Key words: personality; professional; college student
【Abstract】 Objective To observe the test situation of Card's 16PF in contemporary different professional college students. Methods Liu Yonghe amended Card's 16PF for collective psychological tests on 1053 schools, liberal arts, and art students, and 52 students were repeated. The 32 patients with CCMD-II-R patients were tested for 16PF. Results There were significant differences between 16PF personality factors in contemporary different professional students. In 24 personality factors and composite personality factors, there were 17 significant differences in men (P <0.05, P <0.01), and 22 have 22 significant differences in women. (P <0.05, P <0.01). Caideon 16PF reattrates good stability, (re-test correlation R = 0.134 ~ 0.838, P = 0.02 ~ 0.0001). The T test conducted by patients with college neurosis and medical students showed that there were 9 personality factors and composite personality factors, and there were 12 personality factors and composite personality factors in women. Conclusion The diversified trend of contemporary college students' personality changes, and establishing professional constant models is top priority. 16PF researcies have good correlation, high degree of hardship. Significant differences in patients with neurosis and medical students suggest a personality defect in patients with neuropractic factors.
With the changes in psychological diseases and the improvement of quality education status, colleges and universities have greatly regarded guidance of mental health of college students. At present, most colleges and universities use 16PF and SCL-90 as an assessment indicator of college mental health status [1, 2]. There are reports that there is no intention to use in the use of 1PF in the Ka 16PF [3]. In order to fully understand the test of 16PF in college students, we have tested 1053 second-year college students in 1053 patients under the support of the Youth Research Fund. He is hereby summarized.
Object and method
I. 1053 undergraduate students in the second grade of the second year, 333 schools in the medical department of Shandong Medical University (science), 316 girls; 128 schools in the Education Department of Shandong Normal University, 150 girls; Shandong Art College art (Art) 67 boys and 59 girls. Age distribution 17.5 ~ 23.5 years old, with an average age of 19.9. Second, Method 1. Collective psychological tests (Peking University Psychology) with Liu Yonghe Dr. 16PF Chinese revised. A total of 1053 questionnaire were issued, 1053 effective questionnaires were recovered, and the recovery rate was 100%. 2. To observe the stability of 16PF test, select 52 subjects (27 men, female 25) were repeated 4 weeks after the first test. 3. To observe the identification of 16PF, 32 patients with neurosis in the Psychological Counseling Treatment Center, including 15 men, 17 female, average age 23 (17 ~ 32 years old), all cases comply with CCMD-II- R Diagnostic criteria, 16PF personality test.
Fruit
I. Different major male college students 16PF test results showed that there were 17 differences in 24 personality factors. In personality factors with significant differences, medical students have high scores on independence, emotional use and sereneous alarms and mental health; literary students have higher in constructing, adaptation and anxiety, weakness and decisiveness. Score; students in the art students in smart, stability, strongness, constant sex, dare, sensitivity, fantasy, self-discipline, internal and external, professional achievement, creativity, growth capacity has high score (See Table 1).
Table 1 Comparison of 16PF personality factors of different professional college students
Personality Factors Male (± S) Female (± S) Medical Professional Arts Art Neurosis Medical Major Arts Art Neurosis (N = 333) (n = 128) (n = 67) (n = 15) (n = 316 (N = 150) (n = 59) (n =
17) 1. Holicitability 5.27 ± 1.82 ** 6.42 ± 1.68 ** 5.48 ± 1.77 5.73 ± 2.10 5.70 ± 1.83 6.33 ± 1.69 ** 7.21 ± 1.56 ** 4.90 ± 1.16 * 2. Clearance 5.44 ± 2.15 ** 4.64 ± 1.96 ** 5.91 ± 1.89 6.96 ± 2.05 ** 5.07 ± 2.95 4.69 ± 1.83 * 5.88 ± 1.86 3. Stability 5.58 ± 1.98 5.59 ± 1.99 * 6.24 ± 1.85 ** 4.55 ± 2.48 ** 5.29 ± 1.94 5.29 ± 2.89 ** 6.84 ± 2.01 ** 3.91 ± 2.73 * 4. 恃 strongness 6.34 ± 1.63 6.19 ± 1.95 6.62 ± 1.98 5.55 ± 2.75 6.23 ± 1.96 6.30 ± 1.91 * 6.94 ± 1.88 ** 5.56 ± 2.74 5. Excite 6.03 ± 2.30 5.93 ± 2.08 6.18 ± 2.01 5.68 ± 3.04 6.95 ± 2.08 ** 6.25 ± 2.24 ** 7.88 ± 2.50 ** 5.56 ± 3.14 6. Hanging 4.70 ± 1.83 4.68 ± 1.87 ** 5.76 ± 1.85 ** 3.72 ± 1.51 * 4.74 ± 2.02 ** 5.55 ± 1.82 6.08 ± 2.02 ** 4.52 ± 1.60 7. Dare is sex 5.69 ± 2.04 5.06 ± 2.29 ± 2.79 6.06 ± 2.56 5.98 ± 2.14 ** 7.88 ± 2.29 ** 5.74 ± 2.82 8. Sensitivity 5.19 ± 1.97 ** 6.01 ± 1.92 6.37 ± 2.21 4.65 ± 1.89 ** 5.51 ± 1.78 5.56 ± 2.26 ** 5.27 ± 2.26 9. Doubt 4.47 ± 2.05 4.27 ± 1.71 4.01 ± 2.29 3.63 ± 2.99 3.96 ± 2.53 ± 2.07 4.62 ± 2.06 10. Fantasy 5.77 ± 1.54 5.53 ± 1.81 ** 6.46 ± 1.70 ** 6.01 ± 2.01 5.73 ± 1.56 5.47 ± 1.56 ** 6.21 ± 1.31 * 5.81 ± 1.57 11. Strong 5.15 ± 1.58 4.98 ± 1.60 5.33 ± 1.60 6. 22 ± 2.79 ± 2.49 5.61 ± 1.76 5.13 ± 2.49 12. Worry 4.95 ± 2.85 5.37 ± 2.09 4.08 * 4.60 ± 2.08 * 5.02 ± 1.98 ** 3.68 ± 2.51 ** 7.57 ± 2.32 * * 13. Experimental 5.43 ± 1.62 5.61 ± 1.68 5.75 ± 1.53 5.44 ± 1.73 ± 1.75 * 6.44 ± 1.73 ** 4.6 ± 1.28 ** 14. Independence 5.65 ± 1.78 5.38 ± 1.73 5.15 ± 1.68 * 4.66 ± 1.99 5.29 ± 1.77 5.39 ± 1.93 * 4.81 ± 1.80 5.29 ± 1.73 15. Self-discipline 5.16 ± 1.75 5.05 ± 1.98 ** 5.89 ± 1.74 ** 4.01 ± 1.59 ** 4.80 ± 1.77 5.10 ± 1.74 ** 5.78 ± 1.55 ** 4.38 ± 1.88 16. Tone 5.83 ± 1.91 6.05 ± 2.07 5.49 ± 1.87 7.18 ± 1.69 ** 5.73 ± 1.85 5.90 ± 1.92 ** 4.61 ± 1.93 ** 7.81 ± 2.11 ** 17. Adaptation and anxiety 5.29 ± 1.95 5.45 ± 1.99 * 4.68 ± 2.06 * 6.67 ± 3.51 * 5.20 ± 1.98 5.38 ± 1.99 ** 3.66 ± 1.97 ** 7.23 ± 2.22 ** 18. Internal and externality 5.88 ± 2.31 6.27 ± 2.30 6.49 ± 1.86 * 5.67 ± 3.51 6.46 ± 2.30 6.36 ± 2.16 ** 8.22 ± 2.05 ** 5.23 ± 2.63 19. Employment Understanding and Security Police 6.01 ± 1.61 ** 5.00 ±
1.80 * 5.43 ± 1.68 ** 6.00 ± 1.85 6.13 ± 1.76 5.54 ± 1.93 * 5.58 ± 1.97 20. Weak and decisive 6.15 ± 1.61 ** 5.64 ± 1.53 6.13 ± 1.53 5.53 ± 2.06 5.93 ± 1.88 6.12 ± 6.30 5.77 ± 1.76 5.47 ± 1.66 ** 21 Mental Health 22.78 ± 5.63 21.96 ± 5.78 * 20.05 ± 5.18 18.60 ± 6.67 * 23.96 ** 27.77 ± 5.87 ** 16.59 ± 6.82 * 22. Professional achievement 53.26 ± 9.46 53.00 ± 9.95 ** 57.73 ± 9.97 ** 51.77 ± 9.98 ** 54.71 ± 10.98 ** 59.71 ± 10.57 ** 46.00 ± 10.77 23. Create capacity 82.20 ± 9.01 ** 78.91 ± 10.98 ** 84.92 ± 8.27 * 74.06 ± 20.28 75.32 ± 9.30 ** 78.86 ± 9.43 79.51 ± 9.58 24. Growth capacity 19.97 ± 4.14 19.34 ± 4.22 ** 21.50 ± 5.64 * 20.06 ± 4.07 19.16 ± 4.23 * 19.97 ± 3.93 21.00 ± 3.86 ** 20.47 ± 4.03 (compared with art "(compared to medical comparison) (compared to medical comparison) (compared with art" (compared to medical comparison) * P <0.05 ** P <0.01
Second, the T inspection of 16PF test results in different professional female college students showed that there were 22 significant differences in 24 personality factors. Among them, medical students are highly scored higher in feature and security, and the liberal arts students are derived, independence, tension, adaptation and anxiety score. Students in the art department in the contractability, intelligent, stability, and strong Sex, excitement, constant sex, dare, sensitivity, fantasy, vital, experimental, self-discipline, internal and external, mental health, professional achievement, creativity, growth ability score. In three professional students, the art department is inclined to have higher or lower scores (see Table 1). Third, comparison with medical students 16PF test as normal groups and neurosis patients show: Male in smart, stability, constantity, worries, self-discipline, tension, adaptation, anxiety, mental health, professional achievement 9 There is a significant difference in factors. Female has significant differences in consolidation, stability, worries, experimental, tension, adaptation, and unconado, and decisive, psychological health (see Table 1). Fourth, the correlation test of two tests showed that the correlation coefficient was distributed at 0.094 to 0.838, R = 0.624, and 23 were significantly correlated in 24 indicators, and the p value was distributed at 0.023 to 0.0001.
Discussion
Raymond B Cattell 16PF has been introduced for more than 20 years, with its intuitive, easy, and effective to be widely used [4]. At present, China's Chinese application has three often models: 1970 Liu Yonghe Dr. Revision (Hong Kong and Taiwan Standard), in 1981, Li Shao Yi, Liaoning Province, Rethemative, Normal Mode of Liaoning Province, 1988 China East Normal University Dai Zhongheng, I wish you a revision (Shanghai University Student Standard). There have been more than ten years from the revision time. The social and cultural environment is significant for the cultivation and formation of personality. my country's self-reform and opening up is especially for more than ten years. Eastern and Western cultural exchanges have frequently exchanged, national values, moral guidelines, lifestyle and behavioral habits have changed. In addition, my country's only child policy and today's parents have a conscious early education and cultural influence of children, and there is no huge and far-reaching influence on the formality formation of contemporary college students [5]. The significance difference between different professional college students in the 16PF personality factors in this study was the diversified trend of the personality of contemporary college students, which not only made a requirement for the current college psychological monitoring tools, but also prompted school mental health. This change should be adapted as soon as possible. This is no report in the past. As a normal group, T test is conducted as an abnormal group in patients with neuropathy, showing smart, poor stability, abnormality, low self-discipline, low degree of treatment, high sense of mental health and professional achievement level, high degree of calmness, high sense of mental health and professional achievements in male neurosis . Female neuropractic patients are low, lonely, poor stability, high anxiety, low experimentality, high tightness and anxiety level, low mental health, suggesting that neurological patients have personality defects or insufficient. This is in line with the past research [6,7]. Reconstruction of 52 college students showed that the stability of Ka 16PF test has basically reached the requirements of the personality test, one of which is not related to the system error, this is related to the past The result is in line with. The significance of psychological testing is representative, reliability, good value, high degree of trial [8]. Changes in the personality factors of college students today have challenged the current 16PF. This study further suggests the need to establish professional normal molds in addition to the advantage of the Ka 16PF test. references
1, Zhang Zhiyong, Luo Shanhong. Comparative Study of College Students' SCL-90 Scale Survey Results. Chinese Journal of Psychological Health, 1998, 12 (2): 77 ~ 78.2, Ma Jianqing. Analysis of the Loss of Students' Psychological Health of China 's Psychological Health. Chinese Psychology Journal, 1998, 12 (1): 57 ~ 59.3, Cao Xiaoping, Ren Baili, Zhao Quanying, et al. Changes in the Camwar's 16PF Trend of more than 20 years. Psychology, 1994, 173: 184 ~ 186.4, Pan Fang , Zongyu, Zhang Hongjing, et al. Comparative study on the characteristics of college students and normal college students. Journal of Shandong Medical University. 1998, 36 (4): 172 ~ 173.5, Chen Zhonggeng, Zhang Yuxin, Personality Psychology. Shenyang: Liaoning People Publishing House, 1987: 319 ~ 343.6, Zou Wenhua, Zhang Honggen, He Xinghu. Social psychological factors, individuality and physical symptoms of neurosis and normal human symptoms. Chinese Journal of Neurological Diseases, 1998, (24) 4: 211 ~ 214.7, Xu Xiufeng. Study on the relationship between personality, life incident and cash with neuroscopic symptoms. Journal of Chinese Psychiatrics, 1996,29 (1): 43 ~ 46.8, Li Xintian. Editor-in-Chief. Medical Psychology. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House, 1991 : 89 ~ 90.
