Mr. Gui Ming once had a masterpiece "Positive", published in "Wenhui Reading Weekly" (August 30, 2002), the beginning of the "Three Kingdoms Romance" Although a description is very expressive, but "suspicious this is the fictional fictional, put the abdomen so unbearable, living like a monkey ... This can be seen, 'Le is only a Mr. Luo Jun."
The conclusion has not been avoided, in fact it is not for the novelist 's Du, but it is obviously taken from the "Three Kingdoms · 书 · 后 主 主" 裴 裴 注 注 注 文 文 文 文 文 文 文 文 文In this regard, Mr. Wu Xiaru is "Two Questions" ("Wenhui Reading Weekly" September 27, 2002) One of: "The Romance of the Three Kingdoms" has been based on Liu Chan, said it There is an artwork ingredient, saying it is a novelist fictional, is nearly in depth Zhou Na. "" Gui Wen argument is very visible, and the beginning is inevitably referred to as Bai Gui. "
The discussion of this incumbent question is to end, and Mr. Huizhen is quite unbelieved. I only admit that my article is just a "negligence", I believe that Mr. Wu said, "Deep Wen Zhou" and "Bai Yanzhi" Obviously, it is important (see "Wenhui Reading Week" "Answer Wu Xiaoxiang Mr." on October 25, 2002). Alas! What is it? Stealing, "Deep Wen Zhou" is close to the words, and "Bai Guzhe is gone" is difficult to blame. Fu Baizui is a man, the white jade is also. Mr. Wu's advice is very sincere. Even if it is calculated as a criticism, it is very good, and Mr. Gui is not polite, and it is still very ridiculous to think that the shortcomings of their own articles are than "Bai Gui." I don't know why is it so confused? The consequences of negligence, there is a lot of small, and the big people can "the whole army", and the "negligence" of Guiwen is similar to such negligence. Obviously this is a negligent "negligence" - Imagine if the purpose It is false, can the conclusion still stand?
As everyone knows, reading is generally read, this is the minimum method problem, let alone the "Three Kingdoms" of Zeong Song's note compared to the general history of history, it is more special value, its information is rare and the information is rich, Supplementary "Three Kingdoms" is a lot of deficiencies, so they can't "neglect" not reading, so they have pointed out this point from Zhang Tai Yan to Mao Zedong (see "Guangming Daily" on December 20, 1993), otherwise It is difficult to write articles related to the research of "Three Kingdoms", which is one aspect. On the other hand, if you don't have read the Note, you know that there is "Han Jin Chunqiu" record, why don't you pay attention to this information and reference and research? It is clear that some people have pointed out this, but they are not willing to accept it, this is even more incredible.
The above two questions are just the cases, I am very reluctant to say that the author will have a method of reading and an attitude of learning. However, from Mr. Wu and Gui, I have made me think that it should be a "Three Kingdoms", the historical authenticity of the "Three Kingdoms", which is the "key" of the topic we work together.
Zhen Song is "Three Kingdoms" for the Song (South Dynasty) Yuan Jia for six years (429), when he left Chen Shou to live more than 130 years. The information quoted by the removal is mostly the work of the Wei Dynasty, and more than 200 kinds. The information on these references shall be taken in accordance with its "three national emotions>", "the" Shou Dynasty "is: First," Shou is not contained, the registrarist, then it is not taken to make up its "; Second, "The same is true, or there is a distant thing, the problem can not be sentenced, and it is copied to the insight." Third, "I am obviously, if the words are unconscious, then the violation is corrected "; Four," Whether the current situation does not have a small loss of life, it is quite foolish. " As can be seen from these four processing methods, Yan Song is quite cautious about the referenced information, and always pays attention to its starting point. In the first quarter of "Han Jin Chunqiu", Yan Song did not bet indicate its defamation and corrected or discovered it. It can be seen that its historical material is basically trusted. Then, from the comparison of the historical materials and Fan Wei "Han Shu", such as Yuan Shao, Yuan Shu, Liu Tu, Lu Bu, etc. In addition to the detailed, there is almost no different, thereby visible to the authenticity. E.g:
The Emperor of Han Dynasty was in the second year (191) Winter, Yuan Shao and Gongshun were fighting in Guangzongjie Bridge. The Ministry of Ming will lead the army to eight hundred, strong thousands of people, and the unlocking of the martial arts. Shande has broken, so he is a saddle. It is not the equipment, only ten strong tens of strong, and the big man guards. I accidentally scattered two thousand rides, the number of rounds was heavy, and the rain was as heavy. The Shanda is a field to escape from empty, and Shao Yu is in the sky: "The husband is currently fighting, and the evil is evil in the wall." It has prompted the 弩, multi-shooting. I don't know if it is, I quite retracted. Will we welcome, and ride, you will be free.
This history, "Three Kingdoms · Wei Shu, Yuan Shai" noted that there were about 400 words before and after "Heroes", and "Han Han · Yuan Shao List" also describes this history, and the information is obviously from the former. And the incidents of the narrative, the characters and their language are exactly the same, and they can only be different (the latter only use 250 words). This can be seen in the value of the historical material. This category is a lot, and it is subject to save space.
Of course, this is not equal to the "Three Kingdoms", but there is no negative effect due to the author's "ignites", such as "quite injury", "chisel", etc. In this regard, the "Siku" total book is checked "," Search "," allore "," column for transmission "," all ten, unrelated to this, " Habilated, seeing the phenomenon. In fact, the author passes through the rough or billed school, and this type of situation is far more than 10 more than "Wu Shu", there are 7 "Search". In addition, "Shi Book First Master", "书 · 竺 传 传", "Wu Shu Dai Shi", "Wu Shu · Wu Fong Chuan", etc., all the introduction of Ge Hong "Shenxian Biography" (this is " Summary "all described). "书 · 主" 引 "本 纪" "武 都 有 is a woman, the color is beautiful, Gaoshan essence is also" "Wu Shu, Lu Yuri", "Jiaoguo" " Therefore, there are four feet of the East China Sea, and the shrimp is four feet, and it is reflected in the deduction, repairing the service ", and the book" Yue Book "," Bozi ", etc. . However, on the one hand, in more than 200 kinds of cents and near the "Three Kingdoms" righteous history, these basically can't have its historical value; on the other hand, the nature of the citation is different, and it is more unconventional as a class. Just as the "Summary" evaluation: 注 "Net Roof, all the old noodles, the people who do not pass this, Shangyi see them slightly. There are many tailings, not like the" water ", Li Shan's "Wen Wen" is cutting the text. Therefore, the home of the admission is inexhaustible. Among them, the maximum number of "Three Kingdoms" of the first number of Luo has been transferred; - the more important is "Transparent Export", and the so-called "fiction" or "Du". Draft selection: Tangying Hao Source: China reading weekly Author: Xu Zongwen
