present day
Fenng gives me a link on the MSN:
Kamus: Why do I say that Sina is underestimated?
You call not to greet me, this doesn't matter, you don't give Trackback, it doesn't matter (you said you are blog).
But how can you change my title? OK, you haven't matter to my title, but you can see what I wrote before you wrote it before you Copy Paste.
When did I say that the value of Sina is underestimated? !
The value of Sina is seriously underestimated, because the potential of online advertising has not been fully excavated.
this is
Keso's words in his "Sina's value VS grand", and I just expressed different opinions on this sentence.
1. Blog China randomly tampered my article title
2. All Keso in my original text is bold, but the blog China does not have these formats, lack of formats, readers will definitely feel that this buddy is doing, play your own slap? If others are reprinted, say that Kamus's article says: Sina is seriously underestimated, because the potential of online advertising has not been fully excavated. I am then being yellied by others, isn't it my blog China to carry this black pot.
3. The first sentence in my article is, "Keso a new thing:
Sina's value VS grand value ", what do you get to me? If there is no original link, my personal comment is not coming. I know Dr. Fang has some holiday, but don't take my article. You have to reprint all, don't reprint it.
I have never said it before, but today I still have to say: I personally article declined by the blog China!
