Originally, I am looking for the latest .NET components, I found it here, I am! I am really lively, I have been quarreling for half a year, I introduced myself, Delphi I use it from 3, to 7 is useless, TC, BC I used VC , VS, vs.net, which is currently trying to use vs.net2003, 2005, so I still have two sentences in the post, I will give up Delphi is very simple, Delphi future Unknown, I hope that 9 can change it, not saying Delphi is not good, I think it is very good, vs.net, I think it is good, first clarify two concepts: First, the difference between IDE and Framework, second is API and WinAPI Difference, just like a normal user, think that DOS is a command prompt. WINDOW98 is a gray dialog. Windowxp is the blue dialog, confused interface and core concept, although Delphiguy's speech is too excited, but its interpretation of the technical concept is Correct, however, he has a little water, and most people in this post are discussing the ideas of IDE. If you really want to divide advantage, my experience is Delphi7's IDE to be slightly better than VS. Net2003, I died several times with vs.net2003ide, but Delphi is not no problem. For example, Delphi sometimes analyzes incorrect when analyzing COM , and some instability occurs when using third party components (perhaps The problem of components caused, did not study carefully), and the smart prompt function of Delphi IDE did not improve VS / VB / VS.NET. As for the RAD speed, then to see specific applications to give an accurate evaluation, Sometimes Delphi is very fast, sometimes MS's IDE is fast, completely and applied and prepared components, in some complex applications, MS's IDE and Delphi are actually the same, but the scalability is sufficient, but vs.net is introduced After the reflection concept, some are very complicated or even impossible. Now it can be done very simply. It has actually been separated from the discussion of the IDE. It has entered the discussion level of Framework. The Framework's Framework is in thinking In fact, it is very close, and many of my personal opinion, .NET's things are borrowed from VCL's thoughts, and even many methods and attributes (fields) are the same, remember when they have just turned to .NET, I need it. The methods and classes are speculated in accordance with the structure of the VCL. After familiar with the .NET framework (of course, there are still many problems now have not been studied). I feel that .NET has basically in place, and the future development direction is also generally clear. However, it is necessary to spend a lot of effort to be completely encapsulated. This should be just a time problem for Microsoft. Maybe MS will give us a surprise. Of course, the VCL is not no problem. Many concepts in the VCL may only There is Borland and a small number of masters to understand that many of these people who are not deeply involved, of course, this is also the weakness of Delphi resources. As for the issue of IDE before the development, post-development problems, Delphi's pre-development tools have advantages, and the MS's later development tool has weak advantages. It is hard to say so that it is difficult to say, in fact, I think this discussion is to evaluate this. One result: For most applications, who can use less time, less and more easily understood code to develop a more beautiful and more beautiful program. I have a topic in my hand, which can be used to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of the two, interested in trying! And put your code out.
Convert a number of users entered as the data type specified by the user. This is easy to implement under VS.NET, the code is very small, but at least I haven't thought of the way at least in Delphi. From here, you should be able to see .Net tomorrow, you can also understand why delphi wants to support .Net!
