Big dog
.NET "It is difficult" to achieve a cross-platform sex like Java has been released: 2004-12-11 8:05 pm
I saw a post on the Internet two days, probably: Java will be the most important cross-platform programming solution for a long time in the future, and the thunder is less than a small rain. Net is not so unable to go. Actively realize cross-platform. I think it is very reasonable. Although .NET is known to implement cross-platform, but this is just a surface article, once .NET implements a cross-platform, it is likely that Microsoft will lose thousand in the operating system platform. Microsoft development on the surface. Net is a market share with Java, and in fact, he is a robbery to control the app, attract and draw more programmers to put .NET, let them use .NET cross-platform Dream, and reality can only develop applications for Windows that can be used only, the more people developing the Windows application, the more stabilizing the status of Microsoft in the operating system. Just as Microsoft said: "It is not possible, but not willing." On the contrary, once a cross-platform is supported, it is not much different from the grave grave, and the programmer will "moderately love" with the rapid development of the UNIX system of Linux. How can the savvy Gates do this stupid thing? Java is positioned in freedom at the beginning, through the real cross-platform to achieve the dream of how many programmers. Although now there is a project called Mono now, it seems that it has developed to version 1.0. His purpose is to achieve .NET cross-platform, but now it seems to be "limited" support C #, under the strong press of Microsoft, I don't know what he can develop. Therefore, Java is likely to support cross-platform, and .NET and I don't know what year, and I don't know what year, along with QT, WXWINDOW. - [1; 33M ※ Source:. Trust, true, BBS http://bbs.tju.edu.cn [From: 211.81.54.142] [m
J2SE 6.0
Re: .NET "It is difficult" to achieve a cross-platform sex like Java has been released: 2004-12-13 12:27 pm
Reply, .NET spans only the hardware platform used by Windows and WinCE. I feel that Microsoft has a very technical, and people do cross-platform things have to cross existing platforms. It is to do things. It is a platform for himself. What platforms have to be a platform for others? , Then use money to revitalize your platform ... Microsoft is only good in the market and user experience, technology is not strong. WXWIDGETS / WXWINDOWS is really good, although there is still something that can't be implemented, but it is already very good [mentioned in the masterpiece of DRGNG (big dog):]: I saw a post on the Internet in the first two days, probably: ::: Java will be the most important cross-platform programming solution for a long time in the future, and the thunder is small. Net is not until there will never take the inter-platform. :: I think it is very reasonable. Although .NET is known to achieve cross-platform, but this is just a surface article. Once .NET implements a cross-platform, it is likely to cause Microsoft to lose thousand in the operating system platform. Microsoft developed on the surface. Net is a market share with Java, and in fact, he is a robbery to control the application, attracting and drawing more programmers put .NET, let them do:? .NET cross-platform Dream, and reality can only develop applications for Windows that can be used only, the more people developing the Windows application, the more stabilizing the status of Microsoft in the operating system. Just as Microsoft said: "It is not possible, but not willing." : On the contrary, once a cross-platform is supported, it is not distinguished from the graves of the grave, and the programmer will "moderate love" with the rapid development of the UNIX system of Linux. How can the savvy Gates do this stupid thing? : The Java is positioned in freedom at the beginning, through the real cross-platform to achieve the dream of how many programmers. Although now in the Linux world has a project called Mono, it seems that it has developed to version 1.0. His purpose is to achieve .NET cross-platform, but now it seems to be "limited" support C #, in Microsoft's strong press Next, I don't know what he can develop. :: ................... - [M [1; 34M ※ Source:. Trust, BBS bbs.tju.edu.cn. [From: 202.113.13.188] [M cola
Re: .NET "It is difficult" to achieve a cross-platform sex like Java has been released: 2004-12-16 6:20 pm
Reply huh, bad, not this, but Microsoft is the super easy to use it, a lot of things is the copy of others, but because Microsoft has let more people understand and apply someone else. Use something [mentioned in the masterpiece of MUSTANG:]: Like, .NET across the hardware platform used by Windows and WinCe. : I feel that Microsoft has a very technical, and people do cross-platform things must cross existing platforms. It is a set of things across his own, and there are fewer platforms than others. Platform, then use money to revitalize your platform ...: Microsoft is only good for the market and user experience, technology is not strong. WXWIDGETS / WXWINDOWS is really a very good, although there is still something that can't be achieved, but it is already very good: [mentioned in the masterpiece of DRGNG (big dog):]:: On the top two days a post, probably Means :::: Java will be the most important cross-platform programming solution for a long time in the future, and the thunder is small. Net is not until there will never take the inter-platform. ::::::: I think it is very reasonable. Although .NET is known to implement a cross-platform, but this is just a surface article. Once .NET implements a cross-platform, it is likely to cause Microsoft to lose ten thousand miles in the operating system platform. Microsoft developed on the surface. Net is a market share with Java, and in fact, he is the manufacturing of the app, attracts and draws more programmers to put .NET, let them do: (below) ..) - [1; 32m ※ Source:. Tianshi truth bbs http://bbs.tju.edu.cn [from: 202.113.13.188] [mxinyingjun
Re: .NET "It is difficult" to achieve a cross-platform sex like Java has been released: 2004-12-17 8:44 pm
Reply .NET has already implemented a cross-platform. Mono for .NET has been able to cross n multiple platforms Windows / Linux / Mac OS2 / UNIX, etc., you can listen out, basically cross. I have been in Linux After Mono For .NET. Source code for me in Windows with Microsoft .NET Framework, basically do not change, just re-compile it with MCS, you can run. - [1; 35m ※ Source: . Tianshi truth bbs http://bbs.tju.edu.cn [from: 211.81.53.99] [m
xinyingjun
Re: .NET "It is difficult" to achieve a cross-platform sex like Java has been released: 2004-12-17 8:46 pm
Replying to many people's concept is deeply rooted, it is difficult to break. It will not really study, and the road is listening. - [1; 35m ※ Source:. Tianshi truth bbs http://bbs.tju.edu.cn [from: 211.81.53.99] [m
Dream speler
Re: .NET "It is difficult" to achieve a cross-platform sex like Java has been released: 2004-12-18 10:46 pm
Reply to agree, do not agree. In fact, I am quite sad today, not only because I lost 2X in QQ game card, but not only because I and PM gambling swear to give him a job in Tuesday, I haven't written a eyebrow, not just because I am I am crying as when I am school. . . I just think that I have throw away too much time like everyone, not reading, but not. . . Read too much, now look, very sad. Just like. . . The same is the same as those downstairs. We all have a little saying. Really, no matter what people are talking, they are all. I am very embarrassed, I never look at the books other than C when I go to school, and I don't even have seen ISO98 book. Very shame, I have been using Visual C 6.0. Because I thought C is equally equal to MFC & OWL (VCL), why, if you have seen modern C design (like "moden c design", you can't remember, use the template Pattern library, gave gamma95 The words of a slap in the face). At that time, Template is the container template for me, and it is nothing. Today, you go to see the standard library (original boost), even look at Loki ..., the reason is to guide, I only know with C & , it seems to be "unreasonable, unreasonable "The same. And we all know that C # is Microsoft's development, but I don't know the existence of Mono. I don't know wherever Visual Studio.net, what else can develop .NET procedures. In addition to the Windows platform, do you also get .NET elsewhere? ? So, people say that Java can cross the platform, because Sun said. And people say that .NET can get the best performance and cost ratio on the Windows platform, because Microsoft said this. However, everyone knows that JRE does have differences on the Linux platform and the Windows platform, and Microsoft's Framework also has a problem, especially in VC7. And these are SUN and Microsoft have no propaganda. More importantly, how many people have we written by Lisp? In addition to writing AutoLISP to AutoCAD twice. So, how many people have Python and Ruby? ? Is artificial intelligence really mysterious? Is it really cumbersome of code yourself to control your own behavior? ? What is the lamda function? ? Is it really Java's feat? ? Is the intermediate language layer really integrate the Microsoft epoch? ? Do you have a quick sort of three lines? Moreover, performance is better than using Java. Therefore, people in the school must learn dynamic language is definitely a good idea. And it is something that is not recommended to you, that is the content of freedom. More wisdom and knowledge, less technology and engineering. Of course, the software engineering is definitely unsightly. If you want to mix in the software industry, what iso, cmm, cmmi, what to do, to know the process, to understand the importance of process management. It is necessary to understand the relationship between the nine graphs of UML. I don't mean that these are not important, but said, as a student, it should be big in the eyes. So much above, that is, C # can cross the platform. Prejudice is destroyed.
Humans can reproduce the following ways, MONO, according to I know is open source project. If I remember, please slightly the following text. And what I want to say is that everyone remembers the JRE written by IBM yourself? ? In addition to IBM yourself, there is my notebook (because it is IBM, so it is called this name). Enterprise users use Java because Sun's license or JDK pays certain responsibilities. Thus, everyone dares to use it, and. Net's clone mono is the Open Source of No Warrent. So, if there is a problem, who is it? If you are a software company, do you dare to use Mono to be worried about your customers? ? Do we really have the same behavior of Mono and the same analysis of .NET Framework? Even if you do, can you convince the customer? ? Microsoft will definitely not be responsible for Mono! In addition, .NET adds a new function, can MONO catch up in time? ? Java's popularity depends on all the versions of the Sun sync cross-platform, and Mono Community certainly can't join Microsoft! Therefore, I always feel that this kind of thing is "strategic role is far more than the tactical effect", as if there is always a misunderstanding in our country, think we have something, such as aircraft carrier, one to two high-performance aircraft Once we started war, they will be put into production and equipment forces immediately. However, the equipment is good, can it make? ? Can there be tactical effect? ? Just watching the plane landing aunt, can you immediately land yourself on the aircraft carrier? ? I don't believe, what about you? ? Really high business complexity, hate the MIS of the dead machine, or the technical complexity is quite high and hate the RTS of LAG, using Mono to transcend cross-platform? ? Do you have courage? I think, all companies that still want to mix, there is no. In summary, continue learning, continue to confuse, continue depressed, continue! If you want to be a programmer, in addition to learning the machine, compile, discrete, compilation, etc., as well as Pattern, IDiom, UML, CMM, "Myth Man-Month", quickly develop ten myths (), etc. Forget, don't forget! Find a girlfriend first, because when you become a Programmer, you can see girls, or have been married, or ugly! . I am like this now. [In the masterpiece of xinyingjun (xinyingjun):]: .NET has enabled cross-platform.: Mono for .net has been able to cross n multiple platforms Windows / Linux / Mac OS2 / UNIX, etc., you can list It is basically cross. I have used Mono for .NET in Linux. I will take me in Windows to use Microsoft .NET Framework compiled. Source code is taken under Linux, basically no change, just use MCS to recompile You can run it. - [m [1; 31m ※ Source:. Trust, BBS bbs.tju.edu.cn. [From: 220.194.85.87] [M Ghost
Re: .NET "It is difficult" to achieve a cross-platform sex like Java has been released: 2004-12-19 12:14 pm
