An obvious advantage in Chinese is that the thinking is broad, in mathematics due to single sound pronunciation, the number of reactions to the numbers is faster, but in logical thinking, the pinyin is better, but from the trend of human civilization development, Chinese explains Chinese, due to free combination of new concepts and new ideas, can accommodate information and knowledge explosions, will undoubtedly develop into human common languages, and use this language to exchange ideas more convenient, more colorful, of course In the paper and computer language is Chinese and pinyin text, Chinese great is compatible, you look at the Chinese and Arabic Digital and Western Pinyin text mix, but in English paper To a Chinese character, China's physics experts can use his chemical basic knowledge in the middle school's chemical fundamental knowledge. Accordingly, and the experts in different industries in the United States have to exchange their academic achievements, they are the piano, with this advantage. Chinese is eligible to become a Chinese language, and some scholars in our country have to pin up Chinese. Is this not a good job? Our Chinese people are also qualified to accuse the so-called civilized Westerners who are manufacturing environmental pollution, destroying forests and grassland, which is them, because of a book in printing the same content, Western language is more than 2 times the paper, all People who use Western languages are more than 5 times more than people using Chinese. According to a simple factor level, it is necessary to waste more than 10-20 times, and the industrial wastewater is more than 20 times, and the language is superior. There is no qualification for Westerners to say three four words in Chinese. They all know Chinese text from the five working languages of the United Nations, because Chinese text is the thinnest. There is such a place in my heart; thinking that Chinese is going to be eliminated by English sooner or later. I remember once, probably Hu Siibi simply said it clearly. A few days ago, "Century Lecture Hall", a scholar Li Rui also believes that the result of globalization is to let English rule the world. Only by 次 山 大 大 大 时 时 时 时.. 山 山 山 山 山 山 山 山 英 英 英 英 英 英 英 英 英 英However, he proposed a problem; since Chinese use 'sound' makes Chinese thinking than English, then because there are many Mandarin in Cantonese, is it a faster than Mandarin? My answer is that although Cantonese is more than Mandarin, Cantonese has two shortcomings, first, its text plan is not good, the text is poor, and the sound of the closed sound festival exists. Second, its sound utilization is not high, there are 21 accents, 35 rhymes and four in Mandarin, and the results of the multiplication are 2900 sounds, but can be utilized to be 2500, and they are truly used in Mandarin. Only 1200. Cantonese has nine, even if it is as much as Mandarin, then the sound it actually uses should be more than two times, but the actual sound actually used in Cantonese is only 1,500, with Mandarin Almost, and its utilization is almost doubled than Mandarin. Small utilization, it means difficult to learn. Because of the same kind of sound mother or rhyme, each time the use is actually a process of practice, and the use of high-utilization is easy to remember, it is easy to master. It can also be seen in daily life, and all common language elements, including sounds, rhyme, Chinese characters, and words, the more often used, the more often used. The quality of the language is actually dependent on two aspects. First, is it possible to master it with a small memory, second, is it possible to master more knowledge than others in the year? In terms of one sentence, it should be: The best language is not known, but the knowledge you have learned is the most language, or the language of less and know more.
English is different from Mandarin, in the international audio symbol, English has 20 yuan and 20 supplements, so the voice of English will not exceed 20 × 20 = 400; in turn, not in these four hundred sounds Any sound is not recognized by English, or is considered incorrect pronunciation; what is not "syllable" here. It will be seen in comparison that the pronunciation of Chinese is three times that of English, and the ratio of the two is much greater than the ratio of Cantonese and Mandarin. Let's talk about it, the more sound types, the faster your thinking speed. This problem, last year I discussed a month in the "Peking University Chinese" forum to make everyone clear, here I want to try it simpler. Suppose there is a person who is only two kinds of sounds, specifically, he will send A and B. According to the theory of the computer, we know that he can still express the whole world with these two symbols. Suppose, only 400 things in the world need to express, then a British can use every pronunciation to express one of 400 things, but only people who will send two sounds, sometimes they have to use nine pronunciations. To express one of 400 things, because the nine times is greater than 400. For example, the British uses "I" represent "I" and only two people will use Abbabba to represent "I" concept. Each of the average person needs to consume a quarter second. Compared with both, only two people will express them slowly, but also effort. When expressing the concept of "I", the British uses a quarter of seconds, and only two sounds will use two quarters. If two people live in such a proportion of life, all the information enjoyed in their lives will be its flexibility 9: 1. In the actual situation, the most obvious is the comparison of Japanese and Chinese. We know that Japanese uses 100 different voices, and Chinese uses 1200 kinds of sounds, so many Chinese characters will make Japanese people must use two or three. The sound is expressed. We assume that all the words in Japanese use two sounds to express, then it is not to say that the information you can enjoy in the Japanese is just half of the Chinese? I have been thinking that this is not related to the history of Japan has never had a great thinker. We know that thinking is actually a process of saying, if you express it, then, the speed of thinking should also follow it. Specific examples are Zhao Yuan Ren Ren, who has been reciting in English and Chinese, and Chinese uses 30 seconds, while English is used in English. Therefore, if two people recite in English and Chinese, when they arrived in 30 seconds, Chinese users must think of 1998, and English users must not be here, maybe, he thinks only Seven 749. This demonstrates how many languages that use pronunciation are rapid than language thinking than using pronunciation. This is proven by many scholars in the country and inside and outside. As for the speed of thinking, it is a lot of scholars who represent smart. My evidence is to explain a "mystery" in history: Why is ancient Greeks smarter than others? Because Greece's culture comes from the ancient Philliki, we know that the Phoenik has invented human pinyin letters, as a result, this is a big progress, thinking speed, it is a big reverse. Because, in order to screen the sound elements that are easy to distinguish, the Phoenik has only used 22 supplements, so that its expression is of course slower than now, and the Greeks use the vowel, we know the vowels and consonants. After the combination, the type of sound is equal to a few times. In fact, there is a vowel in the Phoenik's voice, otherwise they can't make it.
The so-called 22 consonant is that they only recognize that these 22 consonants are information, which is, MA, ME, MU, MAI, MUO in their ears with a m without any difference like Me's four tones There is no difference in the British. Since the sudden increase in sound is made, the Greeks' thinking is flying, causing later phenomena. In the forum, someone who had asked Chinese voice is still more in English, why no UK is advanced. My answer is that when the type of sound is suddenly increased, there is a new idea. In contrast, when the voice is reduced, the thoughts tend to be conservative, and after the Yuan Dynasty, the Chinese voice lost a "into" sound, China Weakening is happiering from then. Finally, when discussing Ni Anders, people also found that there were fewer types of sounds that were hidden by history. The reason why I think Chinese must defeat English is not here, the key is to solve the problem of knowledge explosion faced by human beings. We know that the current English words include a variety of biological names and new terms that have exceeded millions of patent invention. If you have some ingredients that can be derived and associated in English; such as before, suffix and compound words, it needs There are also one million basic words of memory. All these words can be expressed in Chinese. The fundamental reason is not enough to pronunciation. For example, Pork, represents pork in English, which does not have any relationship with pig Pig, meat, meat, only represents a single consortium, if pork pork, mutton Mutton, beef, lard, sheep oil Suet and cattle If the oil Talon is placed together, it will find that all the informations in English are a new symbol that is unrelated with any of the decomposition words, but they constitute the main body of English vocabulary, millions of English. The word is like this. Its root cause is because if Pork is changed to Pig and Meat, then you want to pronounce four times and Pork just pronounced twice; so the word in the group saves pronunciation but to increase memory, and split Words, no memory, but increases the number of pronunciations. Imagine, a butcher, every day, the word "pork" is used up to thousands, using two pronunciation words to pronounce two thousand pronunciations than using four pronunciations, why not? But when you encounter uncommon words, English is just like Chinese, using decomposition words, such as donkey meat to express it. Because of the unopened words, even if the symbolic form is set, others can't remember. Chinese can make the function of the English Chinese affiliate vocabulary, which makes the words that need memories have been greatly reduced; not only, it can also make the vocabulary in people's minds to clarify. The birth of Darwinism is the basis of establishing a double law in Linnai, which makes various impressions from the original plane in the brain into stereo. For example, before Linner, people gave all the creatures, as a result, because there are too many types, the same organism may have two names, while the additional organisms may have no name. Lin N is classified all the biodiversity and gives a class name, then put a word below the class name, the two form a double name. This is not only clear, but also greatly reduces the symbols that need memory; such as 10,000 names, now divide one hundred classes, and divide them into one hundred, we need to remember only one hundred classes. Name and one hundred names, two hundred, not the original 10,000. As the problem of knowledge explosion is gradually deteriorating, human beings must also modify other terms, and the only way to be reform is based on the structure of Chinese. The reason is or is the number of pronunciations.
This phenomenon is the first of Germany's Libniz to experience, and he thinks Chinese is a group-based language that is self-biaris. However, he did not see the true characteristics of the sound, but defined Chinese characters due to the number of Chinese characters, the world's most advanced text. I think, if he sees the world of knowledge explosion today, he will definitely ask all the countries in the world to abolish pinyin text and use Chinese characters. Finally, talk about how many words or symbols can be remembered in the life of people. The Chinese characters used by the Chinese are usually three to four thousand, while Shakespeare's English is only 30,000 words, he can all master. However, to the Churchill era, his single word is still 30,000, but the English has already had nearly 100,000 words. Therefore, I think that Shakespeare's skills use English words is that the originates cannot be reached. I used to ask the language of many English higher education in the Internet. I have to learn how many words in learning English, but their answer is always vague, or something else. Later, I found in some articles that I can't avoid this problem, the language of linguists for English words is: an educated English user should master five to 250,000 words, not only the gap is very large, but also, This standard is measured, Shakespeare and Churchill should be illiterate, at least people who have never been educated. I think this is any kind of people who recommend English. As long as they can escape others asking this question, other aspects ... My point of view has been discussed in Peking University Chinese. However, you can see that there are still many people who don't know, they all think that they are inferior people and inferior cultures. Therefore, there are still many things to do with the confidence of Chinese people. In fact, as long as everyone can restore confidence, the Chinese should lead to the world in many things. But we love to diamond tip, always when the foreigner sets a set of standards, we are desperately chased. Why, we can't set up a standard, and let them change the taste? I remember that a few years ago, Western countries have a problem that I like to say hand, at that time, I also had a problem - like it. The United States has a Cox report, which has a large number of contrasts, which means that the Chinese cannot pass three or forty nuclear inspections, and the same achievements in the United States. The only explanation is China's American technology. Some people also call this incident as the Lee Witry. At that time, I sent an electronic letter to all Senators in the United States. The content is to say that if they want to completely investigate the matter, another survey group should be established, studying the difference between Chinese and English in thinking. Only in this way can we figure out why China's three or forty nuclear tests have different progress in the development of more than a thousand nuclear tests in the United States. At the back of the letter, I attached a calculation of the comparison of two languages. Later, I received a lot of trusts and asked me to tell them that my real address will continue to consider. ... I also understand that there will be no such US Senator will propose any relevant motion, because any relevant motion proposed, itself is a variety of Chinese in Chinese. No US is willing to debate it. The truth is very obvious. If the debate, it will inevitably involve many problems in voice and linguistics, and each problem is their scar. At present, the United States has always asked China to reduce the RMB exchange rate, but the attitude still has no exception, so this theory is not suitable. Once they exceed rationality, then they are very easy to teach linguistics. In other words, it is: Due to the narrow scope of English, it is impossible to consider problems from a longer long-term interest.
However, I still don't dare to say this, at least I dare not say to Americans. Because I am a studitor, I have a little grasp, but I have encountered an economic problem, I have no bottom in my heart. Similar things are to find a Chinese language BBS for debate. Everyone knows that the Chinese language is actually a language that is designed to change the English change, and of course, does not know how to use "tone". My problem is that English words have far exceed the common people's memory limits, is there any way to make up for this defect? At that time, someone answered me said that the use of derived structures in the Chinese language is more obvious than English. However, when I explained the sound types in Chinese, and "tone" utilization method, no one has spoke. There is also a "English Movement", "Just English Movement", English, has been awarded to the world. I would like to know what my opinion is. I told them that you will actually push American culture to the abyss and destroy American culture. Save your method only to reselect a language with "tone". For those who have not learned Chinese, they generally don't know what is "tone", so I have to explain them to them with the sound of singing; any English "syllable" can be followed by at least eight different The sound, this and "tone" role is similar. The above mentioned is actually the soil of the Americans, there is no need, I will not touch, affect unity. Moreover, as China's national strength increases, we can say less and fewer, because more, give people excuses to threaten them. Talking about the pros and disadvantages of Chinese and English to talk about the pros and indices of Chinese and English, first think of the difference between "expressing text" and "phonetic text". The previous evolution of the Chinese characters is no longer a pure expression. There is a large number of sound words. With the continuous development of civilization, the concepts of civilization should have increased, and the expressions require Chinese characters to have a large number of character sets, but modern Chinese does not have to increase characters to express new concepts, but create new words, plus The standardization of Chinese character Chinese, has basically reached the purpose of reducing the number of words. In contrast to the Chinese characters, English name "Physical Word" is actually really tangible; more serious problems in English is how to solve the contradiction between the English written spelling form and the pronunciation. Due to the promotion of printing and education in the literary revival, the form of writing of English is gradually unified, forming a normative form, and these specifications are further fixed by printing. But at the same time, English speech has changed greatly. For example, GNASH (bite) and GNAT (small insect), G is not pronunciation, Knight (Knight) and KNOW (Know), K is not pronounced, and in Chinese ancient English, these letters must pronounce. Another example, the R (eg, ARM) and the words before the consonant letters and the words are non-pronunciation, the E (such as live) is not pronounced, and in the middle of the ancient English, they are pronounced. This situation makes a large contradiction between the written form of the specification with the actual pronunciation. This is also a difficult point encountered when Chinese learning English: Learn a "verbal text" If you don't check the dictionary, don't look at the international phonetic symbol, you don't necessarily pronounce, is it funny? In the 18th century, the UK emphasized the standardization of language and requested language to be accurate and powerful.
In 1755, Johnson (Samuel Johnson) wrote the first English dictionary and fixed the spelling of English words. In this way, the English language can be used as a specification according to the dictionary. This is very similar to the writing of Xiaoyan's writing when China Qin Dynasty is not capable of preventing changes in Chinese characters. This puts forward the second question: the so-called pinyin text has a big problem, that is, many Pinyin text, due to the continuous change of the depolarous in thousands of years, its written text and pronunciation tend to go. Like French, its written language is expressed or pronunciation before five hundred years, and the vowel of the non-pronunciation is all, like hommes read as um, AiMent reads as EM. In fact, the current written English, French, has already had a large "expressive text". Historical Chinese characters as ideographs, text and voice have no direct relationship, no matter which language or dialect is read, the meaning does not change. This is a reason why Chinese characters have been aligned in various speaking differentiation for thousands of years, while Chinese characters have been recognized by all people in a unified text. Chinese characters make people communicate with each other, while the diaphragm is the main obstacle to uniform. So in "Issue", "Voice", Chinese characters are not more than English. Nowadays, the huge character set of Chinese characters is generally considered to make it very complicated: difficult to learn, difficult, difficult. But this is a matter of which it needs to be cleared: That is the "word" of Chinese characters and "Word" in English is different. Now in primary and secondary education needs to master 2000-3000 Chinese characters to meet daily reading. But this is not just learning 2000-3000 "words", but learning 2000-3000 concepts. One person can learn 26 English letters within one day, but can he read English? Because English is not typical "phonetic text", you have no mastery of 26 letters and even accurate words. To the end, in the national primary and secondary schools in English, there is still a lot of words spelling training. Master 2000-3000 English words? Can you pay your daily reading? People who have learned English understand! Studies have shown that Chinese characters are a complex text symbol system that is highly entropy. The basic method of research is to gradually expand the Chinese character capacity. As the Chinese character capacity increases, the increase in information entropy is slower; after the Chinese characters are increased to 12,370, it will no longer make the information entropy significantly increase. my country's scientists pointed out that the capacity limit of Chinese characters is 12,366 Chinese characters, and the value of Chinese character static average information entropy is 9.65 bits. This is a text symbol system that is the largest amount of information in the world through the famous Sipf'SLAW. Comparison of information entropy of the five working languages of the United Nations: French: 3.98 Bit Spanish: 4.01 Bit English: 4.03 Bit Russia: 4.35 Bit Sinoptics: 9.65 Bit It can be seen that the information entropy of pinyin text is small, and the difference is not big. The amount of information of Chinese characters is the largest. What is the concept of this information entropy advantage of Chinese characters on Pinyin? Simple metaphor is the difference between decimal number and binary number. The decimal digital system requires someone to remember 0-9, 10 symbols, and binary only requires memory 0 and 1 symbols. Ten etiquette should be memorized 9 × 9 tables, and binary only needs to learn, or, non-simple logic.
However, why is human beings do not use a binary digital system in daily life? Because it is very wasteful, a number "7" said that it has become "111", which is not exhausted. In turn, why don't human beings use sixteen companies, or higher? On the one hand, it is a restriction of human brain intelligence. On the other hand, hexadecimal may not significantly improve information entropy. This information entropy is reflected in the text, which is in the United Nations document, and the Chinese version must be the thinnest. Is the information entropy height is not conducive to computer processing? I am afraid it is still difficult to conclusions in this regard. Simple comparison of Chinese characters and English input speed cannot explain the problem, because "Word" and "Word" are different concepts. To compare, only two different texts of the same content, and calculate the difference between the number of keystrokes. Based on the "Word" unit, modern Chinese is compared to English. Modern English In order to cope with the emerged new things, new ideas, new technology, new concepts are constantly making words. It is nothing more than the latin root, or the re-combined existing words, the more professional technology vocabulary, the more difficult it is. Or a large number of abbreviations: such as WTO, FBI, IBM, UFO, etc., more confusion, it is difficult to understand. In this regard, the advantages of modern Chinese words are very highlighted. This is the advantage of Chinese character character set information entropy. Use modern computer technology as information standards, to measure the advantages and disadvantages of Chinese characters and English letters. Modern computer technology said that the end is based on "diode" technology, and it is difficult to develop in the future. Do you want human high intelligent thinking mode to imitate the "diode" thinking? That is a typical cut. Imagine that this year, because of the inventive black and white illumination, people should waste the color of the oil painting? Is it difficult for people's language to change to "" because Morsian Electric Code is suitable for the new invention. Some difficulties encountered in the application, we should not ignore, but there is no need to exaggerate. After the Chinese invented the orthodontics in that, there was no real application for a long time. It is not until the end of the Qing Dynasty, China is still using a lot of carving printing. The reason is that the number of Chinese characters is too large. It is necessary to make a set of words with a sufficient print. It is not economical. Finally, in the early 20th century, Westerners introduced the mechanism-based word, China realized the orthodontics. In the early days of the 20th century, human beings entered the computer era, the lack of Chinese character treatment software was once an obstacle, but it quickly resolved. Now in the help of computer technology, the spread of Chinese characters is more convenient than ever. True to hinder China's progress is not technical, but the imprisonment of people's thoughts. Before the introduction of the Western ivered words, the European literary revival ideology of Lima sin, Xu Guangqi translated, has been printed through the ancient carving. But at the time and later, it was not worth the Chinese. This is a very sad thing. Under the imprisonment of backward thinking, even if we are like Iran, Turkey has changed its words all into advanced Arabic or Latin spelling, we can't escape the decline like ancient Pos and Osman Empire. Magical Chinese, stupid English least likes to listen to a bottle dissatisfied with half a bottle of people talking about Chinese bad things. What "Chinese is not accurate", "Chinese can't refine". When I remember myself, the language class was written in the emperor: "Take the Pinyin Road is an inevitable trend of Chinese." The main reason is that English can typ, and Chinese can't. I really talk about it now. With the development of computer technology, the keyboard input speed of Chinese characters is far more than English, and it is still rapidly improved as technological progress. Can I speak? It's not going to have a stalk. Modern part of all disciplines, China has a good scholar, did not hear which position is not working because of Chinese "inaccurate". China's rockets can be exactly emptied, and China's atomic bullets can be precisely exploded. All English scientific literature can be translated into Chinese.
The influence of Chinese literature is enhanced worldwide with the enhancement of national strength. Let's take a simple example to show the clumsy: I have questioned several professors "rectangles" how to speak in English, but the mother tongue is the English engineering professor actually said that I didn't know, next to ask a few Local graduate students, they don't know. I am so shocked! Now I want to ask readers: Do you know? Anyway is not Cube, Rectangular ...... Later, I really found the word in the dictionary, but now I forgot, because it is too angry. Sigh, English is a stupid language, trying to give every thing in the world. The universe is endless, and the English vocabulary is endless! Vocabulary such as "Luminous", "Tetracycline", "Strong", "calcium carbonate", "high blood pressure", "kidney stones", "seven-sided", "five sides" only have professionals. It is impossible to touch the class like Chinese, don't believe it? Go to personally ask the native language is English. English is divergent. Some basic concepts, such as "cuboid", only experts will speak! No wonder is so many experts in the English world, and it is so confident; yes, general people even have their basic terms such as "alcoholball" "blood pressure gauge". Living in English is really helpless! Sad! English is a one-dimensional, password language. Write English is code, read English is decoding. Think about it: If you replace the A, B, C, D, E of the English to 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and there is no principled difference. Press the corresponding correspondence. If you start writing the CAB into 312, use the same pronunciation, what is it possible? Chinese is different, it is two-dimensional (maximum dimension on the paper), maximizing the geometric space of the paper. Each Chinese character is a picture. Say the information obtained from a picture is fast, or the information obtained from a line of information is fast? The literacy standards of the national Chinese characters are 1,500 words, and the college students in the science and engineering generally master the 2000 Chinese characters. Based on these 2000 words, you can study, reading newspapers, engage in research. Can be read in the English world, there is no more than 20,000 characters, no 30000 words don't want to read the weekly text, and the college graduates will generally understand 80,000 words. The emergence of new things, the total companions English new words, such as rockets, computers, etc., can be in Chinese, not, "arrows" drove with "fire", will "calculate" "machine" ? You can't do this English, you can't rely on the term, because "too long". If the Rock will become "fire-riven-arrow", the computer will become "computaional-machine", etc. The human perspective is limited, too long words will reduce the ability of the readability and readers. At present, the English vocabulary has exceeded 400,000, and it is expected that in the next century will break through 1 million mark. Chinese is relatively stable, and now the middle school students can also read Qu Yuan Chu words. English is difficult, too unstable. Nowadays, people read the original informality of the Sandy, not to mention the poems of the British poet Qiaozhen 400 years ago. When I learned GRE, I noticed that the vocabulary included in the Weide Dictionary was a new word in the beginning of this century, such as "Gargantuan" taking a novel from La Burner. This is not surprising. After all, English is unified before 400 years ago.
Defend Chinese! Calling the people who are ruined in the following facts: (1) The thinnest one in the official document of the five languages of the United Nations is Chinese; (2) The accuracy of Chinese has been confirmed by the vigorous development of China's science and technology; (3) Computer voice input is the most promising; (4) Chinese is a constant convergence, English is unstable is divergent; (5) Chinese is two-dimensional information is vivid, English is a one-dimensional information. The password type is boring and inefficient. (6) It is a great thing to read literature in the English world. For example, some of the non-states described in English is really difficult. Generally, the best English is only swallowed; can be in the Chinese world, who will be surprised by people who have only secondary school qualifications? (7) Although today is a booming of English civilization. But in the long river in history, the civilized history of So Far, the English world is far from the history of the Chinese world. Proud to Chinese! More convinced that the enthusiasm and confidence of the upcoming Chinese era is coming! Transfer from: http://form.xinhuaet.com/detail.jsp?id=15930688
