We communicated through the QQ group at the beginning of the project, and then built an internal collaborative platform, and there is an irregular meeting. Three communication paths with the master - informal ways, conferences, and work manuals - do not meet. However, the effect of execution is not ideal. Is the master? Not. We have not used these several ways. We use the meeting to solve a lot of small misunderstandings; too many QQ groups, one is that there is too many messages when landing QQ, the second is that this method is very effective for small misunderstandings. However, for some comprehensive understanding of systems must pass documents; but rarely use collaborative platforms, there is no careful reading of documents, and there is no habit of a full document.
Even in the communication of QQ group, there is no clear expression. I often see: "A certain: Is there a problem there?" Where? what is the problem? QQ is transmitted through UDP, where there is no need to send ACK, and the other party can transfer by the server through the server, send a post to the forum or send mail directly. Then someone answers: "Is it impossible?" What can happen, as long as it can meet the conditions. The domain name is not too easy to fly, what else is impossible? The problem is first looking for reasons from itself and discovering all possible.
