To be old truth, the last article is written in the last month, those days, I finally figured out where our disciplines should focus on where the study focuses, but still a little blurred, there is no clear definition. Today is the first day of the school, first go to the library, this is good, discovering a book that makes me have each other, I hate to die - Mr. Zhao Zhu (pay tribute) << calculation Scientific Introduction >> Isn't this a book I have been looking for? Clearly expound our learning progress, depth, and breadth in our discipline. The writing skill is very very deep, and there is a kind of vibration and deepening. At least it is like this, and does not say the text, only the preface and the postscript are extracted as follows: For a long time, whether to set the "Calculative Scientific Introduction" courses in the teaching plan, if this course is opened, A series of issues such as how much is arranged, and the focus is concerned, and there are different understandings in the teaching community. According to the progress and experience of calculating the research on teaching content and curriculum system for 21st century, we believe that it is still necessary to open a course in the first semester in the first semester in computational science majors. Considering that the current new students arrange for several weeks of military training, the course of the course is suitable for the treatment of 15-20. In the past two decades, many schools of schools or computing science majors have opened the calculation of scientific introduction courses, and have written, compile and publish several kinds of "computer science introduction >> teaching materials, It is widely used in teaching in higher education institutions. However, as the education community is deepening to calculating scientific education understanding, the deficiencies of the original textbooks have been presented, mainly in two aspects: 1: Most << Computer Science Introduction >> Textbooks are written on the content A concise compression version of the teaching content of the scientific undergraduate (basis) course, did not depart from the issue of universal concern from the first-year student study, on the characteristics, discipline form, historical origin, development, typical method, subject knowledge Organizational Structure and Classification System, the key points of each year, and how to understand problems such as science, learn to calculate the computing science from the perspective of science philosophy and senior science, so it is difficult to play the role of follow-up curriculum; 2: Introduction The content and follow-up courses lack of scientific arguments, but also due to the first-year students lack the basic knowledge of subsequent courses, and the course is too large in the arrangement of hours, leading to a lot of content. Teaching content should be undertaken by other courses (including experimental courses), such as computer operation orders and Chinese character encodings, and some content that should not enter the teaching plan and curriculum system, such as some advanced languages and some database system languages and Application, etc. Some of them is that if necessary, if necessary, it can be natural and easy to learn from the knowledge. It can be seen that writing a new textbook that can truly calculate the role of scientific introduction is an urgent task. This seemingly simple job has always been made upless, and the team has aware of the reasons for understanding, it is highly required by the author.
If there is no overall grasp of the computational scientific discipline history, origin, subject, subject knowledge structure, discipline development law and trend, etc. The book is not easy. This textbook we created is an exploration and attempt to calculate the first-year student of the scientific professional in this context, whether it is appropriate to be inspected. The writing of this book is based on scientific research. For the content of the content, we focus on calculation of some results of the science to the 21st century teaching content and the reform issue of the course system to design various chapters. After referring to a large number of scientific and technical literature at home and abroad, the integrated authors have been engaged in calculating scientific work over the years. The trial textbook of the experience is 15-20 hours. The first chapter to the third chapter is the focus of the course. It is recommended that all the department will choose to conduct scientific, and learn from scientists to teach and use the projector. (Such a teacher, I have never seen @@@) We hope to teach teachers to introduce the main content of the top three chapters to the students in a relaxed atmosphere. The content of the fourth chapter is due to its status of the entire teaching plan and the curriculum system and the time and space of the teaching plan schedule, or may not be learned. Although the contents of the top three chapters are important, but should be self-study by students. The teacher's counseling is supplemented. The reason is that these contents are just a referral role in students. To truly understand their connotation, they can only gradually in the future. carry out. In the case of classroom discussions, the problem that students staying in the top three chapters of the study may be worth a try. Teaching courses echoing with this book can be the first semester computer experiment. In the teaching of the experimental class, students should handle the computer under the guidance of the experimental class, master some simple operating skills, and improve the sensibility. Because students in recent years have differentiated computers in the use of computers, computer experimental courses should pay attention to the application of teaching. All systems should actively write << Computational Science Experiments in the first-year student. We launched a reference directory of some experimental units in the appendix. For some students who have experienced programming experience, you can consider all kinds of popular, important computer software, especially network software. For those students who have never contacted the computer, everything should start from the beginning. It is to be noted that teachers don't have to emphasize students' proficiency in the main content in computational scientific introduction, these are not the key content of the first-year student study. We recommend calculating the scientific introductory and computer experimental course period assessment methods. The content of this book is focused on how to understand and learn how to calculate and learn from scientific philosophy, including the basics of the Boolean number prepared for follow-up curriculum. These contents learn to calculate science well and successfully completed their studies. In the study of middle school students may understand some of the top three chapters inaccurate, not profound, not comprehensive, this is normal, no big strange. However, this book has conclusive views, methods, and understanding of students in mind. This is not only because they are the accumulation of scientific (education) experience, but also with the continuous intensity of learning, the intensity of knowledge will further deepen these perspectives, methods, and help everyone learn to calculate science. Successfully completed the studies. In teaching, conditions can be distributed to calculate extracurricular readers, such as scientific personnel evaluation, and some classic review papers related to computational science. my country's computing science profession has been a few decades, and some experience has accumulated some experience in practice.
From the perspective of running schools in the last decade, many schools, especially in 1985, have established a computer science department, due to many factors such as the level of teachers, and investment in schools, and the understanding of computational science has deviated the computational science. It is mainly reflected in Teachers and students are insufficient to support the basic estimation of calculating scientific development, and the arduous estimation of computational scientific professional learning is insufficient. These two estimates have caused insufficient importance to the basic courses and professional basic courses. It is insufficient to calculate the scientific experimental course. The result is that most school teachers and students regard this technology science as a general engineering. Professional to treat, basic courses and professional basic courses decline in the proportion of basic courses, the teaching depth of basic courses and professional basic courses decline. The teachers and students will put teaching energy into simple in practice and tend to be extension of knowledge expansion, and neglect the objective requirements of the discipline of classroom teaching and experimental teaching, which should go to the road of connotation, and desalinate The learning of basic theory knowledge is ignored, from the actual perspective of theory, strengthen the basic experimental technology of computer, so that talents are biased towant education. (Finally, this 6 words really said in my heart), fundamentally, computing such a talent training tendency to directly threaten my country's computing science research (scientific research and higher education) development and computer industry participation international competition . Computing scientific professional learning is a very difficult labor, and many young scientists and engineers who have grown in recent years have the same feelings. Experience tells us that learning computing science is even more difficult than learning basic mathematics because many theoretical courses are not simpler than math courses, while students should face a lot of practical content, and the knowledge update cycle is very short. The combination of theory and practice, the unity of theory and practice is a major feature of calculation of science. It determines how to convert learning between learning middle school students to constantly transform learning between tight logical thinking and experimental operations. Not a relaxed thing. Not to mention the development of scientific disciplines is very fast, and the supplementation and update tasks of the knowledge organization structure are like Taishan, which will not breathe. It is no wonder that some computing science masters are sigh: "Computational science is the science of young people." This is to say that once you choose to calculate the science as a professional area of your life, it is equal to the road that you have chosen full of thorns, one The road of hard life. A student who is interested in calculating science and development must lay a solid foundation in a few years of study, and it is possible to act in the rapid development of future disciplines, or in the development and rapid update of computer products. Of course, this is described that it is not necessarily to convince the reader, or it should be found in the development and intrinsic law of the discipline itself, so that students fundamentally recognize the importance of learning the basic courses. The writing of the textbook should be implemented to make different levels of readers have the principle of harvesting literary creative, this is the realm of the so-called "deep, shallow people to have their shallow" (master style!). Of course, to do this, not an easy thing, let alone the content of the book only reflect the author's understanding, but only one is just a saying, it is inevitable, it is needed. Description. The author is sincere. . . . . . When writing, the author refers to the number of academic books and literature on home and abroad, but not lists the directory of the literature. This is not the author's contrary to scientific morality, but a college student against all grades. We do not want them to focus on this course, and don't want them to drive the enthusiasm of science and curiosity. It takes a lot of time to read a lot of professional references, because the content of this book is not the first grade of the university, just an introduction.
- Why didn't our school don't open such a course? There are indeed a few people in us, including myself, I have not been there. "There is not enough importance to basic courses and professional basic courses, and the level of attention is not enough to calculate scientific experimental courses"? This book was published in 1997. Why didn't it cause enough attention? It shouldn't be! I don't am not right, "Is it a lot of professional references to read a lot of time for scientific enthusiasm and curiosity? (Of course, what is not to understand) I have to read this book at the beginning of the big, will hang so many lessons, will it be in some technical details? Oh, repentance is late! At the moment, you can only double your efforts and make up the previous mistake. And why didn't I find this book before? Just because I don't often go to the library, I must learn lessons in the future! After later, I have a better understanding of the previous confusion, and I will be extracted again: Postscript (forget, tomorrow, today playing so many words, exhausted)
