"If you don't know what you are discussing, then" John Von Neumann "
The intention of this book may be to enable readers to "know" software needs. With the continuous development of development language and development tools, simple software writing is becoming more and more easily, and then, people want to use software to handle more complex matters, this requirement is increasing, It has become the most critical part of the success or failure of the project. However, how can we get the correct demand? We have just started exploration, there is a lot of shortcomings, the first book lists some of the aid of demand and obtaining unreal demand through the problem, making me feel I am very surprised, I look back to see what I have done, I can say that there is a big extent, and even worse, I have never realized the existence of the problem. In the back of the book, the author gives the way to collect demand, because it has not been truly applied to practice, now just learning, can't say anything.
Another feature of this book is a very good psychologist. I have written some books about programmers. In this book, the author is very good for us to analyze the psychological and demand collection of customers. Suggestions from the perspective of human nature make these recommendations to have strong targeted and feasibility. We must also have a good care of the customer's psychology when we collect demand, and reasonably avoid some of their psychological misunderstandings. This book also has a strong reference value in this regard.
After reading it, there are still many places that I can only write my feelings. Welcome friends who are interested in this book to discuss learning.
BTW, there is the following words:
Production
State
?
Not, but
Develop
The process is everything.
Document
?
Not, but
Compose
Document
Pass
The process is everything. "
Such
Several appearances in the book
,guess
Measurement
Might
Say
Determine
Produce
Good product, so
Pass
Cheng is important,
full
Be full of
Pass
The process will get
Produce
Product.
It is also said that the process of participating processes has mastered the necessary knowledge. I don't understand it.
