Tonight, a colleague talked about some of the idea of software engineering, he is a pursuit of cutting-edge technologists, and it is a lively person! In fact, his point of view is true:
"1, many software is not manufactured, it is created;"
"2, for documentation, documentation, managers, no ability to check the true value of the document"
"3, have you done every step? The answer is not yet, then you will fail, and you can't help others."
I am more like a person who likes to be pragmatic, but sometimes makes others feel "idealism". It is undeniable that ideas can be said to be "soul" in the software industry. Without creativity, it is equal to "plagiarism". In fact, it is not difficult to find that the software in the current market is the same, and the software has the same software. Software manufacturers often create some new IT nouns, "MIS, ERP, .NET, .COM", etc. . .
But how many doctors really doing software? Of course, except for monopolic levels such as MS, IBM! Just as universal software, domestic flagship products Jinshan WPS, Zhongke Red Flag, and the Seamed Seamed. Are taking advantage of MS! Do you really have "creative"?
Let's talk about article 2, "written for documents". This is the most commonly listening and very spicy in the software industry. CMM is only provided to a more "mature" method system for the IT industry, but it does not explain or suggests how everyone can do it! In fact, the original meaning is clear! In software engineering, more than this method system is used. The CMM was born in the US Department of Defense. It could have determined its application and conditions, but later changed, it became "civil". It may not have a big problem in the United States and other developed countries, but in China, this is impossible, one is the national condition, the second is China's capitalists don't like the capitalists in Western countries, at least the minimum business philosophy Not the same as the operation of the funds.
Article 3, "Are every step?", Huh, I dare to be sure, it is impossible in China, one is the boss feels "this is a waste of resources"; the second is to really understand the CMM. .
OK, I will say this today. . . . . . .