A supervisor's true confession
I worked for 27 years, in 18 years in business, but from the work over a year, I will be a supervisor, from the person a few people have arrived to dozens of people, to hundreds of people.
But I truly realize that I am a supervisor, and it is really a supervisor and is the last 13 years. In other words, I did a 14-year executive in the mistake, which didn't know how much? How many youth is wasted? How many roads have you gone?
Fortunately, my entry is very special, I am a reporter, working in the country's most influential newspaper. Therefore, when I raised, commanding news interviews, intense media ecology, and automatically letting every reporter go all out, supervisor every day. What you need is required: incentive, coordination, training, etc., the reporter will be automatically completed, do not need me to pay attention to this.
I have been in my business, I feel difficult, I don't know how to build a team, I don't know if I choose to train, I don't know incentives, I don't know how to coordinate, I don't know how to appraise. Even if I even swear, I wanted to teach and correct a part. After half an hour, this person was so happy - he thought I was praise him!
I know that my problem is big. I started working hard, I know that I don't see it automatically, they need education, training, standardization, incentive, and hidden problems in organizational teams, which requires directors. Kung Fu is done.
I have been working hard for 5 years. In the wrong mistake, I have paid countless tuition fees. I finally learned as a head of the company. I learned the difference between workers and supervisors. The company I started. Edge, slowly floating water, gradually improve. I know afterwards, all because I won't be a supervisor, I will not manage, I have harmed myself, harm the organization, harm the company, wasted money, missed youth and false consuming time!
First wrong: I have worked hard
The first mistake I made is working hard to do things, forgot to let the ministry do things.
I am a person who can do. After the supervisor, I misunderstood the truth of "the first-year-old pawn", and I always have a first-priced, I will continue to do myself. I think my efficiency, 10 things, I have 5 pieces, other people only 5 left, everyone should be grateful to me. Coupled with some things, others are really not too doing, I think that it is not good to give them to them, I am still good, it is better to do it directly. In this way, I am busy with ants on the hot pot, but things still don't do it.
Until I want to clearly, the supervisor is to let everyone do things, with everyone's results, I am determined, unless there is no need to do it yourself, things have changed, I got a conclusion, I also became the new executive of my education, I also became the new executive of my education: Terms of the new executive of our education: Call others do things, don't do it yourself. The good executive is: Drinking tea reading newspapers, governing the big country, such as cooking, collecting the completion of the work.
The second error: I think everyone has automatically spontaneously
The second mistake I made is that I am a self-love person. I hate someone to say me, I also assume that others will automatically spontaneously, do everything, I will not swear, I don't want to swear, the top is more only a roundabout Sustsence.
This is the reason for the previous joke, I am determined, and I've said about his question, then I have said a lot of affirmation, afraid that he is uncomfortable, but the problem is precipitated, and he thought I was sure him, and I still don't know how Is good. The truth of the truth is that someone automatically spontaneously, some people are self-disciplined, and some people have incorrect, need to positively specification. My friendliness is considered to be "abusers" that is considered to be unknown. Good people are dead, and they are born, bad people are lucky, still me, the result is inferior coin expelled.
After I am experiencing, things are completely changed. I remember to learn a word when I see the "Kangxi Emperor" in the second month: "Thunder's rain, all the emperor", I know that the reward and penalty is an important tool. Now, I ask the normative part, you can't tell you, from suggestion, to say that it is said that you will be angry, it will be.
The third wrong: I don't know if I don't know.
My third error is I don't know how to give it orally. This is also related to the character of me "don't like others." I have confident, I don't care about others. The problem is that I also assume that others don't need excess "mouthful", as long as the assessment in salary is fair.
Once, a very capable colleague told me: I have never sure what he did, let me be shocked, because the truth is not the case, he is worthy of affirmation, and I have never opened.
Since then, I know that the supervisor's gold mouth is more important. "Love him to say it", not just a good thing must be sure, even if there is progress, it is still not good enough, it must be sure, because people are in motion, Quickly study growth, caterky training is not the core spirit?
The fourth wrong: ignore the assessment, hate the assessment
I don't like to be evaluated, especially when workers are always treated unfair, so when the supervisor, I hate the assessment, but I deliberately ignore the assessment.
I believe that the two eyes are seen, and do the right relative evaluation of all workers as much as possible, the question is to work hard, I will forget a lot of things, especially when people want to get more, more time (more than 20 people), in fact, the evaluation you see in your eyes has begun to distort, you will not see many silent unopened workers, at this time, an objective assessment method is needed.
Don't be self-optimistic, smart people can't see those efforts, but they are not smart.
The fifth error: will not be a referee
Good executive must make a "one plus one more than two" benefits, so the team is very important; and the first step in harmony, not letting the internal do not fight, but the rules, let the dispute can be Constraints and guidance, and the supervisor is this law enforcement, it is a referee.
During my business, usually use less manpower, so things are not good, and the lack of manpower is the biggest excuse. I rarely thought that the performance of the team's internal interaction is not good. It is the reason why it is.
"There is a three-seat balance, unreasonable three", each hitting 50 big board is a normal thing I have in the past, and when the dispute happened, I always hope harmony, and the people who are wrong are not unfair, and the results Of course, how can an internal debit are frequent, how can I play a good team coordination?
It is unclear, it is the style of my present, and when the referee whistle, I will never hesitate!
The sixth wrong: I like smart people, the team is high
My colleagues know that I hate three kinds: "Stupid, lazy, slow", theoretically, these three people are not easy to survive in my organization, which also caused the imbalance in our organization, the team membership High configuration, ecological imbalance. In fact, the high-efficiency team should be a pluralistic combination. Some people do, and the smart approach is also used, and I look forward to everyone is a smart person, the action is fast, the result is some thoughtful, slow people With hate, this is the sixth error I made.
The seventh mistake: the care department, forget the boss
Perhaps it is a weak person. In the course of the competent, I have always standing on the side of the employee, with their role, position, and forget the existence of the boss and the organization.
Once the boss has a conflict of interest, I usually defend the interests of the employee, especially in the beginning of the entrepreneurship, I even forgot that I am the credit, as long as I can't give the worker better treatment, I will suffer, the result is that the company's operation Bundry is more heavy.
This should also be a problem that most of the supervisors, living in the forehead, with the initiative of the workers, and neglect whether the organization's business capability can be burdened.
Later, I made adjustments, the supervisor is "the representatives of both parties", sometimes the labor, sometimes in the parties. In the heart, you have to choose the correct choice, so that the upper and lower balance can be balanced. "Foreman" and "The dog of the boss" is not the right position.
The eighth wrong: I don't know the supervisor is professional, forgot to learn.
I have a lot of mistakes, but the last mistake I used "I thought that the supervisor is a conscience, I don't know if I don't know my heart."
In fact, the supervisor is a major. He needs a variety of different professional skills. He needs the correct attitude. He is responsible for the success of things, and he affects the destiny of workers. However, most of the supervisors are actually promoted by a professional skill, or financial or business ..., once they are promoted to the supervisor, all difficulties occur. Unfortunately, there is no competent training in the enterprise. There is no "supervisor" in the college. Everyone is in the exploration, trying to complete the study.
I took a 14-year-old society, and I only know that "supervisor" is fine and professional division. However, if I "know it early", in fact, I can have small success in a year, I can graduate two years, I don't need to take this way.
