We don't need too high-profile programming technology, as long as you do a good job, because the outgoing technology is already mature. Really? Then think about Intercourse the Declaration of China Institute: "We have to develop 50 years of technology!" Introducing Intercom for at least 50 years of development. You said that the technology is mature, no need to develop, what Intel, Microsoft, IBM they still invest more and more money in their own institute? Why do Gates's brain still can't take out something that makes you stunned? Why do Microsoft still have to pay for the technical master Lippman? Nice, for the developer of the application, especially the programmer of the development project, requires them to be proficient in these underlying technologies, after all, they have to care too much. Because of this, some people need to create advanced tools for them. This is a reasonable division of labor cooperation and is a real industry. It is not necessary to have high-tech, but this area has grown into a separate industry. Ok, it's enough now that the technology is enough. How much do you have to master these technologies? From small smart interbase to powerful DB2, from technology miracle Linux to Windows, from Java to .NET, from Turbo Pascal to Visual Studio, from CORBA to COM, we have never standing in the peak of technology. Since we have no high technology with this, what qualifications are eligible to see high-tech? Especially the young people who have just entered the line, some of the basic skills of the code code are not, followed by the back of the public opinion, and the innocent call is useless. Minimum requirements, no development of new technologies, at least existing technologies should be understood. In fact, our software industry is not technical, but technology is scarce. Not just that there is no designed analyst, and there is no technical programmer. Now the mainstream is to drag the control from the control panel of the RAD tool, you will die. The muds and sands are all in the mud. In the field of artificial intelligence such as high technical requirements, we were thrown behind the opponent. Take a look at the game made by Americans, what is the level of entertainment products such as Quick and Unreal? Think about it, remember those american missiles that trace the target with the camera on TV news? Do we have such a level? Even if you do MIS, you don't need to understand compilation, at least you have to know how to write available, readable, and maintained code. If a programmer does not even have the basic skills, how do you implement software design? If a company doesn't even have a similar technology, how can I be based in a cruel market? One common sense in economics, a industry that does not enter the barrier, one who can do, there will be no profit. Since you don't have any profits in the field, why do you still have to complain about too little income? High-tech investment is high, less return, not worth doing, can't afford it. Supporting this IT world is an increasingly intricate technology. An unavoidable truth is that it is the real overlord, mastering the real cutting-edge technology, Microsoft, IBM, Sun, Oracle. They understand the true face of virtual machines, frames, and development environments bringing them rich profits. If the high-tech is really a rich toy, it is in fact, this is the source of high returns. Today, the Microsoft in the world is exquisite for 4K Basic. It was once a new era with Turbo Pascal with Turbo Pascal.
