By reasoning, a book is launched, first meet the needs of all hunger readers, so sales is fully imagined. Then, the long flow of fine water is also fully understood. However, many good books are only not good enough because of the time of the book (did not catch up with the big boom in three or four years ago, but it took the big occurrence of these two years) was cold; or it thought that it can be long for a long time but only lost. There are three possible factors:
The reader is not yet mature, and it is also in the stage of the cloud. It is still a stage of "buying the money like a seed." I have not established the brand concept, and I have not been introduced to the next, next generation readers. The publisher level is not enough, and it is not possible to push the book to the reader. Sitting in the wind, I don't know how to face the wind, facing the true competition. That is to say, in the case of market chaos (large occurrence), the publisher has not clearly clears the readers to clear product characteristics and product information (or publisher's products are not known to readers.). The mainland readers have accumulated the complaints and energy of computer books, and in three, four years ago, the high-end external book is quite introduced. There is a peak of buying, naturally there will be the bottom of the valley; the peaks are more and more, and the more highlights the depth of the valley. The existing book is crazy and the introduction has continued to this day, and the mink is also in, the dog is also in, the mink is slow, and the dog is increasing.
In the face of the reality of "classic good books in various fields", my mood is more worried. This doesn't matter with my personal / translator's identity, but as I know that almost all classic good books (original, Chinese translation) are not introduced in the same way: Contemporary Technical Youth What? Or don't you read it? At the same time, the total print of the single textbook exceeds a million volumes, millions of books, and the news of hundreds of thousands of films are also smelling. This is China's life superstar? Still a word, a single value, due to the quiet performance of the change I refer to the intervention of textbooks, as well as the teaching inertia of college teachers themselves (inert).
I mention the so-called high-end technical books, I also have some own opinions, I don't know if I can respond to your question. I think the market in high-end technical books has been obviously more closer to the industry, which field is prosperous, and demand is strong. For example, J2EE and Web development are still mainstream, so J2EE, Struts, and ASP.NET books have good performance. Conversely, some applications have no practical development, such as .NET WinForm development, related books are not so popular. This is different from the previous year. When "deep-in-depth MFC" and "C Primer" hot, many readers are in the mentality of improving their ability and realm, and the purpose is in its second. The current programmer seems to be more pragmatic. This requires the publisher when making the topic planning, more understanding of the actual status of the domestic software industry and the actual psychological state of the programmer group, not just with the past sales figures and abroad. As far as I personally, I still believe that the programmer should have a strong desire to improve, like the "in-depth understanding of computer systems" and "interpretation and construct of computer programs", if there is time, it should be read. The software industry in the Mainland, the cold and thermal dividing trend in the past year is obvious. Hot, mobile, game-related fields are hot, and the software related to the robust industry has grown steadily, and the manufacturer of general software, platform software is very few, and mostly rely on the country's support. I have long heard that many people choose books are not selected, and they read the book regardless of the author. This is really awkward. Note that the author is the best instruction of book quality. Hou Jie: I am very concerned about the technical level of technology, in me, due to work nature and positioning relationship, everywhere is ubiquitous, nowhere. I am more thoughtful and organized to publish the truth, I only know that everyone is willing to listen! Yes, this year I have half a time to return to and from the red dust and the mountains. In the mountain, there is no fish and shrimp, and "" I'm leaning alumni, the peak of the Yuman Building, who is sitting, Mingyue Breeze, ". It is not specially practicing life, purely only to put down the exhaustion of the accumulation, and is not willing to chase the world that is better than last year. However, an inadvertent arrangement really made me feel the power of nature to people's hearts, and important to cultivation. Going to middle-aged, life has some achievements, and work is completely independent, sometimes it will be burnout, sometimes it will be complacent, sometimes good and evil to suspend footsteps, then you need to re-provo the value and positioning, re-stimulating Ling Yunzhi. When the majestic Central Mountains rushed to the eyes, when the thrilling 皓 皓 明 明 明 我 山 山 山 山 山 山 山 山 山 山 山 山 山 山 山 山 山 山 山 山 山 山 山 山 山 山 山 山 山 山 山 山 山 山 山 山 山 山 山 山 山 山 山 山 山 山 山As Meng Ran said, most of the people are in the world, it is difficult to have such a chance. "Great hidden in the city" is not the realm of ordinary people. However, everyone can still create their own quiet environment and is not difficult. You can take yourself in the temporary, put it in the campus, street, and lane. Simple "Three provinces every day" can bring excellent results. In the young years of Huan Pedong Terraite, it seems that simple self-provincial efforts will make you unlock. Telling the public emotions of the technician, immediately let me Lenovo "30-year-old phenomenon" and "where to go" two big. "30-year-old phenomenon" is a group of groupual impetuous, which is purely based on excessive fast expansion. Due to the former uncall, you can't see the model, so you are anxious. But may wish to think about the development of foreign countries, it is a possible future. We can't take "programmers" to do pure "write program code", we should want to become "software developers."
A person certainly should not be 20, 30, 40, 50 years old to write the same level of code, do the same level of work, then there is no longer grow, but the technology is absolutely able to go to the end, to suffer from Azheimerism (Old people's ignorance). "Where to go, there is a confusion of any era, and the degree is precise. We may wish to extends to "seek VS. Ask for Guang" topics. Mr. Hu said: "For learning as a pyramid, you must be able to have a wide range of energy," Highly divided social needs is special, so we should first "seek". I said to Meng Ran. "Faced with a slopes of the slump" is true, I don't joking. But I am actually worried, because I know my own base, I am going fast. This is just "not", "and" when ". I have been deeply affected, and you can reflect value here. A data can reflect the idea of young people. According to the "World Magazine" (Taiwan's well-known magazine, discussing political affairs, cultural education, society) at 2004/05, the value of the value of 18 ~ 35 years old (62.5% is the office worker) found that "is asked" What is the condition that many people stand out? "Many people have made such choices (check, up to three):" Can adapt to change "account for 89.2%," Can work with people "accounting for 67.5%," Can handle unknown "Accounting for 51.2%," there is a skill in the length "accounting for 50.6%," "There is a home background" accounting for 11.4%, "" High education "accounts for 05.8%. In other words, many people want to "adapt to changes" so that "stand out in the future". "Can adapt to change" is easy and "Knowledge" is equal, but it should not be the case! You have deeply dried a school, make a speech, you can easily touch bypass, but more easily "adapt to changes" than the average person. Of course, the change in 100,000 miles is unable to touch by, but there is very little change in life, and you have rarely make the change in technology road. Therefore, in the bustling five-door technology, weak water three thousand take a scoop is enough for us to make a life. Meng Ran said very well: Any road walked down and eventually got. I just have a topic, I want to add a little. Young friends want to "stand out in the future", most of them have to see if they meet the requirements of society. Our age, as a management class, take the interview mark, "We value what" to young friends. I will give an example, in a speech of Harvard Institute, I have an employment of the Shen Buffettt, and he answered three conditions: First, honest and intelligent personality, the second is smart, the third is Have vitality. After that, he added: If a person does not have the first character, then the second is not important. What do I want to emphasize? Expertise and talent is the key to entering the workplace, and the quality is more. Although the character is not able to look at it at a glance, I will see my heart for a long time. It is impossible to have a good development on life roads? It is only one more time. Talking about the quality, talking about honesty, there is another data for the aforementioned survey: "What do you think is honest? The first thing is "Dare to face his own defects" (77.1%), the second is the "dare to express your desire" (17.0%), ranking third is "no foot, two boats" (02.1 %), Ranking fourth is "Dare to reveal the falseness of others" (02.1%), ranking fifth is "Examination is not cheat" (01.8%).
