I have linked a DDJ in a .NET expert announced an exit .NET circle 8 hung. Today, Mr. Fox tells me that this topic is the hot topic of the 9CBS home page.
9CBS, this is an interview with the chief expert of the software development of Microsoft (China) Development Cooperation, and one of the domestic MVPs also published their own anti-revision.
In fact, Richard's original text I didn't look carefully (E Wen 8 good), but I didn't see too many comments on technical issues, especially because this person is a VB expert, so most of his opinions are concentrated On VB.NET, more ineezes for .NET Framework. Such as Lox Comments: If it is not DDJ, I will definitely think this is a rookie in nonsense, --_- ||. I agree with this, because I haven't mentioned a ".Net myth", I have written a ".NET myth", I didn't know how the sky is thick, pointing out that the MS is too large and the actual situation in the. Of course, the view is that there is a big deviation, and the discussion is too naive. But unfortunately, there are hundreds of people who don't know the cloud at all, they are not worth mentioning.
This Richard's article can be said that there is a stone to arouse thousands of waves. It is said that it is very hot on TSS - even 8 go to the E-article. It is still unfortunately, valuable comments are still a few, and I have seen several foreign developer comments sent to me on MSN, and some are not much better than some people in China.
But after all, Richard is DDJ .NET expert, influence is still very large, and even the C # product manager of MS will come. It can be seen that this chaos is large. This variation from the interior of the camp is a big blow to MS.NET.
In this covered comment, MS supporters are almost the same, almost the same almost three years ago: that is, those of Richard is not a problem. For example, the previous Cao Yanming, that mvp, and Liu Ruhong's article. Almost, although some are true, but some aspects don't dare to agree. For example, I have said in ".NET myth", and the version of the version of the fox: I installed .NET Framework 1.0, the main reason is the difference between 1.0, 1.1, 2005 various versions. Too big, now do .Net development will have a feeling of unsatisfaction. I have also said that .Net's question, MS's support is: You can do it, anyway, no conflict. I want to ask: TMD MS sponsorship occasional hard disk?
Confused Java, making the fox: For example, Java, I am deleted 1.4 after I installed JDK1.5, and there is no problem. I also have a similar experience: change an applet written with JDK1.1, I have changed in JDK1.3, 1.4 and 1.5 three versions, and compile commissioning with Eclipse 2.1 / 3.0, except for some prompts that have been used. In addition, there is basically no problem. Moreover, the program can run normally in JRE1.1 or later.
This is just a small aspect of the problem. But it reflects how great risks will be fully ported to .NET for developers. Besides, that is repeatedly criticized by MS experts: why Microsoft does not use all existing products completely with .NET to write off?
The MVP is very pair: one of the most stupid things in a software company is the company's management listening to the following sentence: "God, the old version of the code is simply garbage, our only choice is Head design a new system, builds the best technology! "Numerous software companies are under this sentence.
So ok, even MS is so big, so rich companies are afraid to do it. So as an even these small developers, it is not a self-seeking S way under the existing code to .NET? MS is too embarrassed? Do you want to die? Net? So this ".NET, I don't want to say that I love you" in the blogger "article topic can explain the problem. In general, Meng Ran's ".NET faces trust crisis, the root causes the target blur" to say quite inin. Monk said: Meng Ran guy, how fast it is to help lippman say C / CLi for some time, today this article also criticizes .NET strategy blurry, huh, huh ~~. I said: In such a world, no one will not dilute. Linghu said: It is especially important to embark Microsoft.
As a consistent supporter of Java, this "dictatorship is a risk" inevitably biased toward Java, which is not very good. If the fox said: Meng Ran is basically the most pertinent. Richard and Dan are two parties, and they are also empty, GIGIX, Java has always supported, and fud .NET is not very good.
However, I am very agreeable with the MS dictatorship proposed by Gigix. I plan to write an article on this aspect last year, just because of the causes, I didn't write a few words.
