"If the recruiting person thinks that I apply is SB, then I am sure to be recruiting SB; if the leader thinks that the hand is SB, then the hand is definitely thinking that leadership is also SB" This is 2 SB theory, it is a colleague. He is in an international 500-strong national enterprise. He is a SB, awarded, and the head began to treat him as SB; no alone, my colleague, in a 500 foreign company, I also encountered this problem, he wrote a small program with VB, used to use some statistics in the head statistics, and the head will not write the program. I have always used manual statistics. This time I solved this time. The big problem of the head, but the head is first to pick three, I will pick up three, saying that the code is not standard, and then, "You have not written J2EE's procedure", my colleague said to me " Our 2 people used the amateur small product, I am so good to help him write it out, actually said that my style is not good, I still launched that I have never written J2EE, I don't know how to infer ""
There is no doubt that my colleague's boss believes that my colleague is a SB. My colleague also believes that his boss is a SB. I wrote this post, I want to sum up some of my problems I have encountered in the previous project team, why Everyone's SB will always take it? In fact, there is no SB in this world. If a team thinks all the other SB, then communication must have serious obstacles, there is no effective communication, so everyone Everything in each other is SB, a team that is all SB does not have a good team. There are no happies in this team. Similarly, this project is impossible to succeed. A successful team, definitely being smart People are composed. Our university graduated from a research institute. It is a lot of years. Although all his all kinds are not as good, colleagues are always very happy. Many years have passed, everyone rushes, but still friends And the evaluation of the other party is also good. After coming from the research, I went to another commercial company for a small technology, from there was a team, 10 people, get one million people Item. Although the project is completed, but it is not successful. When I started, the people I think of the project group did not live, no brain. The people of the project team are more big, the most serious is A little girl has sent a warning email to I, threatening to me. During the project, the n individual left, after the project, I also crushed. Now, although the project group is still, I can still listen To each other of the project group, each other is complaining, and each other is not serious. The technical level is poor. I think this is not a successful team. In the two SB theory, this is no doubt is a group of SB Join one piece. After leaving this company, I summed up this project. I feel as a technical person in charge, and the members of the project are effectively communicated. I communicate serious obstacles, but how to solve This obstacle, I don't know. After more than a year, I changed a mentality and ran to a company for a general programmer. The company started to make a industry software, just entered this industry, everything From the beginning, the team has just established, 2 weeks, I found that I have encountered various problems encountered in the past, a group of SBs have been a piece, I have planned to open it during the trial period, but this time, I It is a programmer, changing the problem, summarizes some lessons, SB is another two, can no longer be three. Let's talk about our team, the company is developed by industry software, team 6 people, project manager ( A) I don't know, but since he is a project manager, it is estimated that there is still some people, but I haven't found it. 2 industries (B, c), they are not too good at software development, but There is still a certain understanding of this industry, I belong to mixing for a few years, I have some development experience, but I don't know anything about this industry, there are 2 young men (e , F), seems to be between me and the industry, software experience seems to be less than me, but industry experience is more than me, industry experience is less than BC, but software experience is much more. It should be said, this is a complementary comparison Strong team, if you cooperate, you should learn a lot of things, but now, everyone seems to think that the other party is SB. And the performance of SB is: 1. B, C has been There have been many conflicts, B, C believe that A does not make a good development plan for them, they don't know what to do, A believes that BC does not understand software development, and what is written is not something. 2. I personally a is very Not pleasing, because A is very low in the interview, think that I can't work, after cutting my salary, I will trick me, this will definitely make me feel not very good, and usually Always skeptical to my technology, always ask me, I have seen it, I have seen it, I think he thinks that I am a SB. 3.e, f seems to be disdainful to the department manager, when meeting, when the department manager Occasionally, when the wrong technique, E, and f immediately showed disdain. Attitude to me, when I asked them an industry problem, they were very hot, it seems to say, "So SB problem, you actually Also ask "
