Monopoly may be the result of competition
The US rich enemy, a Microsoft, a gold paint sign, recently known as the largest anti-monopoly lawsuit of this century, was killed by the judge to fall in the water! Although I have to be sentenced next year, but this sentence is also a little fierce, and the court will not get a sweetness. It is said that Microsoft intends to appeal, but the appeal can neither get new evidence, and the opportunity to succeed is not big. I don't think about it, I used to be an expert in the US anti-monopoly lawsuit, studied in academic research, and after the experience, two behind-the-case economic theoretical consultants. I agree with competition, so I never oppose competitive methods to fight for monopoly. Therefore, in the anti-monopoly case produced under the free market competition, I will always stand on the side of the defense. I invite me for consultants several times, I have pushed. After the Judge of Microsoft official announced his insight, some people cheered, especially those who have competed with Microsoft. Hong Kong's "Nanhua Morning Post" also stands on the side of the judge, thinking that Microsoft is not. I think these people don't understand the market, I don't understand competition, and I don't understand what the US anti-monopoly legislation is. It's not easy to believe that the US anti-monopoly legislation is complete, and it is always arbitrary, it is very chaotic. This legality is not a patent, nor monopoly, but monopoly intention and action. That is, this legislation is not the "monopoly" of the noun, but the "monopoly" of the verb. However, all the competition in the market is to kill the opponent, not many is a little monopoly "action". It is said that the lawsuit of anti-monopoly has been arbitrarily chaos, and Microsoft's current lawsuit is example. If you don't make so much money, if you are, what is the rich? If you and I tried Microsoft to do business in the United States, I can't make money, or a big loss, then even if you are prosecuted with me, the US government will definitely be open. In other words, Microsoft's problem is that money makes "too many", which is invincible in the competition. It is a puzzling that it has never been mentioned in the anti-monopoly legislation. I think in addition to making money, Today, Microsoft is in the predicament encountered in this lawn, there are three reasons. One is that they do not use the jury. It is possible that the US anti-monopoly lawsuit has changed when he participated in twenty years ago, but as far as I know, the charged party can choose whether there is still no jury. In that year, the general lawyer believed that complex cases, the jury was difficult to understand, so the order was given by judges. Microsoft's case is extremely complicated, but I think that choosing a jury is the best policy. This is because some people bought Microsoft stocks - or at least many friends bought Microsoft and earned money - and in the minds of the general public, Microsoft's image is really good. This company made the economy of Seattle and the United States today with a great hero of the world. Second, Microsoft is in this lawsuit, although the lawyer hired is absolutely first, the interpretation of economic theory is insufficient. The concept of competition and monopoly actually did not explain the judge. Third, sell the software with hardware, prevent the software from being pirated or stolen. This is a focus: Microsoft can say that they insist on soft, hard work, not for monopoly, but to fight for software. I think at least a certain extent, this is the fact, but why didn't Microsoft say this? The cause of monopoly has four. We will measure from the perspective of social and economic interests, only one is not advisable. One is that monopolists have special talents, like Dunlijun's singers, more or less monopoly. This monopoly should not be prohibited. If Deng Lijun is still, do you want to kill her, or let her smile often open? The second monopoly is a patented or copyright, or a secret secret. This should not be prohibited.
