Reprinted from CU, author longnetpro
Whether we have learned or give others to solve it, we must have a rigorous and serious attitude. If you have anything, you have to organize, although sometimes not good enough, but the attitude must be the end!
I recently read some domestic technical websites (here mainly discussions related to php), found a lot of problems, and simply talk about personal opinions. First, from the horizontal level, the Chinese articles and foreigners' articles are really large. Many written content is mostly translated from foreign articles (some will have some translation errors), and the domestic original works lack new intentions - basically a thousand articles or change the foreign articles, and there is a large number of reprints, Few people can independently present some different opinions or experience. At the same time, many of these articles is not high - there is a considerable number of articles that are some pediatric practices, there is no too much technical content, not only guiding the guiding significance of beginners, but also mislead some people (of course foreign countries) There is also a part of the article, I will talk about this issue below. It is not emphasized here to be correct, but the information content in their articles is relatively strong, guiding significance and practicality are relatively strong. Second, the analysis of some source code or technical articles clearly can see the huge difference between Chinese and foreigners thinking - Chinese people's thinking and free, there is no system, just take care of themselves, It's finished, it is basically not considering code compatibility, scalability, friendliness, readability, there is no practical value, if you want to use these things, the result is only two: one is just borrowing ideas Then I develop a new set of new (suitable for the master level, but it is likely to be free and broken), the second is that the project is as messy as the code used, the same freely, and there is no compatibility. , Scalability, friendliness, etc. This is true for the article. Most basic thinking about where, although the summary is a summary, but did not make an outline, maybe someone else didn't understand what you are saying (of course, there is The article is also very good, this cannot be disagreeable). For older writing articles, most of them are structures, but in content is a hundred flowers, each family is different, and each article has basically clear opinions, there is a primary, regardless of the author's understanding or idea Wrong or not, he will find some evidence to prove that at least gives the reader a chance to choose and judgment, can also cause the thoughts of beginners, so that they will not blindly, the misleading of the readers will be greatly reduced, and there is a certain inspiration Sex. The domestic article has basically rarely gives a strong evidence. It is convinced that they will judge the author's point of view of the author's point of view, but for beginners, let them don't know the wrong, China When people say, Ning is credible, it is not credible, the result is that some mistakes have influenced a large number of people. The article is still being reprinted by the classic. The author is in the art. The result is "infinite" (said " Whenever a little horrible). For those masters who can judge themselves, his judgment is also relatively blind, because the original text does not have strong evidence, he must use his knowledge to judge, still the same narrow, and no help to others, they don't It will be objected (it does not match the trend). In short, the result is: This type of article does not have much practical value, but also because the mental guidance is relatively poor, learning is not necessarily learning something (whether to learn something, you must see the reader's understanding and acceptance of new things Thinking innovation capabilities), it is also possible to imprison people's thinking, so it is better not to send, it is better to turn.
Third, many articles are not objective, not comprehensive, and lack of timeliness. I have just said that there are many articles that have misleading people in the foreigners, and one of these, one of the main problems is a timeliness, but unfortunately, this is the most easily ignored. Many articles content and viewpoints are only in a specific historical period, and the specific environment and conditions are established (including many classic articles), but most of them are not established under the current situation (emphasize most). However, there is often a repost or publisher who will not consider the actual situation. It will take out the original article in the original text. It is not written. The result is that the technique or method that has tended to eliminate it has been speculated, and for beginners. Words, I can directly accept new content directly, but because of the misleading of this type of article, I found some old things than new use, I will not care about the problem of the old things, because of the greed for giving up new content. It is ultimately the issue that can be avoided or has been gradually eliminated, and it is still constantly being repeated. It has always been cured (because there are always beginners continue to join this ranks). One of the most typical examples is the usage problem of Register_Globals in PHP. There is no exception of a large number of so-called security issues, and the so-called security problem is continuously reproduced. The result is constantly constantly. In fact, this is an outdated problem. The manual and official website have explained that as long as everyone uses a high version of PHP, write code with new ways, it should not have a lot of such problems (note that there is no problem ). Novice has never seen any positive article on the Internet says why it uses $ _GET without variables, but a lot of articles can only lead to security issues, and simply say that you can't do this, and how can you give it? Very few, while the so-called solutions have been outdated, do not apply. From the perspective of ordinary people, if you clearly say something is right, and explain why, he will follow this correct road, such as $ _Get, even if it is lost, more users who have considered more than one He will hit, and the correct point of view has also been established; and another angle, if you don't specify the way, he will only try not to take the wrong road mentioned by the article ("Don't mention it The wrong way "and" The right way to walk "is completely different from the effect, the prior person makes mistakes will be much higher than the latter). Fourth, the article is not the system, the level is different, nor is there there therein, and some articles have a clear problem, but the code has obvious problems, but it is inconsistent, some content name is not realistic or exaggerated, and it is also used, misleading people Big. Some articles explain that it is not truly, only to listen, the problem is not mentioned, and it is extremely harmful. That is, it is not objective and comprehensive. Some people written or translated articles, statements are not available, the syntax is wrong, the punctuation is used, the wrong word (homonym), the typing error is endless. In response to the above questions, there are several suggestions: First, the website needs some technical and business levels or managers, but also have some high level editing (this is not difficult to find, find a few more comparison Empty people are responsible for the moderator, but the level is high, and it is important to be objective. The main job of editing is to modify the wrong word or grammatical punctuation, and have questions about the point of view (indicating that there is obvious mistake or obviously, there is a problem with such problems, don't say that you think there is a question) where you have any questions ( But it is best not to change the text of the original text).
Second, delete an outdated article, or add the solution to remind the reader to pay attention, can't ask. Wonderful or inspiring in the article content, but some views have questions, at this time, it should be prompted or annotated (), and the tone should also be responsible for the labor and copyright of the original author, but must not write a "article content and point of view" Unrelated to the XXX website ", this is not responsible for the reader, because you are a technical website, your responsibility is to spread the latest, correct, valuable technology and thinking, not only to provide everyone to make everyone Not responsible. Third, the original author, the original writing date, the original article is self (if any), the reprinatic, reprint date, reprinted source, etc. should be indicated under the title, which is also respect for the author and the reprinator. Among them, the original writing date is especially important. It must not be not, it is preferred to make a special mark and use a negative text, it is preferred to directly add "this article may have been outdated" words clearly reminded. In addition, be sure to add a prompt to "this article is not authoritative, for reference, please reader self-reliance", try to minimize the possibility of the article on the reader. Fourth, grading articles or classification or both, such as entry-level, ordinary grade, advanced class, expert, etc., classify or according to safety, code, skills, etc. Make the entire architecture clear. 5. Some of the contents of some structures, such as someone released source code, can consider submission pages with special structures: If there is a title section, describe the section, the code section, the description, the skill part, the problem part, summary section, download URL, etc., when finally form an HTML article, combine these partially uniform documentation. This is clear that the reader is clear, but also collects value. For submission of the article, I also have a few suggestions: First, there must be the original author name, the original date (if it is originally submitted, the time is automatically recorded), indicate whether or not the original or reprint, if it reprinted, where to transfer it, It is best to have a URL or a title period. Second, when writing articles, ask yourself, my view is objective, whether it is comprehensive, there is something I am like I am in the article. If you don't objectively, reduce subjective views until you change to objective, if necessary, if necessary, you should add a subjective point of view, it is best to add a sentence. "This is my personal point of view," I only refer to "or" I personally think ... "(The words I often say). If it is not comprehensive, you should modify the central view of your article so that your content is consistent with the topic, making the content. It is likely to be content, if you must write, please indicate "I don't know this" or "I only know one or two, not a thoroughness" or the sentence like I have written "in this I don't have much say, because I am not very understanding. "No one wrote your level because you have a level. Third, the topics and views of the article are summarized. If there is a solution for some questions, it is best to make a positive solution, not just say that you should not be like this (the problem talked about), saying something meaningless. When you give a positive solution or how you should do it, it is best not to push out the detailed steps, but you should go, but the information should be much enough, otherwise it is the same. What is more about? More to let readers form a concept, there is a way to find the final solution. But it is absolutely not to be held for him, or it will cultivate a lazy.
Fourth, the end of the article, if possible, it is best to add this sentence (mentioned earlier): "Personal view, for reference only". 5. The article will be attached to the reference information, or personal acknowledgment, of course, in the case of this information. This is also respect for knowledge and their authors. 6. Check the error. Includes typing errors, punctuation, syntax errors, statement errors, to content errors, logical errors, code errors, illustration errors to the final perspective error. Postscript: My thoughts are basically written. In fact, I have written the article's suggestion is a basic full step in writing an English article abroad. This primary school student wrote that this is basically such a process, but I have added some of my own summary in the suggestion. Foreigners are very guilty, and more content or more content or opinion, you have to delete it. In addition, the foreigners are extremely spell errors and spelling errors and punctuation errors (punctuation is sometimes Fetal errors, and it may be severely deducted in the exam), three large grammar errors, 5% of your article Ten points are gone. One of my real examples, 40 points in Quiz, to write a paragraph of eight sentences, the first sentence is the topic Topic Sentence, the second sentence is Main IDEA 1, this two sentences are no problem, but the third sentence I wrote a Because i .... and then add a number. This is normal in Chinese, I have a view, then "because ...", this is no problem. But in English, Because is a consecutive word, only guided clauses, must have a priority, otherwise it is Fragment, it is a very serious grammatical error, I only have this error, I have not peripated, I was deducted eight points. In fact, there is no problem with a main sentence, such as IT Was ... Because .... Later, I asked again if I only wrote "because ...", just like Chinese, you have to write into this is because .... At that time, it was halo, but there was no similar error. I am not discussing English here, just talking about writing articles, the requirements for language are very high. It may be in China, I don't have to learn Chinese, the result is written by the paper written like kindergarten children, and there is no system. The result also led to not standard thinking. Everyone else did not comply with the norms. Finally, it is a mess, which place is in that place in that place in that place. The local is chaotic. In fact, I have said that many of the similar websites at home and abroad have, foreign countries do not say, domestic large station phpe and Troyoo doing advertising on CU in the previous few days have similar issues. Many articles on PHPE have made the questions I mentioned (of course I don't specifically for PHPE or TROYOO). There are also many source code on phpe, and some are very low, some are not realistic, some are like blowing, some are simply unreasonable things actually downloaded the most digital - Of course I didn't see or don't understand I don't dare to make comments - at least a lot of code I have seen, even half of the problem is there. A typical example, there is a class library on the phpe is ziplib, the author blows out in his instructions, as if solving a big problem, the number of people downloaded is very much, many places reprint recommended, I am I have seen it in Leohack and CTB forum.
However, the actual situation is not the case. I only read it again, I have fully known all his ideas and all the mistakes of his committees, because of his similar functional code, I also wrote a full version. The function is much better than it (formerly sent Shukebeita), his idea I have all thought about it. His mistake I ruled out in the design phase, that is, the same function and operation, his ideas from one I was abandoned by me, and I didn't have any value in my thoughts (I can say this because it is indeed worthless). First of all, he blended the concept of packaging and compression. He didn't use the server to provide a compressed library. It can be compressed is completely wrong. I thought he was high enough to put the compression algorithm to implement the PHP, holding the idea of learning Look at it, look at it, I found that it is just packaged. Is it still not compressed without a zlib library function? Is the Tar in PEAR not to achieve it? The PEAR can also be compressed in the case of zlib valid, and only packaged in the case of invalidation. The most ridiculous thing is that the author defines a package format. You must first write the Windows program written by this machine before use (Linux can't use) first packaging compression and upload it to the Internet with his PHP decompression unpacking, Or after packaging compression on the Internet, use his program to decompress the unpack. There is ready-made Tar, you can engage in a set, and it is not very popular. More serious is that after analyzing the code, it is found that his file format is not well design, you need him to pack all the files into a huge string (all the procedures are operated in memory) can only write it on the disk, not like Tar or TGZ can be packed with compression. So this library is not available at all, using it will only leave endless sequelae in the future. I said that this is not how much higher my horizontal, nor does it say that the author's own level is much lower (it is relatively low), just say, just like phpe, above Many things are very problematic. Many readers come here, and it is possible to make a mistake, which is not good for both sides. Write such a long article, it is also a time, just on Monday, I have a long weekend, it's ok. A few days ago Easychen said PHPE to me, I want to support, I will of course support. But I looked at PHPE, I found a lot of problems, in fact, these problems have long been seen, and they are deeply evergading, but they have never spend the time to write such a long article. I usually think about it, "Chinese people have many virtues (not all), you don't have a mind, willing to be superstitious, you will not analyze, you will not learn is your own problem, you are unlucky, you are misleading my bird ! ", There is therefore no interest in writing my thoughts. However, since this opportunity is, it has also wanted to say, just think of China's study style, writing these will definitely say that you have the wind, what is your cow, therefore, is too lazy. In fact, I don't care, I don't care what others think. In North America, those that I have talked above is a habit, and it is like a monster in China. China's study style I think of it now, I will only shook my head, I don't want to mix it in the university. I only know mathematics and principles. I will not write procedures. The paper will not write.
