Moderator's words
Last weekend, more than one million candidates registered in the 2005 National Master's Admission Unified Examination. According to the "2005 National Recruitment Master's Graduate Student Brief", the graduate admission process, and the ideological and moral assessment will not be admitted. Despite the relevant people of the Ministry of Education pointed out that the postgraduate reassessment is not the new requirements of this year, but reiterated for many years, the provisions are still "a stone to arouse thousands of waves", which has triggered a wide concern of society. .
Postgraduate admission should not take a moral assessment, how to assess?
The assessment must be perfect
Peking University Zhao Jia
The ancients said, "Know the book". In today's society, many unethical behaviors happen on people with higher cultural levels, this should benefit the knowledge of society, but it is used to use the discipline, which is a very sad thing. As a candidate who participated in this year's postgraduate entrance examination, I felt that there is also a need for a moral assessment in the postgraduate process - it is a signal for the moral construction of the whole society. It is actually a positive guidance for candidates. .
Of course, to achieve practical results, postgraduate moral assessment needs to establish a reasonable standard and feasible assessment. I think the quality of the graduate admission cannot be set too high. The threshold is too high, will lose practical significance. For general graduate students, the moral assessment should have two basic points. First, it is necessary to obey the law, and the other is to integrity.
In addition to setting the appropriate standard, the moral assessment should also pay attention to two questions: First, it is necessary to establish an effective moral evaluation system. The moral appraisal should be available. This requires our school to improve the daily behavior assessment system of college students, so that the graduates can make the current performance, such as illegal, discipline, job, award, and the record of social welfare activities, can become the foundation of the assessment. At the same time, social establishment of the personal credit system is also required to provide information on social examination staff; the second is to re-evaluate, more important to cultivate in moral issues. There is a principle of management: "Quality is produced instead of checking out." "Qualification examination for graduate students is important, but more fundamental is also effective moral education for adolescents. The formation and development of human moral concepts is not born, but a process. Only pay attention to individual inspections, and ignore this process, it is finally lost.
Education development is more demanded
Yan Zhijun, Renmin University of China
The Ministry of Education is in accordance with the provisions of the "unqualified personnel of ideology and morality, not admitted", and has been discounted by some people. They believe that the moral assessment is a factor outside the score to determine admissions admission, which is unfair. However, if we let go of your eyes, it will find that virtue is also actually a common requirement for many national education departments for students. In the United States, although the mainstream moral concept of society is very different from us, in addition to examining students' "academic capacity", they must review their character and participate in community services.
In contrast, in addition to the study of students, our colleges and universities have almost no other constraints in addition to learning achievements. Although the ideological and moral assessment has always stipulated, but only stay in the level of the chart. In recent years, with the continuous expansion of the enrollment scale, the limitations of the existing education constraint mechanism have become more and more high, and the graduate students have plagiarized and scientific research and fake, and the level of graduate students has been unfortunate.
Therefore, postgraduate students have to pass "morality", should be the meaning of ideological and political construction in colleges and universities. The key to the problem is how this "morality" should be set. In the case where the national credit system has not yet been sound, how to scientifically evaluate the moral cultivation of candidates, and should become a procedure for the education authorities to properly solve.
Moral assessment should ensure fairness, justice
Molin Hao, Changsha City, Hunan Province
Postgraduate admission implementation of moral assessment, and even "one vote veto", this sounds a good idea. However, this unmatched moral assessment can guarantee fair and fair, it is a question worthy of paying close attention. First of all, the enrollment unit is mainly to discuss the candidates' ideological and morality of candidates. It is well known that this way is difficult to find students who truly moral quality problems. A person's ideological and morality can only be discriminated by long-term contact and interaction. It is difficult to judge the moral quality of candidates through a few documents.
Further, who is it to act as an ethical examiner? In recent years, people have more and more discovering that colleges and universities are not the pure land, and they don't have a teacher. In this case, does the morality assessment lack of objective standards will bring power to the recruiters?
In addition, if a candidate has made a mistake in the past, he left a serious violation record in the archive, and he cannot be admitted by the admissions unit in accordance with the regulations. Is this reasonable? Is it wrong with a person, there is no qualifications and rights across graduate education? In fact, even prisoners cannot be deprived of re-education. This approach seems to help improve the morality of the society, actually to reverse.
