The leadership and subordinates are still needed in some big, principled issues. The result of the debate, can make things properly resolved, the career, the leadership. The correct debate should be the following: You clearly see the opinions of leaders, don't argue, when serious consequences, leaders will say that you can't do it, or why did you not find and promptly remind? 2, the argument must have the proposition of the preparation leaders, have their own basis, you want to deny his basis, there is more than him, more explained more, and more about the problem. Unprepared arguments, only sliding into sophistications. There is not enough preparation, you must give up the debate. 3, the argument must have a sturdy debate, so that the other party will suddenly feel that it is the performance of your emotion. For example, you can find the leadership and say: "I have a certain problem, some ideas, can I delay your time and I discuss ..." This, the leaders will feel the seriousness of the problem and your friendly attitude, for solving the entire The problem will be beneficial. 4, the debate must be insisted from the problem, not to tell "how you" how to say "How do you", don't say bad words of the other opinions, such as "your opinion, purely nonsense talk" language, It is also a non-polite behavior that hurts the opponent's self-respect. Don't involve things other than the problem, for example, "This is what you usually do not pay attention to the results of investigation research", or say "You is not humble", it is not a language within the controversy. 5, don't take too long, no matter whether there is an ideal result, there is no longer time. To a certain stage, you must end, you can say "Rong I think again" and end the debate. 6, you must be politely debated or have not been unified. At the end, you should say to the leader: "My opinion is not necessarily right, please lead the reference." Or say: "In the discussion, some words Improper, please lead the forgiveness. "This is the benefit of continuing or no longer arguing next time. It is absolutely unavailable because it is not uniform, and it is absolutely unavailable. 7. For the same question, don't argue multiple arguments, you can't unify, you can put it in practice. Most of the things will never be all right, constantly correct in practice, should also be allowed, and it is also the first principle of practical. It is true that it is true and does not meet the actual situation. The argument is indispensable. The normal debate is a good way to active democratic atmosphere, and it is also a good way to improve leadership and leadership. Some leaders advocate argument in the unit, so you can participate more arguments. If the leader is an uncomfortable, you will have to participate in the debate or all to avoid debate. Because the debate will not make your relationship with the leaders more harmonious. The correct argument should be the following: 1. The problem is that the arguments have been said, small, non-principled problems argue, to avoid, but do not wait for the problem.
