see
A good BUG management tool URTracker, just recently, I also have a bug tracking tool, and I also talk about my feelings.
Since the original BUG has been managing in the way of using the Word document, a bug will have a lot of coming back between testers and developers, it is very inconvenient.
So in idle time
Bugtracker.net bungs a bug management system.
Bugtracker.net is also a web mode, and open source, written in ASP.NET, is a mode of the page code and Script code mixed, not common
.Asspx file -.cs file method. Provide common bug management features with mail subscription feature. And the speed is also good, although there are still some problems (mainly in the date of Search, on the user classification of the report), it is Open source, it is very convenient to modify it, and for a small team, it The function provided is also enough. It also provides custom queries and reports and print functions, you can print a bug's details and bug lists, reports provide pie charts, bar charts, line graphs, and lists, I will define several reports now. The number of bugs of each module is displayed, the number of bugs that a person revised, the number of BUG discovered by everyone can have a statistical for the test staff and developers (of course, it does not reflect the workload), and the extension has been added to add tests. The use case module has made Chinese in the original part of the system.
This is still my first use of open source software to implement maintenance work, and I can't help but open source, I can modify and expand as needed.
Let's talk about several similar software considered before using Bugtracker.net:
Ontimer:
There is a CS version and a web version, which is to charge, but it seems to be easier to crack with .Net, I look at it with Reflector, it is easy to find the encrypted place. This software is more detachably complicated than bugtracker.net, and it seems to be not limited to BUG tracking, while tendency to manage. At the same time, it uses components such as ASPNetMenu, and the speed is slower than BugTracker.net.
Bugzilla:
I heard that it is very powerful tool, but I will look down, I want to use mysql, and the code is like being written by Perl (.pm and .pl files written?), Afraid, don't use it.
MyTracker:
Using the Interbse database, there are also two ways of cs and web. I am installing Interbase in the afternoon, ready to see tomorrow, this software looks not only limited to bug tracking, there are other functions, help more, etc.
Mantis:
Based on PHP and MySQL, it will not maintenance, no.
The software listed above is in my essay:
Bug Tracking other friends mentioned in the software.
In general, although Bugtracker.net has a lot of defects, it is the greatest advantage for it with a small team, and it is also easy to maintain and expand.
