The article is here. The author has lost its innovative cultural and suffering from HP. I read it is also quite sentiment. How many excellent companies have fisted because of short-term profits (especially the company's high-level income) and the stress of the holders, and finally disappeared.
The author compares Carly Fiorina and a factory supervisor born in Hungary. Combine this article again. A CEO is annoying this point by his employees, and it will be failed. However, Carly Fiorina took 20 million departure and it was said to go to the World Bank to work. The United States seems to have a tradition of reward failure, as long as this failure is large enough. Just like the discussion on Slashdot, look at Carly, Bush, Cia, Ramsfield, knowing this tradition. There is also an interesting 8: Generally, everyone thinks that the CARLY FIORINA has a lack of vision (no creation, but also is committed to cutting the company's operating costs and merging with COMPAQ). But this HP Board of Directors forced her reason for her, but she is not performed.
The article mentions some interesting history. For example, Bill Packard staff to remind the importance of bold innovation: Bill Hewlett used to remind us that The marketing guys said the HP-35 would be a failure because it was too small, and then we could not make them fast enough to meet the demand The Marketing Folks Don't Know Everything. "
