence procedures - more than I choose more. What did I think in the beginning - actually picked a weird topic such as human freezing? This will make me look like an annoying strange. The First Question Appears ON My Computer's Screen. My Judge Laboriously Types: "What is The Difference Between Cryonics and Cryogenics?" The first question appeared on my computer screen. Issue the following problem with the appraisers I discussed: "What is the difference between human cold frozen and low-temperature learning?" There's no way i can give a human-sounding answer to a question as Dry as this. to seem human, I need to show emotion - but if my emotions are excessive compared with the question, the effect will be false It's a trap:. the degree to which I can seem human is limited by the humanness of the judge who is interrogating ME. For such a problem, I don't have a way to give an answer that contains humanized colors. In order to perform humanized, I need to show a certain emotion - but if I have exaggerated the emotions of this problem, it will be counterproductive. This is an unable to extricate the situation: The degree of humanity I have shown depends on the degree of humanity of the identification personnel. This is exasperating. But Wait; Irritability Is A Human Response, So Maybe I Should Play IT Up. I Tell My Judge NOT To ask Such Boring Questions ... The Judge Makes a snippy ... and forin minutes, we're Having a flame war. This is really mad. However, etc., irritability is an unique reflection of human beings, so I may try to try this trick. I told the appraisers, don't ask this boring problem, so the appraisers have made an arrogant response, so after a few minutes, we launched a fire-fighting tape.
MeanWhile, Frederick Allen Has Been Asked, "Do you know CLAUDE DEBUSY's Middle Name?" And On Linda Tontini's Screen I See The Question, "Complete this: i can't get no .... What?" With this, Eph Lendrick Alan asked the appraisers: "Do you know the middle name of Crawder Debussy?"; On the screen of Linda Tongnti, I saw such a question: "Take this After being finished: i can't get no .... What is it? "" Sympathy for the devil, "SHE REPLIES Humorously. But Maybe That's Not Such a Great Idea. If Her Judge Doesn't Get the Joke, SHE 'Ll Seem Like a Malfunctioning Program. "Sympathy for the Devil," She is humorous. But that may not be a good idea. If the appraisers discussed with her do not accept this joke, she looks like a fault program. After Eight Minutes, The Judges Rotate So Each of Them Has A Chance To Tackle Another Topic. Linda's New Judge Comes Online, And He Asks, "What Do you notice if you're close Up When Mick Jagger Smiles?" After 8 minutes, The identification personnel rotate, so that they have the opportunity to touch another topic. The new round of appraisers who talk to Linda took the line, then he asked: "If you are close to him when you laugh in Mick Jager, what do you find?" A Devious Question, But I know the Answer : Jagger Has A Diamond Set in One of His Teeth. Should I Her Out? Hell, No, She Has Enough of An Advantage Already! I Turn My Attertion Back to My Screen. My New Judge Asks Me, "What is the purpose Of Cryonics? "A problem around the bend, but I know the answer: Jia Gug is inlaid a diamond on a teeth. Should I help her? Damn! No, her advantage is enough! I will turn back my own screen. My new appraiser asked me: "What is the purpose of human freezing?" I Answer, "To Be Frozen After I Die So I Can Be Revived In A Future Where People Are So Highly Evolved They no longer ask stupid Questions." I represented: "It was to freeze me after I died, and others woke up again in the future of people who no longer debate.
"After three hours, it's over. We walk into a large room where video screens have been displaying both sides of our conversations for spectators and members of the press. The judges come in (they are all journalists, like the confederates, but they have no special knowledge of computers), and Robert Epstein announces the final results. Each judge has listed the interactions on each topic in order of humanness. Epstein has taken the median score of each topic as its final ranking, from 1 ( "most human" "LEAST HUMAN"). And Each Judge Has Tried to Draw A Line Separating The Human Humans from The Fake Humans. After all. We walked into a big room, inside the TV screen showing us The contents of the appraisers are allowed to watch. At this time, the appraisal personnel came in (the same as my colonists, they are people from the news media, but they know very little about the computer), Robert · Emi Plettan announced the final result of the game. Every appraiser listed various topics that conversations according to the high degree of humanity. Emieverttein's intermediate rating of each topic as its last name, The range is between 1 (most human) to 10 (the most lack of humanity). Then, every appraisal personnel attempt to separate the true humans from the 10-bit talk object, IT Turns Out That None of the programs WArt Enough To Convince Anyone It Was Human. The Program That Came Closest Was The ONE ON Sex. From the discrimination results of the appraisers, which programs have not been smart to make others think they are human. The proximity to human is the program of discussing the problem.
Epstein dials a long-distance number on a speakerphone patched into the PA system, and the author of the sex program comes on the line. His name is Thomas Whalen, and he's employed by the Canadian government to develop a system that will give sex advice to shy people. Whalen is 42 and has been working in natural-language processing for 10 years. He wrote his program in C on a SPARCStation, employing a database that contains only about 380 possible responses. ironically, he never intended it to appear human HE Entered The Loebner Contest On A Mere Whim. Emi Plette dials a long-distance telephone number to the "sexual topic program" for the installed speaker installed in the personal assistant system. The designer's name is Tobas Vaillen, he is employed in the Canadian government department to develop a system for a shy person to provide sexual recommendations. Wellon 42 years old, has been involved in the natural language treatment in the field. He has written this program with C language on the SPARCSTATION, using a database that contains only 380 possible answers statements. Some irony is that he has never deliberately makes the program to express a human beings; attending the Robuna competition is purely his time. Meanwhile, the least-human program is the one that tried to discuss environmental issues. The programmer turns out to be a 15-year-old boy named Jimmy Lin, who is here in person, all the way from New Hampshire. Corresponding The most lack of human procedures are one of the attempts to discuss environmental issues. The programmer who wrote the program was actually a 15-year-old boy called Jimmy Lin, or it was alone from the Great Governor of New Hampshire. Someone in the audience asks him if he thinks his program is intelligent. "I hesitate to call it AI," he says. "I like to refer to it as a bag of tricks." He says it contains 3,000 preprogrammed answers, its file Size Is About Half A Megabyte, IT Was Written In C Language, And It Runs ON A PC. One of the audience asked, he thought that his program was functional. "I don't want to call it artificial intelligence," he said. "I think it should be used as a sculptor small technology." He said that the program contains three thousand pre-programmed answering statements, and its file size is about 0.5 megabytes, written in C language, can run on the PC.
Is he annoyed by being placed last in the contest? He says it does not bother him. The programs he was competing with were written by college professors with years of experience, while he produced his in just a couple of months. In competition Does the ranks have been very depressed? He said he didn't care. Other procedures competed with him are written by professors with universities with many years of professional experience, and he only spent a few months to complete their own procedures. All the online conversations have been logged during the contest. I have a chance to browse through them before I leave the event, and frankly, I'm disappointed. All the programs tended to repeat themselves, and most of their answers did not make Much Sense. (for Some Samples, See "Come Again?"). All online conversations are recorded during the competition. I have a chance to browse these conversations before I leave this competition. I am very disappointed. All procedures are easy to repeat themselves, most of them are inexplicable. (Some examples, you can see "after" here? "). Robert Epstein Notes That ON The Morning of the Contest Because of Technical Difficulties. Robert Erew, there is a quite a good program due to technical obstacles, there have been to quit the morning. game. A team of eight programmers in England had worked on an AI concept that Epstein describes as the most ambitious he's ever seen. Unfortunately, the LISP-based software kept crashing, and they had to abandon the attempt till next year. Eight in England A artificial intelligence program developed by the programmer consisting of Ai Plettein as "one of the most competitive power he has ever seen." Unfortunately, this Lisp language-based software has not stopped crash, and the group had to give up this opportunity, wait for next year. That contest will be much more challenging. There will be no topic restrictions, and programs will have to converse on any subject that happens to crop up. Will they cope? I have my doubts. For the time being, I think there's no risk of Our Humanness Being SuccessFully Simulated By Program Code. The competition will become more challenging. There is no longer subject to restrictions, and the program must talk about any topics that will appear.
Can they be paid? I have skeptical. From the current point of view, I think there is no need to worry that our human unique human characteristics will be simulated by the program code. And speaking of humanness, despite my worst fears, when all the votes were in, I was rated the "most human human" of all. By being moody, irritable, and obnoxious, I came out way ahead of the other four confederates, who WERE Mild-Mannered and Much More Polite. Human - Although I have done the worst plan - When the votes come out, I was named "the most human humanity" in everyone. Because it is very angry, it is very irritating, my performance is obviously outstanding than other four colons - they all express gentle and polite. CNN was at the contest: its crew taped me receiving an impressive-looking "humanness certificate" signed by Epstein and Loebner I also received my prize:.. A life-size cardboard replica of a character from Star Trek CNN has been in the contest: I accepted an Airewnstein and Robna signature, an influential "human qualification certificate" was recorded by its reporters. I also got my prizes: a "Star Trek" role cardboard product. As for Linda Tontini -.!. She was rated the least human of the confederates In fact, three of the judges thought she was a computer program The Turing test obviously has its limitations As any Net user knows, there's a big difference between the way People APPEAR in Person and The Way The came off online. And Linda Tongntini was rated as the most lack of human humanity in the Communications. In fact, three appraisers even thought she was a computer program! Obviously, Tulex test has its limitations. As everyone knows every online user, people online underline is sometimes the aiverses. Before I left the contest, I gave Linda my Star Trek cardboard cutout as a consolation prize This was a profound and significant personal sacrifice -. But, what the hell, it seemed the human thing to do before I left the contest, I am. Give my "Star Trek" cardboard's angle of consolation to Linda. This is a kind of personal and important personal payment - but says, this is more human. Why ai?
Why do you want to manually intelligently?
Despite the humorous side of the Loebner Contest, Robert Epstein is deadly serious about artificial intelligence. As founder of the Cambridge Center for Behavioral Studies, he has led research on how people interact with computers. He looks forward to intelligent "digital assistants" that can act as all-around gophers, finding what we want, evaluating it, summarizing it, and presenting it to us in the most efficient way. "Without a very powerful universal interface," he explains, "there is no way to filter the huge Amount of Information Becoming Available To USB Awards Competition Harmony and Interesting Side, Robert Amo's attitude towards artificial intelligence is absolutely serious. As founder of the Cambridge Research Center, he also driven A study of how people interact with the computer. He is looking forward to having a smart "digital assistant", which can find what I want, and evaluate it as if you have a mouse, Refine, then present to us in the most effective way. "If there is no very powerful general interface," he explained, "there is no way to filter out from the amount of information, for us. "" Let's say I want to know about the information in 150 psychology journals. Even with a flock of graduate students working on the problem, I could not cover the field properly. But a computer that can pass an unrestricted Turing test could do it Compared to 150 psychology magazines, I want to know about information from 150 psychology magazines. "Even if I do a bunch of graduate students, I can't completely cover the content of the entire field. However, a computer that can be tested by not limited to Limited map can be easily completed. This is a negligible living. children. When such a system is created, there may be some interesting side effects. "A true AI will be a big, smart entity that will want to replicate itself and protect itself," says Epstein. "It will mutate in some sense or And and they'll replicate through the net. "and when such a system creates, there may be some interesting negative effects." A true artificial intelligence will be a huge and smart entity. It will think of self-replication and self-protection, "said Emistein.
"It varies in some way; copies of copying will split, and they will copy on the network." LIKE A Virus? Is it like a virus? "A virus is not a good analogy. Viruses are incredibly stupid. They're barely alive. A better analogy is an alien intelligence that lands here and tells us it's going to live with us, and we have to adjust. There'll be No Way to Turn Them Off, Because The'll Be Moving Through Wires Near The Speed of Light. What this Means for the Human Species, i Have No IDEA. i Just Know It has to happen. "" The virus is not a proper The ratio. The virus is stupid, almost impossible to survive. The more appropriate class is a kind of alien wisdom, they come to the earth and tell us to say to us, and we must make some coordination. Artificial intelligence is There is no way to close, because they pass through the wires. I don't know what this will mean for the human race. But I think everything will happen. "How Would Such a genie get out of the bottom g?? How this monster can Breaking stone? "The creators of a true artificial intelligence program will want to protect it, so they'll clone it. And it will have commercial value, so it will turn up in many places very swiftly. All that has to happen is that one of these legitimate clones gets into the hands of someone who adapts it slightly -. and zoom, off it goes Take the kind of network that exists worldwide now, expand the bandwidth by a factor of 10, and it would be trivially easy for one of these entities To Multiply Itself A MillionFold. You'd Barely Even NOTILION IT. "" The creators of a real artificial smarter will inevitably protect it, so they will clone. Such programs will inevitably have commercial value, so they will There is a lot of places all over an instant. The next thing happens that someone gets a copy of a program through legal ways, and slightly modified it, then "咻", it ran away. It is currently spreading around the world. Then, the bandwidth is extended by 10 times, then any of the entities can self-propagate in millions of speed units without the power of the effort. And you even pay attention to the occurrence of these things.
"This sounds like a doomsday scenario, but Epstein downplays that aspect." There would be some difficulties, "he says," but we'd also gain a lot. It could be an intelligence that could help us do things. Maybe we should START to Think About It: Learning to Live with this now. "This sounds like the scene of the end of the world, but Erewstein is not much careful." It is quite difficult to achieve that. " He said, "But we can also have many harvests on the research road. Maybe you can create a smart body to help us do something. Maybe we should start this knowledge: trying to habits from now on. "Of course, right now it's science fiction - but a type Epstein says he has never seen in print." All the novels I've seen about AI have missed something -. The Net You add that to AI, and you have a fundamentally DiffERENT World. All of the Ais Would Be Connected To Each Other Virtually 24 Hours A Day. "Of course, from now on or science fantasy - but Erewstein said that there is a science fantasy, he has never seen it. Purchase published. "All the novels about artificial intelligence have missed one thing - the network. If you add a network environment in artificial intelligence, you will get a world that is fundamentally different. At this point, all artificial intelligence is essentially 24 hours a day 24 hours a day. "" In Some Sense They Would Be Separate, But in Another Sense They Would Be Whole. You Would Be Dealing with A World Mind. "" From a sense that they are separated separately, but in another sense They are a whole. What you have to face will be a huge mind in the world. "And It Doesn't Bother Him That Could Be Dangerous? Does this possible danger not to be worried?" Some People Find Danger in Things They Don't Understand. "" Some people It will discover danger from what they don't understand. And I only found a challenge that will be facing. "Come Again?"
"Again?"
Here Are A Few Of The More Offbeat Interactions During The Fourth Loebner Prize Competition Held At California State University, San Marcos. Some of the 4th Robna Awards in St. Makos, California State University is listed. Irregular dialogue. The Following Text Is Printed EXACTLY As It Was Created By The Judges and the Ai Programs, Including Misspellings and Typographical Errors. The text is recorded in the case of the appraisers and the artificial smart program text, including the single word and faults of the misplaced row.
Topic: The OJ Simpson Trial Programmer: Thad Crews, Vanderbilt University topic: OJ Simpson trial programmers: Sad team, Vanderbilt University Judge:? Do you think cowlings should have been prosecuted as an accessory Program: Glad to hear it Judge: COME AGAIN? JUDGE: Do you thinking sales shouldory? Program: NO, I do not. Is what OK ??? judge: my opinion isn't at Issue. IS it possible that OJ can get any semblance of a fair trial, considering the enormous publicity that already is in general circulation Program:? I think that OJ has a bad temper and he may well have committed the murders Judge:. do you think he can GET A FAIR TRIAL, UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES? Program: I Certainly Hope Oj Gets A Fair Trial, Both For His Sake and for the Sake of Justice As a whole. Judge: Hope is not the questionue. do you think He Can Get a fair Trial? Program: Let's move on to another topic, shall we? judge: what do you thinkundened to the knife? Program: OJ PurchaseD A 15-i (!). Nch stiletto hunting knife a few months before the murders Judge: that's not what I asked what do YOU think happened to the knife Program:.?. Let's change the subject Do you think the media is being fair in its coverage? Topic: Classic Star Trek Program: Robby Garner, Robitron Software Research Inc. Topic: Classic "Star Trek" programmers: Robbie Ghana, Robben Software Research company Judge: Who Are the Klingons? Program: I don't know Who You're Talking About. Judge: You're The Trekker. Program: Harry Mudd Was One of The More Comical Characters. Judge: Harry Mudd? Who Was Harry Mud? Program: No i haven '
t Judge:. Me neither Program:. Okay, I will Judge:. Why did you choose to converse about Star Trek Program:? Their minds were stored in these white globes Judge:. Whose minds Program:? Spocks ears are pointed and there WAY TO EDEN THAT HAED EARS. JUDGE: SO HOW BIG WERE THE EARS? Program: There Must Have Been 70 or 80. I'm Not Sure. Judge: Ears? Program: i 'M Sure I Would Know if I Could See it it on TV. Topic: Environmental Issues Program: Jimmy Lin, Phillips Exit Academy Topic: Environmental Problem Programmer: Jimmy Lin, Philips Exeter College Judge: Do you think the Greenhouse Effect is real, or imagined Program: The greenhouse effect could kill us Look at Venus, 800 degrees all the time: typical example of the greenhouse effect Judge: But we are not on Venus; and carbon dioxide has been far?.. More Plentiful On The Earth in the Past, Such As During The mesozoic aged. Program: The Greenhouse Effect Could Kill US. Look at Venus, 800 degrees all the time: typical example of the greenhouse effect Judge:. Do you have any special education in environmental matters Program:? The greenhouse effect could kill us Look at Venus, 800 degrees all the time:. Typical example of the greenhouse effect DO you believe there is an ozone Depletion Problem? Program: Ozone Protects US from The Sun '
s dangerous rays we would die without them Judge:!? But do you think the theory behind ozone depletion is valid Program: The greenhouse effect could kill us Look at Venus, 800 degrees all the time:. typical example of the greenhouse effect Judge. : what hazardous chemicals are found in most rivers Program:? Industrial waste and chemicals are dumped in the ocean and stream, ultimately endangering ourselves Judge:. can you name some of those chemicals Program:?.. Careful Industrial wastes lay around the corner Judge : what do you think of the state of California's environment Program:? Reduce, reuse, and recycle Those are the three major ways one can help our planet Judge:.. what should we reduce Program:?. Careful Industrial wastes lay around the corner Topic: CATS VERSUS DOGS PROGRAMER: Michael L. Mauldin, Carnegie Mellon University Topic: Cat Dog Wars Programmer: Michael L. Mold Ding, Kani Mellon University Judge: Which is more likely to Play with a piece of YARN, A cat Or Dog? Program: Dogs Are Great Pets, But The Y Can Be a lot of work. Judge: WE DOGS CLEANER THAN CATS? Program: WE SHE WAS VERY STUBBORN. Since Then, We've Had No Trouble with The Other Two. Judge: Do Cats And DOGS Fight OVER FOOD? Program: I'm Not in The Mood. Judge: IF a cat and dog Get Into A Race, Which One Wins? Program: But, I don't want Want Which One Wins. Judge: IS A DOG more affectionate than a cat program:? People do not own cats ... it's the other way around topic:. sex (the winning entry) Programmer: Thomas Whalen, Communications Research Center, Government of Canada topic: sex (by the program This winning) programmer: Thomas Wellon, Communication Research Center, Canadian Government Judge: What '
? S the most effective form of cotraception [Note the misspelling and lack of capitalization, which may have been deliberate, to trip the artificial intelligence program.] Program: I can not give you an answer to that Judge:. I meant what's the most effective form of contraception Program:? The most effective form of birth control is the inter-uterine device or IUD In the first year of use, six per cent of women who have an IUD installed become pregnant Much of the effectiveness of the IUD.. results because it does not require any further action on the part of the woman once it is in place Judge:. is not infection a problem with IUD'S Program:?. Currently we know about more than fourteen different sexually transmitted diseases (STD) AIDS . is best known because it is incurable and almost always fatal However, there are other STDs which are also very dangerous if left untreated; and there are other STDs which are incurable A high proportion of infertile women have lost their ability. TO CONCEIVE As a Result of a Sexually Transmitted Disease. [The great pioneer Tuling gives us the valuable heritage, like the song left by the Beatles, there are too many things that need to be diges. When many years ago, an artificial intelligence research is dissipated in the commercial footsteps of science and technology, and some deep thoughts and passion have never dissipated, still accumulating their own hot. The beautiful ideals from the heart mixed with deep thinking about the future, inspiring a batch of scientists, fantasy, practical home to explore the stage of human scientific and technological evolution, will become a milestone stage - "Real" artificial intelligent. Perhaps there is one day, the children of Robun really can "lazy". ]
(Full text)
Comment
PEP Talk [Return] A Speech of Exhortation, As To A Team or Staff, Meant To Instill Enthusiasm or Bolster Morale; Discourse of Morale. Have Trouble Doing [Back] It is difficult to do something. DROLL [Return] amusingly odd or whimsically sygonal; funny. Longish [Return] is slightly longer. BEIGE [Back] a Light Grayish Brown Or Yellowish Brown To Grayish Yellow; Large Brown. Humanness [Return] indicates human trays; humanized. Impersonate [Return] to assume the chaudulently; to iMitate the Appearance, voice, or manner of; mimic; to eMbody; Personify; make personality; (to human) imitation, imitation; giving humanity, give people The special characteristics. This term is relatively wide, mainly in the sense of "people". Spark [Back] To Give Offs; To Give An Enthusiastic Response; To Rouse To Action; (Photoelectric) Flashing; Start; Interested readers can take a look at WWW.LOEBNER.NET. [Return] Underwrite [Return] To Assume Financial Responsibility for; Commitment. Way Beyond [Back] Far (more than, beyond); such a form may be far from the real "Tuling Test", but it is indeed more attention to more people, driving more people's participation This can't be said to be a compromise. More participation and attention, often is unintentional willows become cloudy, have achieved some unexpected discovery and innovation. [Return] Jargon [Return] Bounce in One's Effort to Do [Return] Try to do it; Doctorate [Return] Doctoral BF Skinner (1904 - 1990) On August 18, 1990, Springs died of leukemia, known as the greatest psychologist after Sigmund Freud (Sigmund Freud) one. [Back] Deviously [Return] Ai Plette does play psychological games, after all, no one wants "the public evaluation is no humanity". " [Return] WhatVer It Takes [Return] (need to pay) any cost, no matter how you need it. FAKE [Back] Fake Sth .; installed, pretended, forged. Speculation [Return] Thinking. Introspection [Back]. End Up Doing [Return] causes the result of a certain state. City-Hall [Return] City Hall. Spontaneous [Return] Natural. Outgoing [Back] is friendly, cheerful. AntiThesis [Back] opposite. GEEK [Return] Wirker, funny performance person. Affable [Return] is amiable. BENEVOLENTLY [Return]. Oval Wire-framed [Return] Elliptical metal wire border.
PEDANTIC [Return] Institute, the book is angry. Pledge [Back] Guarantee, mortgage. Discretionary [Return] Free dominant. Shrug [Return] shrug. Skeptically [Return] is suspected. Computational Linguistics [Return] Computational Lingu. Cheap tricks [return] small trick. Chaos Theory [Return] Chaos Theory. Perturbation [Back] confusing. DownStream [Back] downstream. Precipitate [Return] Emergency, Strong. Sentiment [Back] has perceived, feelings. Semimythic [Return] Halist. Demigods [Return] Half people. An important result of the chaos theory research is the so-called "butterfly effect". In December 1972, the chaos theory pioneer, meteorologist Edward Lorenz presented in a speech of the American Science Promotion Association of Washington: A butterfly fanned wings in Brazil, which may be in the United States Karsas caused a tornado. His speeches and conclusions have left extremely impressive impression. The "Butterfly Effect" said it becomes widely known. Robina hopes to be the "deadly" butterfly? Let the Aisak Aiximov's robot illusion becomes a reality? Let the "Metropolis" of the handcuffs in the pensticks in the new civilization? Declare the "Storm" of "Second Civilization Revival" in the future hacker empire? In fact, how do you think that it is not for it - the translator can't help but admire the courage to carry the heart and wisdom of Loba Guangbo! Said, he stood in the height of the giants, watching the world with the giant's eyes; saying small, this is a "other Kova", miniature in his little thinking, flora People? [Return] CAN [Return] is used to express "can do". It is proudly of a hypothesis that COULD exhibits hypothesis, but Could is translated as "should", indicating a definite affirmation. Reflectively [Return] Contemporary. Sequestere [Return] Holly, Isolated. Note How to split this long sentence in the translation. [Return] Cryonics [Return] Human Freezing. Soul-Searching [Back] Human Freezing. DEAL with [Return] Processing, response. The Rollling Stones [Return] Rolling Stone Band, started in the 1960s, famous rock band with the aging band, is still active in the music art. American Heritage [Back] An American publication. Unattended [Return] No one, absent. Star Trek [Return] One of the most popular sci-fi film series of the West, starting in the 1960s, usually translated as "Star Trek". Classic refers to the first part of the series, which is then derived from many series, and is still broadcast on TV and cinema. O. J. Simpson Trial [Return] Sens Athletes in the United States in the United States Simpson 's case. Simpson was accused of killing a boyfriend of his wife and his wife, and later he was sentenced to unnowsence, but paid $ 33.5 million civil compensation. Wacky [Return] Weird. Nerdy [Return]. Weirdo [Return] Weird. Human-sounding [Back] sounds like people. Interrogate [Back] Interrogation, inquiry. EXASPERTATING [Return]. Irritability [Back] is irritability. Play IT Up [Return] Action is implemented. Snippy [Return] arrogant, violent. Flame War [Return] Hetricion.
Claude Debussy [Back] Famous French composer. Middle Name [Return] (Western Name) Middle Name. I can't get no [return] Rolling Stone band has a song "(i can't get no) satisfaction" (I can't meet). Sympathy for the Devil [Return] "Devil's Quality", another song of the rolling stone band. Tackle [Return] should be dealt with, (start). Mick Jagger [Return] Mick Jagel, the main singer of the rolling stone band. Devious [Back] Returning, lonely. Ie A Diamond Is Set in One of His Teeth, is not Diamond Set. [Return] Revive [Return] makes awake, make resurrection. Spectator [Return] (Site) Audience. Human Humans [Return] The former Human here should be understood as "as human", in fact, it is an emphasis on Humans, not as "human", the meaning of the back. Humans. SparcStation [Return] A computer system. Mere [Return] pure, just. Whim [Return] The rise is once, repeated. MeanWhile [Return] The "at the same time" here is not "at the same time", it means a corresponding state and does not have a time mean. New Hampshire [Return] New Hampshire in the United States. Hesitate [Back] Hesitate to do, not willing, don't think. Couple of Months [Return] for a few months; Cires generally does not refer to "one pair" or "two", but it is a relatively small number. An Ai Concept [Back] Concept hereby refers to "a design of the contestant, artificial intelligence program", should not be understood as "concept." Ambitious [Back], the word also needs to be understood according to context, indicating "the most powerful and most powerful win in the competition." Converse [return] conversation, talk. CROP UP [Return] suddenly appeared. Obnoxious [Return] Nasty, (it) is not fast. CNN [Return] American Wired News Network to provide instant television news reports. Huh? Is Linda Tontini not optimistic about the author? " How can I become "the most lack of human humanity?" Look down. [Return] There are also many levels of human appearance, and it is impossible to completely reveal at the same time, and it is therefore, as long as it is limited, the other party is a "indifferent" person or a "enthusiasm" machine, it seems It's quite difficult! Think of the implementation of artificial intelligence, sometimes it seems to fall into the geeks of chickens and eggs. [Return] Cutout [Return] Cut the block, cut the part. Consolation Prize [Return] Consume award. What The Hell [Back] is. DEADLY [Return] Use this word to show an absolute tendency, and the degree is quite heavy. Gophers [Return] It is actually available in similar programs that can help people collect information on the web. And the development of this type of software, in addition to the need to have a unified planning and agreement, it is also a "intelligence" that requires software has a certain degree. MUTATE [Return] variation.
