Game Theory has a lot of common in management with business companies. There is a classic case in game theory, which is worthy of entrepreneurs and merchants to understand and analyze. It is said that there are two prisoners to do bad things, and the results are discovered by the police, and they are related to the two independent cells that cannot communicate with the cell. In this case, two prisoners can make their own choices: or to provide his association (ie, in cooperation with the police, betraying his accomplices), or keeps silence (that is, cooperate with his association, not Police cooperation). Both prisoners know that if they can stay silent, they will be released, because as long as they refuse to admit, the police can't convict them. But the police also understand this, so they gave these two prisoners a little stimulus: if they betrayed it, I told him that he can be released, and you can get a bonus. . His accomplices will be sentenced in accordance with the heaviest sin, and in order to aggravate punishment, it is necessary to impose a fine of his accompanying, as a reward for the arms. Of course, this is exactly the "two difficulties" sets set by the police: according to the above requirements, if the two prisoners betrayed each other, the two people will be sentenced to the most important sin, no one will get a reward . This is the prisoner's dilemma. So what should these two prisoners do? Is it choosable to cooperate with each other or betray each other? From the surface, they should cooperate with each other, keep silent, because they can get the best results: freedom. However, the nature of humans always wants to go to their own perspective, for this, they have to consider the attitude of each other may take care: Suppose A is not a fool, he immediately realizes that the interest is currently, the companion will not No evidence to the police, then went with a rich reward from prison, let him sit alone. This kind of idea is too tempting. He also unconsciously thought that his colony was not a fool, and he would imagine him. So the conclusion of A is that the only rational choice is betrayal, telling everything to the police, because if his colony is stupid, it will only be silent, then he will be the luckyer who bless prison. And if his associates are also over, then, the A is also prison, and at least he doesn't have to be fined here. Therefore, regardless of the two criminals to envision, the result is ultimately in accordance with the logic regarding everything, if the implementation of the deal, the final double has got the worst retribution: journey. Of course, in the real world, trust and cooperation rarely reach such a difficult situation. Negotiation, interpersonal relationship, mandatory contracts and many other factors have left right. But the two difficulties of prisoners have indeed caught untrust and need to prevent this real side of this true side. In the real world, both in nature or in human society, cooperation and betray are all visible everywhere. Then, the problem will appear: What mechanism does the mechanism encounter biology or human cooperation or betray? A political scientist, a political scientist in the University of Michigan, USA, found an answer after deep research. In order to carry out research on cooperation, he organized a computer competition. The idea of this competition is very simple: Anyone who wants to participate in this computer competition plays a prisoner in the "Prisoner Dilemma" case. They brought their own strategy into the computer program, and their programs will be integrated into different combinations pairs. After the group, participants started playing "prisoners' dilemma" games. Each of them must make choices between cooperation and betrayal. They don't just play this game, but I have played 200 times over again.
