This is also the text written while practicing in October last year. Or is there a word: Don't be true!
Most profitable person
Wang Wei Gang, October 2004
-------------------------------
In the low, crowded office area, the number of labynds consisting of the computer table and the partition, in every small compartment of the labyrinth, the programmer excavated the code of the code like a mouse. . After a while, I finished the keyboard, and the wind generally passed the homepage of countless development sites. The programmer shouted with code, - in this brave shout, the keyboard heard joy! In this shout, full of desire for success! In this shout, the keyboard feels an angry power, passionate flames and victory confidence. Look, the programmer fleszes like a elf - proud, cold hacker empire in the code, ─ They laugh, while singing ... They laugh at those stupid users, they call for joy ! Coding, test, release, money, reputation, status! ─ ─ Storm! The storm of wealth is coming! This is a brave programmer, between the emergency needs, flying in front of the roar customers and leaders. This is the prognosticer of Victory.
-------------------------------
Can programmers get rich? Can programmers work to make our fame and fortune? Some programmers take the work as a means of supporting the family, and some of the programmers regard the work as a shortcut that accumulates the wealth; some of the programmers regard the work as an ideal platform, and some of the programmers regard the work as a happy premise. Do you think which programmer is more likely to get the wealth? What does we do in most programmers? Is it a mansion on the shore of the West Lake or Lin Baojiei's sports car? Is it a sprinkler of the milky, or the honor of the qi? Is the romantic love, or a free life? In turn, do wealth is really important? Is wealth really not important? But what is this relationship? In fact, I would like to know, in the two things in programmers and wealth, which one is because of the fact - exactly the programmer created wealth, or the wealth point woke up programmer?
-------------------------------
In the software industry, what kind of people can bring the biggest benefits for themselves? We can consider this problem from the opposite angle: If you are the main industry, how will you allocate material wealth to the various characters in the industry? Perhaps you will give priority to get the most rewards, but this is just because yourself is a programmer. Don't you think about jumping into the circle, use the bystander's vision? For example, the software industry in front of you is just a "Empire Times" or "the rise of the country" on the computer screen, you just command a national, a military game player. At this time, if you have a chance to reward your subordinates, will you prioritize which game role? Of course, you will not prioritize your farmers, miners and logging, because you don't spend too much resources when you make them. Will you grant the warrior of the charges? No, you won't. You clearly know that a large number of swordssels, knights, long guns, gunners, the only mission of the bow hands from the war line, the only mission of the bow, resolutely move toward the enemy's fort. So, do you help you accumulate funds to get the highest reward? Yes, you will be careful to protect the business people and the trade route they have worked hard, but you obviously will not let them get the highest glory, because the businessman is just a piece of chess that you have realized trade hegemony in the game. What is the monks who eat Buddha Buddha? In the game, they can inform the military unit of hostile forces, they can fix your own city and equipment, you can keep your troops highly fighting, are they worth commendation and award? Don't worry, why not leave the most tempting reward to a more important role? Why don't you consider Attira Khan, Alexander Emperor, or Napoleon? Although these virtual monarchs will never contribute half-time for your national progress, trade exchanges and military struggles, but they are symbol of the entire nation or country you control! In fact, there is a more sensible choice - put the rewards to leave you yourself before the computer! why? Is this asked? Who is created and promoted the process of the game? Who chooses and controls the monarchs on the screen? Who let monks, merchants, sergeants and peasants who have one heart, with the enemy? - is you, you are a game player who dominated the entire battle! -------------------------------
Repeat our question: If you are the master of the entire industry, how would you allocate material wealth to the various characters in the industry? Do you want to assign the most wealth to those programmers? No, you will not, on the battlefield of the entire software industry, the programmer is a hard work of farmers, miners and logging workers, and the programmer is also a slamming Swordsman, a knight, a long gunman, a gunner and a bow. Even the programmer climbed to the point of the system analyst, the project manager and the technical director. They are only the cornerstone of the software industry, rather than "God" - at least in the industry. Mainland China is still an uncomfortable fact. That is, although many software companies have seven-digit or even higher annual salary with technical director or senior vice president, although some technical patents or "core" source code can With a thinned business, it is not a "outstast household", which is not a "outstast house" profession, and the programmer's income level will never be in the entire software industry. Tips in the pyramid. On the contrary, the market or sales personnel who play "businessman" role in the software industry are likely to "get rich" because of the success of product promotion. Very few companies in China have implemented salaries "commission" system for market and salesperson, which allows "businessmen" to completely get rid of monthly salary, annual salary system, allowing their income to float over a larger range. Of course, successful marketing also requires superman's wisdom and superior courage, and is around the marketing star, often find hundreds of thousands of fits. In addition, the management of the company is in the middle of the industrial pyramid at least on the organizational map, and they usually get a relatively stable high salary. If we are further exploring, we are not difficult to find that in most software companies in China, market and sales staff are usually more opportunistic to increase the manager, branch office or whole company than software developers. The truth is not complicated: most software companies in mainland China seem to be more likely to translate into business profits than knowledge and technical resources; and master market and customer resources are obviously more suitable At the position where the manager is sitting. Software companies can play "monks" in the industry: they don't necessarily care about whether a company has core competitiveness, and they don't necessarily care about whether a manager has the ability to implement some of the most popular quality. Management system, their direct attention can only be - when can I generate more money? In the eyes of these "monks", there are many ways to pay for money. Through the technical advantage, profitability is similar to the use of "witchcraft" to create their own special forces, through additional investment, expand production scale profit is similar to the combat unit " The bloody ", and profitable through the shares and the entity is similar to the" transformation "enemy battle unit.
Therefore, once wealth has become capital, our line of sight will inevitably transfer from simple software development and corporate operation to a more macro, more risk and more, and we will come to the level of new wealth. At this time, we even our company is Whether it is still no longer mind next year, why would you mind if your programmer can get the most relaxing reward in the industry? So, who is the software industry at Etila Khan, Alexander Emperor or Napoleon? Furthermore, who is the "game player" that hides behind the industry to develop rules for the entire industry and manipulate the entire industry. Perhaps you, maybe he, maybe a large capital into the football circle so that you will be a unhappy indifference, maybe a certain look is not amazing, and everyone is a brune show. Of course, it is also possible to be some kind. I can't see it, I can't touch it. I have no industries, and there is no industrial ghost! There is no doubt that in the domestic software industry, the probability of making a family is far less than the market and sales staff, and the latter's stable income is usually more than senior management in software companies, compared to the company's investment People will have more benefits, but they still have to listen to the rules of the entire industry and the game supervisor. In fact, this wealth law is also invisible in the more developed software industry in Europe and America. Only, in Europe and the United States more advocating the social background of personal value, some "super" programmers who have grasped good opportunities may quietly climb The tip of the wealth pyramid, sitting on a chair in the world's rich list. Think about it, even though the world's world's richest, the manager, the manager, etc., did he still like to call himself a programmer or software architect? This complicated, seemingly economists can completely analyze the wealth games that are similar to us who are playing with us. Cats can eat rats, dogs can catch cats, tiger energy win, like energy, and Rats can also flee from all walks of life ... -------------------------------
This is not a software industry in which it is not a software industry that is unconfined in some positions. If you are keen to chase the wealth in no rescue, the most regrettable thing is to become a professional programmer; if you have had the enthusiasm of admire technology and try innovation, then you, The most brutal thing is to completely succumb to the temptation of money. So, when you choose the profession of programmers, you will ultimately face the two difficulties of technology and wealth. At this time, will you consider other solutions? I mean, why do we have to regard wealth as the ultimate goal of professional struggle? Is it more important than our life than our happiness? If a person can be happy in a lifetime, then, what is the difference between wealth or less? If a person can't find happiness under the entanglement of wealth, what is his life and the meaning of life? If you are a programmer or write a code for you is the biggest fun, why do you have to have much wealth after ten years? Having wealth is not equal to having happiness, and happiness is not equal to rejecting wealth. Why can't we regard happiness as our supreme ideal and pursuit? Some people say that people chasing happiness are likely to be more likely to get rich in wealth than those who purely chase wealth. - I don't know how to prove this arbitrary, but as an occupational programmer, I would rather believe in it.
-------------------------------
